Bombay High Court Declares 5 Paintings, Including 2 By M.F. Husain, Mafatlal's Liquidation Assets

The Bombay High Court on 21 October declared five of 44 paintings, including works by M.F. Husain, as assets of Mafatlal Dyes & Chemicals Limited, which is undergoing liquidation, allowing their sale to realise proceeds for the company's creditors and other stakeholders. Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan considered rival ownership claims over the paintings and the Official Liquidator's application seeking permission to sell the five paintings identified as company assets. The Bench held: “...I...

Karnataka High Court Refuses To Quash Case Against Super Royal Holidays Directors For Ignoring Summons

The Karnataka High Court on 17 October dismissed a petition filed by Madhukar and Prashanth Bhadrappan, directors of Super Royal Holidays (India) Private Limited, challenging criminal proceedings for alleged non-compliance with an investigation under the Companies Act, 2013. Justice H.P. Sandesh held that the Special Court for Economic Offences, Bengaluru, had applied its mind to the complaint and accompanying documents before taking cognizance of the alleged offence under Section 217(4) of the...

Delhi High Court Quashes SFIO Probe Into Educomp Solutions

The Delhi High Court has recently quashed the Central Government's order directing a Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) probe into Educomp Solutions Limited, an education technology company, holding that the order did not explain why the company's affairs warranted such an investigation under the Companies Act, 2013. Justice Amit Mahajan allowed petitions filed by former Educomp independent director Vinod Kumar Dandona, directors and shareholders Jagdish Prakash and Shantanu Prakash,...

Can NCLT Declare A Registered Sale Deed Void? Kerala High Court Explains

The Kerala High Court has recently held that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) cannot declare a registered sale deed void and not binding on a company merely because a dispute involves allegations of oppression and mismanagement. “When the reliefs sought in the suits are considered alongside the scope of application under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act 2013, it would be difficult to conclude that the National Company Law Tribunal has jurisdiction to declare a registered...

Kerala HC Sets Aside NCLT Order Refusing To Implead Alleged Share Transferees In Company Mismanagement Case

The Kerala High Court has set aside an order of the National Company Law Tribunal, Kochi Bench, refusing to implead two alleged share transferees in a company petition alleging mismanagement, holding that their presence was necessary for effective adjudication of the dispute over the original petitioners' shareholding.Justice Harisankar V Menon held that the alleged transferees were proper parties even though no specific relief had been sought against them, as their presence was necessary to...

Section 21 Of Companies Act Does Not Bar Oral Agreements Between Companies: Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court on 15 September held that Section 21 of the Companies Act, 2013, does not bar oral agreements between companies, clarifying that the provision governing authorised signatories does not require every agreement to be in writing. Justice Rekha Borana dismissed a civil revision petition filed by Gnex Impex Private Limited and its director against an order dated 22 May 2025, by which the District Judge, Jodhpur Metropolitan, rejected their application to dismiss a suit filed...

Karnataka High Court Closes Morgan Securities' Contempt Plea Against BPL Over Alleged Property Encumbrance

The Karnataka High Court has closed a contempt petition filed by Morgan Securities and Credits Private Limited against BPL Limited and its directors over the alleged violation of a 2020 order restraining the company from alienating or encumbering its properties.A Division Bench of Justice Jayant Banerji and Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju found that Morgan Securities had failed to produce documentary evidence of a breach. The court observed that the petitioner had not established that any of BPL's...

Arbitration Clause In Articles Of Association Operates Independently Of Companies Act: Calcutta High Court

On Monday, 28 September, the Calcutta High Court held that an arbitration clause contained in a company's Articles of Association operates as an independent agreement and does not make disputes covered by the clause subject exclusively to the jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). A Division Bench comprising Justices Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya and Sandip Kumar De made the observation while allowing an appeal filed by Ambica Beri against the District Judge's refusal to grant...

Calcutta High Court Stays SFIO Probe Into Alleged Misuse Of HNGIL Exempted Employees' Provident Fund Trust

The Calcutta High Court on Wednesday stayed a Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) investigation into alleged financial irregularities involving funds of an exempted provident fund Trust operated by Hindusthan National Glass and Industries Limited (HNGIL) for its employees.A Division Bench of Justices Debangsu Basak and Aryak Dutt modified the August 3, 2026, order of the Single Judge. The order had extended an ex parte ad interim injunction and continued the direction for an SFIO...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Quash Criminal Case Against Supertech Directors Over Hill Town Project

The Delhi High Court has refused to quash criminal proceedings against directors of real estate company Supertech Limited over allegations of cheating, criminal breach of trust and criminal conspiracy linked to its Hill Town project in Sohna, Haryana.Justice Madhu Jain was dealing with three connected petitions arising from an FIR registered by the Economic Offences Wing over alleged non-delivery of flats, discontinuation of pre-EMI payments and alleged diversion and utilisation of funds...

Official Liquidator Gets 3 Years From Winding Up Order To File Claim: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on 31 August held that a claim instituted by an Official Liquidator under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956, in respect of a legally enforceable claim is governed by the three year limitation period under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, reckoned from the date of the winding up order, with the benefit of the additional one year period under Section 458A of the Companies Act. Justice Harisankar V Menon rejected the respondent, Miny Zachariah's objection that...

Delhi High Court Dismisses PIL Against IFCI's ₹440.93 Cr NSE Share Sale For Petitioner's Forum Shopping

On 19 August, the Delhi High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging IFCI Ltd's sale of shares in the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd (NSE), holding that the petitioner had suppressed an earlier proceeding before the Bombay High Court on the same issue. A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia held that the petitioner's suppression of the earlier proceeding disentitled him to relief and imposed exemplary costs of Rs....