CENVAT Credit Rules Do Not Make Ownership Of Goods A Condition For Availing Credit: CESTAT Chandigarh

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the CENVAT Credit Rules do not make ownership of goods a condition for claiming CENVAT credit. It observed that CENVAT credit is attached to inputs and not to persons. The tribunal, however, ruled that a manufacturer cannot claim credit on inputs where the contractor has availed the benefit of abatement under the Works Contract (Composition Scheme), as that would result in the same tax benefit...

CESTAT Delhi Upholds CENVAT Credit Reversal On Common Services Used For Own Investments

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has upheld the demand for proportionate reversal of CENVAT credit on common input services used for both taxable services and an assessee's own investment activities. The tribunal held that buying and selling securities on one's own account is neither a taxable service nor an exempted service. It ruled that CENVAT credit attributable to such activities is inadmissible. A bench of Judicial Member...

Customs Duty Exemption Available For ELISA Kits Cannot Be Claimed By Individual Components: CESTAT Delhi

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has recently held that QFT Tubes, though functionally used with ELISA kits, are not entitled to the concessional 5% Basic Customs Duty (BCD) available to ELISA kits. ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay) is a diagnostic testing method used to detect diseases by analysing blood samples.It held that the exemption applies only to the complete diagnostic kit and not to its individual...

Customs Appeals Cannot Face Maintainability Challenge At Pre-Admission Stage: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court on 10 July held that parties in customs appeals cannot challenge the maintainability of such appeals at the pre-admission stage, and must raise objections relating to jurisdiction or maintainability only after the Court determines whether the appeal involves a substantial question of law. A Division Bench of Justices Rajarshi Bharadwaj and Uday Kumar rejected the respondents' request for a preliminary hearing on maintainability while hearing a batch of appeals filed by...

Meeting Fees To Whole-Time Directors Not Taxable Under Reverse Charge Mechanism: CESTAT New Delhi

The New Delhi Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 13 July held that meeting fees paid to whole-time directors are not liable to service tax under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM), as such payments arise from an employer-employee relationship and are excluded from the definition of “service” under the Finance Act, 1994. Judicial Member Binu Tamta and Technical Member P.V. Subba Rao allowed the appeal filed by Oriental Chemical Works and set aside the service tax...

CESTAT New Delhi Restores India-Thailand FTA Benefit To P.C. Jeweller Citing Verification Rules

On Tuesday, 14 July, the Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at New Delhi, held that the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) cannot deny preferential customs duty benefits under the India-Thailand Free Trade Agreement without following the prescribed procedure to verify Country of Origin (COO) Certificates with the issuing authority. A Bench of Judicial Member Ashok Jindal and Technical Member K. Anpazhakan allowed a batch of appeals filed by...

Non-Filing Of Service Tax Returns Alone Doesn't Prove Tax Evasion; CESTAT Chennai Quashes ₹37.54 Lakh Demand

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set aside a service tax demand of ₹37.54 lakh against SPI Technologies India Pvt. Ltd., holding that the Department could not invoke the extended limitation period merely because the alleged tax liability surfaced during a departmental audit. The tribunal held that the revenue had failed to establish the wilful suppression or intent to evade tax required to invoke the extended period. A bench of Judicial...

Madras High Court Holds Unreasonable Delay Bars Duty Drawback Recovery, Quashes ₹38.77 Lakh Demand

The Madras High Court on 7 July held that customs authorities cannot recover duty drawback benefits after an unreasonable and unexplained delay, even when the relevant rules do not prescribe a specific limitation period for such recovery. Justice Hemant Chandangoudar quashed the recovery proceedings initiated against A.Kiyasdeen, an exporter for recovery of Rs. 38.77 lakh in duty drawback and a penalty of Rs. 1 lakh, holding that the proceedings initiated several years after the drawback was...

CESTAT Hyderabad Sets Aside ₹26.60 Lakh Customs Duty Demand, Rules Imported Quicklime Is Not Chemical Product

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has allowed the appeal filed by V I S A Steel Ltd., holding that imported quicklime is classifiable as lime under the Customs Tariff and not under the tariff entry applicable to chemically defined compounds. The tribunal set aside a differential customs duty demand of ₹26.60 lakh, along with the interest and penalty. A bench of Judicial Member Angad Prasad and Technical Member P. Anjani Kumar observed: ...

CESTAT Hyderabad Allows CENVAT Credit On Concessional CVD, Says Importer Free To Choose Beneficial Exemption

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that an importer cannot be compelled to avail a particular exemption notification where more than one option is available. It ruled that the importer is free to choose the notification that is most beneficial. Applying this principle, the tribunal held that India Cements Ltd. was entitled to avail the CENVAT credit of the Countervailing Duty (CVD) paid at the concessional rate of one per cent/two...

CESTAT Ahmedabad Says Director's Position Alone Cannot Attract Customs Penalty Quashes ₹1 Cr Levy

On 9 July, the Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that a company director cannot be penalised under the Customs Act, 1962 merely because of his position in the company unless the Department proves his active involvement in the alleged offence. Judicial Member Dr. Ajaya Krishna Vishvesha and Technical Member Satendra Vikram Singh allowed the appeal filed by Global Enterprises' director Altaf Ahmed and set aside the Rs. 1 crore penalty imposed...

CESTAT Mumbai Awards ₹50,000 Costs After Holding Department Harassed Taxpayer Over ₹33,373 Pre-Deposit Refund

The Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has imposed ₹50,000 as compensatory litigation costs on the Department after observing that proceedings over the refund of a mandatory pre-deposit of ₹33,373 appeared to have been unnecessarily initiated and were meant to harass a genuine taxpayer. The tribunal directed the Department to refund the pre-deposit along with statutory interest. A single-member tribunal of Judicial Member Dr. Suvendu Kumar Pati...