Fortis Not Liable To Pay ₹50 Lakh Service Tax On Facilities Provided To Visiting Doctors: CESTAT Chandigarh

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has recently held that Fortis Healthcare is not liable to pay service tax on infrastructure and administrative facilities provided to visiting doctors. A coram of Judicial Member S.S. Garg and Technical Member P. Anjani Kumar said the arrangement was part of delivering medical treatment and not a separate taxable service. Allowing the appeal, the tribunal held that such services “do not fall under the category of...

CESTAT Chennai Allows Nissan Group SEZ Unit's Claim For Refund Of Service Tax Paid

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at Chennai has ruled in favour of Renault Nissan Technology and Business Centre India, holding that service tax refund claims of Special Economic Zone units cannot be rejected only because they were filed late. A coram of Judicial Member P. Dinesha and Technical Member Vasa Seshagiri Rao said the six-month time limit in Notification No. 9/2009 Service Tax is procedural. It cannot defeat the statutory exemption under the SEZ law. ...

Mid-Day Meal Scheme: CESTAT Grants Service Tax Relief To Government Catering Institute

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has granted relief to a government-run catering institute that supplies Mid-Day meals to the UT education department. It reiterated that the preparation and supply of cooked food under the Mid-Day Meal Scheme does not amount to 'outdoor catering' and is therefore not liable to service tax.The coram, consisting of Judicial Member SS Garg and Technical Member P Anjani Kumar stated that the...

Chilly Seeds Imported For Sowing Cannot Be Classified As 'Spices': CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at New Delhi has held that chilly seeds imported exclusively for sowing cannot be treated as “spices” under the Customs Tariff and must instead be classified as seeds used for sowing under Chapter 12. A coram led by President Justice Dilip Gupta and Technical Member Hemambika R. Priya set aside a 2016 order of the Commissioner (Appeals) that had upheld a higher duty on such imports. For context, spices attract a 70% basic...

Differential GST On Pre-GST Works Contracts To Be Reimbursed By State Agencies: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court ruled that the additional GST liability arising out of the shift from the pre-GST VAT (Value Added Tax) regime to the GST regime in ongoing works contracts cannot be imposed on contractors.The bench consists of Justice M Nagaprasanna, who directed the State Departments and government agencies to reimburse the differential GST to contractors.All the contracts were awarded prior to July 2017 under the KVAT regime, where the contract rates factored in VAT and...

Gauhati High Court Rejects Bail Plea In ₹8.59 Crore GST Fraud Case

The Gauhati High Court has recently denied bail to a petitioner in Rs. 8.59-crore fake Input Tax Credit (ITC) scam, observing that the allegations disclose an organized and well-planned fraud involving misuse of the GST system. A bench comprising Justice Pranjal Das noted that custodial interrogation was necessary as the investigation was at a crucial stage and that granting bail could hamper efforts to unearth the larger conspiracy. Bahadur Islam, the petitioner, was arrested for alleged...

CESTAT Mumbai Allows CENVAT Credit On Kinder Joy Plastic Toys Despite Excise Exemption On Toys

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has allowed CENVAT credit on duty paid inputs and capital goods used to make plastic toys supplied with Kinder Joy chocolates. It held that such credit cannot be denied only because the toys were exempt from central excise duty. A coram of Judicial Member C.J. Mathew and Technical Member Ajay Sharma said that entitlement to CENVAT credit arises once duty-paid inputs or capital goods enter the factory. It can be...

Procuring Authority Liable For Differential GST In Government Contracts: Madras High Court Reiterates

Reiterating that additional GST arising from the rollout of the GST regime in government works contracts must be borne by the procuring authority, the Madras High Court has directed the Tamil Nadu Housing Board to consider a contractor's claim for reimbursement of differential tax.A Bench of Justice N Sathish Kumar relying on settled law, held that contractors cannot be fastened with liability for differential GST, interest, or penalties when tax was discharged strictly in accordance...

CESTAT Delhi Allows Importer To Claim Tax-Free Imports From Least Developed Countries Despite Licence Terms

The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that Customs authorities cannot deny duty-free benefits available to imports from Least Developed Countries merely because an import licence issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade refers to a separate concessional duty notification. A coram of President Justice Dilip Gupta and Technical Member P.V. Subba Rao set aside a customs duty demand, along with interest, penalty, and redemption fine,...

CESTAT Mumbai Reiterates 10% Customs Duty Benefit On Enterprise Ethernet Switches

Reiterating that customs authorities cannot deny a concessional duty without objective evidence, the Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has allowed Digisol Systems' appeal and extended the benefit of 10% customs duty on imported enterprise Ethernet switches and transceivers.A bench comprising Judicial Member S.K. Mohanty and Technical Member M.M. Prathiban was hearing an appeal filed by Digisol Systems, a provider of IT networking solutions and consultancy...

Kerala General Sales Tax Act | Once Limitation Lapses, Assessment Cannot Be Revived: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has held that assessment proceedings initiated beyond the statutory limitation period under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (KGST Act), are unsustainable in law and liable to be set aside. Justice Harisankar V. Menon noted that the pre-assessment notice under Section 17(3) of the KGST Act was issued against Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. for the assessment year 2007–08 only on August 25, 2017. The assessment order was passed later, on January 28, 2019. This was...

GST Notices And Orders Issued Only In Summary Forms Without Details Are Unsustainable: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court has quashed a GST adjudication order passed solely through summary online forms, holding that tax liability cannot be imposed without clearly setting out the allegations and reasons as required under law. A single-judge bench of Justice Om Narayan Rai said the manner in which the proceedings were conducted could not be sustained. “The order that has been passed and communicated to the petitioner has remained in summary form. It is bereft of any detail and sans any...