Rajasthan High Court

Rajasthan High Court Restores Canara Bank's Recovery Suit, Faults Court For Denying Chance To Remove Defects
The Rajasthan High Court has criticised the “undue haste” with which a Commercial Court handled a Canara Bank recovery suit, noting that the bank was not given adequate opportunity to remove procedural defects before the suit was dismissed.“One fails to understand the undue haste and alacrity with which the office of the Commercial Court as well the Court itself acted. Such swiftness, coupled with the fact that the learned Commercial Court also did not grant any opportunity to the appellant by...

Rajasthan High Court Quashes Jepee Construction's ₹6.93 Crore Tax Addition Over Short Response Time
On 6 October, the Rajasthan High Court held that less than three days to respond to a substantial tax addition is not a reasonable opportunity of hearing and set aside an assessment order passed by the National Faceless Assessment Centre against Jepee Construction Pvt. Ltd., involving an addition of about Rs. 6.93 crore. A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal and Justice Baljinder Singh Sandhu found that the assessment order wrongly recorded that the company had not filed...

Interim Arbitration Relief Plea Cannot Be Rejected At Threshold Merely Because It Covers Two Agreements: Rajasthan High Court
The Rajasthan High Court has held that an application seeking interim relief in aid of arbitration cannot be rejected at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11 merely on an objection that it covers two separate agreements containing separate arbitration clauses.Justice Anand Sharma observed, “The question whether two agreements are wholly independent or are interrelated is not necessarily capable of determination merely by looking at the title of the agreements or the fact that they contain...

Gulf Trade Disruptions: Rajasthan HC Issues Notice On MSME's Challenge To RELIEF Scheme Cut-Off Date
The Rajasthan High Court has recently issued notices to the government on a petition challenging the cut-off under Component III of the Resilience and Logistics Intervention for Export Facilitation (RELIEF) Scheme, which restricts reimbursement support to shipments having Onboard Bills of Lading issued between February 14, 2026 and March 15, 2026.A Division Bench of Justices Inderjeet Singh and Sandeep Taneja was hearing a petition filed by Agrim Overseas, an MSME exporter of perishable...

Denying Borrower Access To DRT To Challenge SARFAESI Possession Measures Violate Article 300A: Rajasthan HC
The Rajasthan High Court has held that denying a borrower an opportunity to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) while challenging steps taken by a bank to obtain physical possession of mortgaged property could amount to ignoring the borrower's constitutional right to property under Article 300A.“To deny the borrower an opportunity to access or approach the DRT while questioning the steps taken by the secured creditor to get physical possession of the mortgaged assets, would tantamount to...

Deductions Under Different Income Tax Provisions Must Be Computed Independently: Rajasthan High Court
The Rajasthan High Court on 5 September held that deductions available under different provisions of the Income Tax Act must be computed independently, and the restriction against double deduction can be applied only while allowing the deductions. A Division Bench of Justices Pushpendra Singh Bhati and Praveer Bhatnagar allowed Secure Meters Ltd.'s appeal and set aside the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's finding on the computation of deductions under Sections 80-IA/80-IB and Section 80HHC for...

25-Year Pendency Cannot Allow Writ Court To Decide Disputed Facts In Tax Case: Rajasthan High Court
The Rajasthan High Court on 21 August held that the mere pendency of a tax dispute for 25 years does not permit the Court to decide disputed questions of fact in writ proceedings on the basis of pleadings and affidavits, as this would bypass the fact-finding process under the Income Tax Act. A Division Bench of Justices Arun Monga and Ashutosh Kumar declined to interfere with reassessment notices issued to Mahesh Kumar Gupta for Assessment Years 1995-96 to 1999-2000, holding that the disputed...

Rajasthan High Court Rejects Challenge To GST Provision Requiring Supplier Tax Payment For ITC
The Rajasthan High Court has upheld the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, holding that actual payment of tax by the supplier is a valid condition for availing Input Tax Credit (ITC). A Division Bench of Justices Arun Monga and Ashutosh Kumar dismissed Sumetco Alloys Private Limited's challenge to Section 16(2)(c) as well as its challenge to a Rs. 56.44 crore GST demand for the financial years 2020-21 to 2023-24. The judges observed: ...

Rajasthan High Court Declines Writ Against Entry Tax Assessment, Says Appeal Is Equally Efficacious
The Rajasthan High Court on 6 August held that a statutory appeal under the Rajasthan Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 1999 is an equally efficacious remedy against an assessment order, including a challenge based on limitation. A Division Bench comprising Justices Arun Monga and Ashutosh Kumar disposed of a writ petition filed by Sika India Pvt. Ltd. challenging an assessment order dated 18 December 2018 and the consequential demand of Rs. 21.24 lakh towards entry tax, interest and...

Rajasthan High Court Rejects Claim To Adjust Earlier Service Tax Payment Against Dues Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme
The Rajasthan High Court has held that a taxpayer who declares the full service tax liability under the voluntary disclosure category of the Sabka Vishwas Scheme cannot later seek adjustment of an earlier tax payment against that declared amount, ruling that the statutory scheme treats the figure voluntarily declared as the tax due.A Division Bench comprising Justice Arun Monga and Justice Ashutosh Kumar held that in a voluntary disclosure case, the amount declared by the taxpayer itself is...

No Customs Interest On Capital Goods Kept In Bonded Warehouse Until Clearance: Rajasthan High Court
The Rajasthan High Court has upheld the setting aside of a ₹2.88-crore customs interest demand on solar modules imported by Acme Aklera Power Technology Pvt. Ltd. It held that interest under Section 61(2) of the Customs Act cannot be charged on capital goods covered by Section 61(1)(a). A Division Bench comprising Justice Arun Monga and Justice Ashutosh Kumar held that such capital goods can remain in a warehouse until clearance if they are intended for use in a warehouse where manufacture or...

Copyright Registration Not Mandatory To Initiate Criminal Proceedings For Infringement: Rajasthan High Court
The Rajasthan High Court has held that copyright registration is not mandatory for instituting criminal proceedings alleging copyright infringement. A party can claim rights over a title without registration, subject to establishing those rights through evidence.Justice Ashok Kumar Jain, in an order dated August 17, 2026, made the observation while refusing to quash a 2012 case concerning alleged infringement of copyright and trademark rights over Dandi Salt and Dandi Namak.The Court observed,...
