Madras High Court Quashes CBI Case After Bank Accepted IBC Resolution Plan, Issued No Due Certificate

The Madras High Court has held that Union Bank of India ought not to have initiated criminal proceedings against Star Agro Marine Exports Private Limited and its directors after accepting the corporate insolvency resolution plan, accepting the settlement amount and issuing a No Due Certificate The court held that the prosecution initiated thereafter amounted to an abuse of the process of law. Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan passed the order while quashing criminal proceedings initiated by the...

Auction Purchaser Can Seek Refund If Material Title Defects Were Not Disclosed: Andhra Pradesh High Court

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has directed Indian Bank to refund the entire auction consideration paid by an auction purchaser, along with stamp duty, registration charges, and 9% simple interest, after holding that he could not be compelled to continue with a purchase clouded by title disputes. The court also set aside the sale certificate and the registered sale deed issued in his favour. A Division Bench of Justice Battu Devanand and Justice A. Hari Haranadha Sarma observed that an auction...

MSME Borrower Must Establish Status Before NPA To Avail RBI's Revival Framework: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has reiterated that an MSME borrower seeking the benefit of the RBI's statutory framework for revival and rehabilitation must disclose its MSME status to the lending bank. It must also produce authenticated documents establishing its eligibility at the time of availing credit facilities or, at the latest, before the loan account is classified as a non-performing asset (NPA). A division bench of Chief Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Syam Kumar V.M., applying the Supreme...

Rajasthan High Court To Decide If Police Can Levy Fees On Banks For SARFAESI Possession Assistance

The Rajasthan High Court is set to examine whether the Police Department can levy charges on banks for providing police assistance to recover secured assets under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act, 2002. A Single Bench of Justice Sameer Jain on 6 July was hearing a petition filed by AU Small Finance Bank Ltd challenging the Rajasthan Police Department's levy of charges for providing police assistance in...

Limitation U/S 138 NI Act Runs From Receipt Of Returned Notice Not Its Refusal: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on 8 July held that in prosecutions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (dishonour of cheque for insufficiency of funds), the limitation period for filing a complaint begins from the date the complainant receives the returned postal cover or is informed that the statutory notice could not be served, and not from the date the addressee refused or left the notice unclaimed. Justice A Badharudeen allowed an appeal filed by Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co....

Civil Courts Can't Grant Interim Relief Against SARFAESI Proceedings Despite Suit Being Maintainable: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has held that civil courts cannot grant interim injunctions to halt proceedings under the SARFAESI Act even where the underlying civil suit is maintainable. The ruling applies where the relief sought falls outside the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal. Justice S. Manu delivered the ruling while dismissing an appeal filed by Deepa George against an order of the III Additional Sub Court, Ernakulam refusing interim relief against Federal Bank. The court observed that...

Sec.138 NI Act Not Maintainable On Cheque Issued After Company's Dissolution: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court on 1 July held that proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 are not maintainable where a cheque is issued in the name of a company that had already been struck off and dissolved. A Bench of Justice M Nagaprasanna allowed the petition and quashed the complaint proceedings initiated against Giga Networks Private Limited and its former director. He observed: “On a blend of the judgments rendered by the Apex Court and that of the High Court of...

SARFAESI Security Interest Cannot Override Statutory First Charge Under AP Tax Laws: Karnataka High Court

The court also urged the legislature to clearly specify whether legislative amendments are prospective, retrospective, or retroactive to reduce interpretational disputes while dealing with amendments to the SARFAESI Act.

EPF Dues Get Priority Over Establishment Assets, Not Partner's Personal Property: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has recently held that while the statutory first charge under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 takes priority over competing claims against the assets of an establishment, it does not automatically extend to the separate property of a partner of a partnership firm. Justice Anant Ramanath Hegde said Section 11(2) of the EPF Act expressly creates a first charge only over the assets of the establishment and not over the separate assets...

Settlement Preserving S.138 Proceedings Keeps Cheque Dishonour Liability Alive: Delhi High Court

On 1 July, the Delhi High Court held that assignment of debt to a sister concern under a settlement agreement does not extinguish liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act where the settlement expressly preserves cheque dishonour proceedings, and interpretation of such settlement terms involves disputed questions of fact unsuitable for adjudication in proceedings under Section 482 CrPC. Justice Amit Mahajan dismissed petitions filed by Flywheel Logistics Pvt. Ltd. and its directors, Anil...

SARFAESI Auction Purchasers Cannot Be Thrown On Streets On Account Of Dispute Between Banks: Bombay High Court

Successful auction purchasers holding a registered sale certificate under the SARFAESI Act cannot be thrown on the streets because of an inter se dispute between two secured creditors, the Bombay High Court held on Tuesday. "The petitioners, who are successful auction purchasers having registered sale certificate in respect of the said flat in their favour and who have been in valid and legal possession of the aforesaid flat for more than eight years, cannot be thrown on the streets, on the...

Wife Claiming Residence Rights In Mortgaged Property Need Not Make SARFAESI Pre-Deposit For Appeal: DRAT Delhi

A wife claiming a right to reside in a mortgaged property as her shared household is not required to make the statutory pre-deposit to pursue an appeal under the SARFAESI Act, the Delhi Bench of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) has held. The tribunal, however, ruled that her claim under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, could not defeat HDFC Bank's right to enforce its security interest over the property. A tribunal headed by Chairperson Justice Sudhir...