Excise Appeals To High Court On Substantial Questions Of Law Maintainable After NTT Act Struck Down: Patna High Court

The Patna High Court has recently held that appeals to High Courts in central excise matters involving substantial questions of law remain maintainable after the Supreme Court struck down the National Tax Tribunal Act, 2005, which had omitted the provision providing for such appeals. The court held that “The earlier provision mentioned in Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) as well as any other provisions of law which were omitted by...

Meghalaya High Court Strikes Down Excise Notification Cutting Liquor Retailers' Profit Margin From 20% to 15%

The Meghalaya High Court on Thursday struck down a state excise notification that reduced the maximum profit margin for liquor retailers from 20% to 15%, holding that the move unfairly burdened retailers while leaving other stakeholders unaffected, making it arbitrary and violative of Article 14.The court noted that while retailers' margins were reduced, other stakeholders such as Central Bonded Warehouses and Bonded Warehouses continued at existing margins. A coram comprising...

Rebate Cannot Be Denied On Procedural Lapses If Export Duty Payments Are Undisputed: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court on 20 February, held that a rebate of central excise duty on exported goods cannot be denied merely due to procedural lapses, such as non-submission of original ARE-1 documents, when the fact of export and payment of duty is otherwise established through supporting records. A Division Bench of Justice A. S. Supehia and Justice Pranav Trivedi allowed the writ petition filed by Ashland India Private Limited, setting aside orders that had rejected the company's rebate claim...

Madras High Court Upholds Notification Applying Excise Act Recovery Provision To Clean Environment Cess

The Madras High Court has upheld a Central Government notification applying provisions of the Central Excise Act, including those governing recovery of duties not levied or short-paid, to Clean Environment Cess. A Division Bench of Justice G. R. Swaminathan and Justice R. Kalaimathi held that the expression “levy” in the Finance Act, 2010 includes the processes of assessment and collection, allowing the government to extend recovery provisions of the Central Excise Act to the cess through...

Denial Of Cross-Examination Justified Under Excise Act When Statements Are Corroborated: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that the right of cross-examination under Section 9D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is not absolute, and may be lawfully denied in fact-specific circumstances, particularly where the witnesses are closely connected to the assessee and the allegations are supported by independent corroborative evidence.A Division Bench of Justices Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Ajay Digpaul thus dismissed the appeal filed by an assessee, holding that neither the adjudicating authority nor...

Allahabad High Court Grants Interim Relief To Tobacco Factory Owners Against CCTV Rule Enforcement

The Allahabad High Court on 4 February granted interim relief to owners of tobacco factories by protecting them against coercive measures for non-compliance with the mandate to install CCTV cameras in the premises of factories manufacturing tobacco, gutka, pan masala, and other commodities specified under the Chewing Tobacco, Jarda Scented Tobacco and Gutkha Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2026 (The Rules).The Bench of Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and...

Bombay High Court Upholds CESTAT Relief To KEC International In ₹4.42 Crore Excise Matter

The Bombay High Court on 4 February dismissed a Central Excise Appeal filed by the Revenue against KEC International Ltd., holding that no substantial question of law arose from the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) granting exemption benefits to the assessee. A Division Bench of Justice B. P. Colabawalla and Justice Firdosh P. Pooniwalla, while hearing the appeal, held that the Tribunal had examined the material on record and concluded that there was...

Calcutta High Court Grants Private Companies Same Excise Fee Exemption As Public Companies For Management Changes

Holding that the State cannot create artificial distinctions between similarly placed licensees in the matter of excise fee exemptions, the Calcutta High Court has ruled that private limited companies are entitled to the same treatment as public limited companies when changes in management occur in the ordinary course of business. The Court made it clear that even though liquor trade is a regulated privilege of the State, the manner in which that privilege — or exemptions attached to it — is...

Missing Export Form Not Fatal If Duty-Paid Export Proven: Gujarat High Court Restores Rs 1.29 Crore Excise Rebate

The Gujarat High Court has restored over Rs.1.29 Crore rebate claim of a merchant exporter, holding that the absence of original ARE-1 forms cannot defeat a rebate claim when export and duty payment are otherwise verifiable. ARE-1 stands for Application for Removal of Excisable Goods for Export. It was a statutory export document under the Central Excise Rules, 2002. It recorded details of manufacture, duty payment, and export. Under Rule 18, the original copy was ordinarily required to be...

CESTAT Cannot Reject Taxpayer Appeals Below ₹2 Lakh On Monetary Limit Alone: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court recently held that the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal cannot mechanically reject a taxpayer's appeal on the ground that the amount involved is below ₹2 lakh. The Court said such appeals are maintainable as a rule and may be refused only in exceptional cases.The ruling was delivered by a Division Bench of Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Justice Indrajeet Shukla. Explaining the law, the bench said, "Thus, while appeals filed by the revenue, below the...

CENVAT Refunds For Deemed Exports Barred After One Year from End of Claim Period: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench has recently held that a refund claim for unutilised CENVAT credit linked to deemed exports must be filed within the one-year time limit prescribed under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, which governs refund claims under excise law. The court said this limitation applies even when the refund is sought under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, which allows exporters to seek a refund of credit that cannot be utilised. A Division Bench of Justice Anil L....

New Limitation Plea Without Records Not Maintainable Before CESTAT: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court dismissed an appeal filed by M/s Modern Engineering & Plastics Pvt. Ltd., holding that a plea on limitation cannot be raised for the first time before the Tribunal without supporting factual material on record. A Bench of Justice Anita Sumanth and Justice P. Dhanabal observed that limitation under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is a mixed question of law and fact, and cannot be examined by a court or tribunal in the absence of necessary evidence. The...