CESTAT Delhi Allows ₹6.51 Crore CENVAT Credit To Bharat Aluminium On Coal Supplier's Invoices

The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has recently allowed Bharat Aluminium Company Limited (BALCO) to claim CENVAT credit of ₹6.51 crore on supplementary invoices issued by South Eastern Coalfields Limited (SECL). The tribunal held that the invoices were eligible for credit because SECL's earlier short-payment of excise duty was not due to fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts.The Bench comprised Officiating President Dr. Rachna Gupta...

Cost Of Tools, Dies Used To Make Auto Parts Must Be Amortized For Excise Duty: CESTAT Delhi

The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled that the entire cost of tools and dies cannot be added to the assessable value of automobile parts. Only their amortized value can be included.“There cannot be any dispute that the final products cannot be manufactured without the tools and dies and, therefore, their value should included. However, they are not used only once but over and over again. Therefore, the cost of the tool or die has to be...

Sale Price Below Manufacturing Cost Cannot Be Accepted for Excise Valuation Even For Independent Buyers: CESTAT Allahabad

The Allahabad CESTAT has ruled that a manufacturer cannot automatically rely on a declared sale price for excise valuation merely because the buyer is an independent party when the price is substantially and continuously below the cost of manufacture.The tribunal made the finding in appeals filed by Eveready Industries India Ltd. over the valuation of batteries supplied to two torch manufacturers. It held that it was unnecessary to conclusively decide whether the buyers were “related persons”...

Sugar Syrup With 80% Sugar Used To Make Exempt Biscuits Is Excisable: CESTAT Ahmedabad

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad on 31 August held that sugar syrup containing 80% sugar by weight is marketable and liable to excise duty. A Bench comprising Judicial Member Somesh Arora and Technical Member Satendra Vikram Singh partly allowed the appeal filed by ETC Agro Processing (India) Pvt. Ltd. against a demand of around Rs.49.68 lakh, while remanding the matter for verification and grant of eligible CENVAT credit on sugar used to manufacture...

CESTAT Hyderabad Says Sample Purchase Orders Cannot Establish All Sales Were FOR Sales

On 25 August, the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad held that the Revenue cannot presume that all sales were on FOR (Free on Road) basis merely from sample purchase orders relied upon in the show cause notice. Technical Member A.K. Jyotishi and Judicial Member Angad Prasad dismissed the Department's appeal against Eco-Care Building Products Pvt. Ltd. and upheld the dropping of the substantial portion of the differential Central Excise duty demand for the...

CESTAT Ahmedabad Holds ₹54 Lakh Recovery Against Panasonic Time-Barred, Faults Department's Inaction

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad on 24 August set aside recovery of Rs. 54,00,034 from Panasonic Life Solutions India, holding that the Department's show cause notice issued nearly six years after the credit was taken was barred by limitation. A Bench comprising Judicial Member Dr. Ajaya Krishna Vishvesha and Technical Member Satendra Vikram Singh held that recovery of irregular or excess credit under Notification No. 39/2001-CE is subject to the...

Deletion Of 'Setting Up' Does Not Bar CENVAT Credit On Plant-Setting Services: CESTAT Ahmedabad

On 19 August, the Ahmedabad Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that CENVAT credit cannot be denied merely because the expression “setting up” was omitted from the definition of “input service” under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, with effect from 1 April 2011. A Bench comprising Judicial Member Dr. Ajaya Krishna Vishvesha and Technical Member Satendra Vikram Singh partially allowed appeals filed by ATC Tires Pvt. Ltd. against denial of CENVAT...

Non-Manufacturer Must Deposit Excess Excise Duty Collected From Buyer: CESTAT Delhi

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Delhi, has held that a non-manufacturer who collects an amount representing excise duty in excess of the actual duty paid on goods must deposit the excess amount with the Central Government.A coram comprising Judicial Member Binu Tamta and Technical Member P.V. Subba Rao made the ruling while dismissing Vihaan Enterprises' appeal against a ₹4.00 crore demand under the Central Excise Act, 1944, along with interest.The demand was...

CESTAT Kolkata Allows CENVAT Credit On Steel Used To Manufacture Capital Goods

The Kolkata bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has allowed Maithan Steel & Power Ltd. to claim CENVAT credit on MS angles, channels, joists and plates used to manufacture capital goods for use within its factory.The tribunal also allowed credit on welding rods and oxygen. Judicial Member R. Muralidhar observed, “From the above Certificate, it is seen that the goods in question including the welding rods and oxygen have been used within the factory...

CESTAT Chandigarh Remands Dabur Appeals Over Excess Self-Credit, Excise Duty Demands For Recalculation

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh, has sent back a batch of appeals involving demands against Dabur India Ltd.'s Jammu and Kashmir units for allegedly taking refunds or self-credit in excess of the value addition permitted under the applicable exemption.For Unit I, the Department had demanded ₹3.45 crore as repayment of self-credit and a further ₹12.41 lakh as excise duty. For Unit II, it had demanded ₹5.40 crore as repayment of self-credit and a further...

CESTAT Chandigarh Allows CENVAT Credit On Inputs From Exempt Units, Grants Relief To Reckitt Benckiser

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh, has ruled that consumer goods maker Reckitt Benckiser India Ltd. was entitled to claim CENVAT credit on duty-paid raw materials purchased from certain tax-exempt manufacturers.It held that the benefit could not be denied simply because the law was amended later to expressly allow it. "We find that before the amendment there was no express prohibition in the CENVAT Credit Rules so as to deny such credit availed by the...

CESTAT Chennai Sets Aside Reclassification Of Poultry Cage Components As Iron and Steel Structures

The Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set aside the reclassification of weld mesh components used in poultry battery cages. It held that the Revenue failed to explain how products admittedly manufactured exclusively for use in poultry battery cages could be treated as iron and steel structures under the Central Excise Tariff."The Revenue has not made any attempt in placing on record conceivable and convincing reasons as to how the goods under...