CUSTOMS
Madras High Court Holds Unreasonable Delay Bars Duty Drawback Recovery, Quashes ₹38.77 Lakh Demand
The Madras High Court on 7 July held that customs authorities cannot recover duty drawback benefits after an unreasonable and unexplained delay, even when the relevant rules do not prescribe a specific limitation period for such recovery. Justice Hemant Chandangoudar quashed the recovery proceedings initiated against A.Kiyasdeen, an exporter for recovery of Rs. 38.77 lakh in duty drawback and a penalty of Rs. 1 lakh, holding that the proceedings initiated several years after the drawback was...
CESTAT Hyderabad Sets Aside ₹26.60 Lakh Customs Duty Demand, Rules Imported Quicklime Is Not Chemical Product
The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has allowed the appeal filed by V I S A Steel Ltd., holding that imported quicklime is classifiable as lime under the Customs Tariff and not under the tariff entry applicable to chemically defined compounds. The tribunal set aside a differential customs duty demand of ₹26.60 lakh, along with the interest and penalty. A bench of Judicial Member Angad Prasad and Technical Member P. Anjani Kumar observed: ...
CESTAT Ahmedabad Says Director's Position Alone Cannot Attract Customs Penalty Quashes ₹1 Cr Levy
On 9 July, the Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that a company director cannot be penalised under the Customs Act, 1962 merely because of his position in the company unless the Department proves his active involvement in the alleged offence. Judicial Member Dr. Ajaya Krishna Vishvesha and Technical Member Satendra Vikram Singh allowed the appeal filed by Global Enterprises' director Altaf Ahmed and set aside the Rs. 1 crore penalty imposed...
CESTAT Mumbai Sets Aside Customs Broker Licence Revocation For Lack Of Independent Findings
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set aside the revocation of a Customs Broker's licence. It found that the customs department failed to establish that the broker had breached its obligations while handling exports that were later alleged to have been overvalued to claim higher duty drawback. A tribunal comprising Judicial Member S.K. Mohanty and Technical Member M.M. Parthiban held that the licensing authority had failed to independently...
Authorised Courier Can Appeal Licence Revocation After Chief Commissioner Representation: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court has held that an Authorised Courier whose licence has been revoked under the Courier Imports and Exports (Clearance) Regulations, 2010 can maintain a statutory appeal under Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962, even after availing the remedy of representation before the Chief Commissioner under the Regulations.A Division Bench of Justices Anil Kshetrapal and Shail Jain set aside a CESTAT order that had dismissed the courier's appeal as not maintainable on the ground that...
CESTAT Chennai Sets Aside Customs Duty Demand After Royalty Was Added To Import Value
The Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set aside a customs duty demand that arose after royalty payments were added to the transaction value of imported raw materials. The tribunal followed its earlier ruling in the same company's case after finding that the Revenue had not shown any change in facts, produced any new document, or established any change in law to justify taking a different view. The bench of Judicial Member P. Dinesha and...
CESTAT Allahabad Sets Aside Gold Seizure, Finds Customs Relied On Unreliable Panchnama And Retracted Statements
The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside a customs order confiscating gold jewellery and bullion. It held that the panchnama forming the foundation of the case was unreliable because the Department failed to substantiate it by examining the panch witnesses. A bench of Judicial Member P.K. Choudhary and Technical Member P. Anjani Kumar held that the Revenue's case also rested on statements that had been retracted at the first available...
CESTAT Chennai Rejects Reclassification Of Nikrothal Wire To Stainless Steel Wire CTH
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 2 July held that the Customs Department cannot reclassify imported Nikrothal wire from Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 75052200 (Nickel Alloy Wire) to CTH 72230091 (Stainless Steel Wire) when the issue has already been decided in the importer's own case and there is no change in facts or law. Judicial Member P. Dinesha and Technical Member M. Ajit Kumar allowed an appeal filed by Alleima India Private Limited...
Duty-Free Gold Cannot Be Confiscated If DGFT Later Regularises Supporting Manufacturers: CESTAT Kolkata
The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that duty-free gold imported under the Advance Authorisation Scheme cannot be confiscated merely because it was sent to job workers who were not initially listed as supporting manufacturers. The tribunal held that the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) had later regularized their inclusion and that there was no evidence the gold had been diverted to unauthorised entities in violation of the...
E-Rickshaw Parts Without Motors, Batteries Not Complete Vehicles In CKD Form: CESTAT Kolkata
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 2 July held that imported e-rickshaw parts without essential components such as motors and batteries cannot be treated as complete e-rickshaws in a completely knocked down (CKD) condition. A Bench comprising Judicial Member Ashok Jindal and Technical Member K. Anpazhakan allowed cross-appeals filed by Zeniak Innovation India Ltd and the Revenue in a dispute over customs classification of imported...
CESTAT Kolkata Sets Aside Confiscation Of 1.75 Kg Gold, Holds Suspicion Insufficient To Prove Smuggling
On 2 July, the Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that Customs cannot treat gold as smuggled merely on suspicion and set aside the confiscation of 1.75 kg of gold along with penalties imposed by the department. Judicial Member Ashok Jindal and Technical Member K. Anpazhakan allowed the appeal filed by Dinesh Prasad and Raj Kumar Soni and quashed the confiscation order passed by Customs. The Bench observed: “...the Revenue has merely relied...