Educational Institutions Should Not Be Shut Down For Debt Recovery When Other Options Exist: DRAT Kolkata

The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) at Kolkata has recently observed that educational institutions should not be shut down or their management taken over by secured creditors when other lawful modes of recovery are available, while partly allowing an appeal filed by Kotak Mahindra Bank against an interim order passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Kolkata.Chairperson Justice Anil Kumar Srivastava observed, “Educational Institutions are not to be shut down or their Management should...

Agricultural Officer Certificate Not Enough To Claim SARFAESI Exemption For Agricultural Land: DRT Ernakulam

The Debts Recovery Tribunal at Ernakulam has recently held that a certificate issued by an Agricultural Officer is not sufficient by itself to prove that a secured property is agricultural land exempt from recovery under the SARFAESI Act, reiterating that the burden lies on the borrower to establish the nature of the land at the time the loan was availed.Presiding Officer Sovan Kumar Dash dismissed a securitization application filed by borrowers challenging recovery proceedings initiated by...

Bank Cannot Attach Deposits Pending Recovery Proceedings Without Show Cause Notice Under RDB Act: DRAT Chennai

The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), Chennai has held that a bank cannot attach or exercise lien over deposits during the pendency of recovery proceedings unless the procedure prescribed under the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act is followed. It also ruled that such relief cannot be granted when the original application does not contain a specific prayer seeking recovery against the concerned party. Interim directions, the tribunal said, cannot travel beyond the scope of the main...

SARFAESI Notice To Dead Guarantor Was Invalid Even If Received By Borrower's Wife: DRT Ernakulam

The Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) in Kerala has set aside recovery proceedings initiated by South Indian Bank Ltd. under the SARFAESI Act after finding that one of the demand notices had been issued to a guarantor who had died several years earlier. Presiding Officer Sovan Kumar Dash, while partly allowing a securitization application filed by borrower Shijo Jose, observed that a demand notice issued to a deceased person is void from the outset and cannot be validated merely because it was...

Establishment Of Kolhapur Bench No Ground To Say Mumbai Seat Lost Jurisdiction Over Writ Against DRAT Order: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has recently ruled that the creation of the Kolhapur Circuit Bench does not divest the Principal Seat at Mumbai of jurisdiction over a writ petition challenging an order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, even where the dispute originates in Kolhapur district. A Division Bench of Justices Manish Pitale and Shreeram V. Shirsat made the observation while hearing a writ petition challenging a September 19, 2024 order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) in...

ACJM Not Subordinate To CJM In Judicial Functions In SARFAESI Possession Proceedings: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has held that an Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate is competent to entertain applications under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, ruling that the magistrate exercises judicial powers at par with a Chief Judicial Magistrate. Section 14 allows a secured creditor (bank/financial institution) to seek assistance from a magistrate to take physical possession of secured assets when a borrower defaults.A coram of Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke dismissed a criminal application filed...

SARFAESI Action Does Not Bar Civil Court From Hearing Partition Suit: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has held that civil courts retain jurisdiction to adjudicate partition suits involving secured assets, observing that the Debts Recovery Tribunal cannot grant such relief even where proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI) have been initiated. A Single Bench of Justice N.J. Jamadar observed that, “The Tribunal, thus, cannot transgress its jurisdictional limits and delve into the...

Auction Of Pledged Gold Not Governed By SARFAESI: J&K and Ladakh High Court

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh on Wednesday dismissed writ petitions challenging Axis Bank's proposed auction of pledged gold ornaments, observing that such action does not fall within the ambit of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) since pledges of movable property are excluded under Section 31(b) of the statute. A division bench of Justice Sindhu Sharma and Justice Shahzad Azeem was dealing...

Single Judge Cannot Disregard Rulings Of Division Bench Under Guise Of Reference: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on Wednesday held that a Single Judge is bound by decisions of Division Benches and Full Benches and cannot question or disregard a binding Division Bench ruling under the guise of making a reference. A Division Bench of Chief Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Syam Kumar V.M was dealing with a reference arising from a writ petition filed by Grids Engineers and Contractors, challenging proceedings initiated by Union Bank of India under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The Bench...

Bank Cannot Cancel Confirmed Auction Sale Due To Pending DRT Proceedings: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on 3 March held that a bank cannot unilaterally set aside a confirmed auction sale merely because proceedings challenging the sale are pending before the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT). A Division Bench of Justice Anil K Narendran and Justice Muralee Krishna S was considering an appeal filed by the legal heirs of Vinod M.A., an auction purchaser. The Court stated: “It is trite that the authorised officer of the Bank cannot set aside the sale which was already confirmed in...

Limited SARFAESI Auction Deferment To Preserve Subject Matter Within Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on Monday upheld a Single Judge's two-week deferment of a SARFAESI auction, holding that the limited relief granted to preserve the subject matter did not exceed supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution. A division bench of Justice Anil K Narendran and Justice Muralee Krishna S dismissed a writ appeal filed by Union Bank of India, observing that the single judge had not entered into the merits of the dispute. S.S. Glass World had approached the...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Bank-Issued LOCs Against Pomegranate Coaters Directors and Guarantors

The Delhi High Court on 18 February set aside Look Out Circulars (LOCs) issued by Bank of Baroda against the directors and guarantors of Pomegranate Coaters Pvt. Ltd. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav was hearing petitions by the directors, promoters, and guarantors of Pomegranate Coaters, who had availed credit facilities from the bank.Following defaults, the bank initiated recovery proceedings under the SARFAESI Act and the Recovery of Debts Due to Financial Institutions Act, and...