Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Denial Of Interest Subsidy To MSME Despite Grant Of Power Subsidy Under WBIS 2013

The Calcutta High Court has set aside the West Bengal government's decision denying interest subsidy to Hooghly Extrusions Ltd., an MSME holding that once a unit is found eligible under the West Bengal Incentive Scheme, 2013 and granted one component of benefit, denial of another on technical grounds defeats the scheme's object.Allowing the writ petition, Justice Rai Chattopadhyay quashed the State's order dated February 22, 2019 and directed authorities to disburse the interest subsidy within...

Conciliation Under MSMED Act Is Mandatory, Cannot Be Waived By Parties: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on 27 February held that the statutory mandate of conciliation under Section 18(2) of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 cannot be waived by a party to proceedings before the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council. A Division Bench of Justice Anil K Narendran and Justice Muralee Krishna S allowed a writ appeal filed by Malabar Social Service and Sanitation (MASSS) and set aside the judgment of the Single Judge which had quashed an award...

MSME Revival Benefits Depend On Loan Limit, Not Outstanding Dues: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court recently held that eligibility for benefits under the Reserve Bank of India's framework for revival and rehabilitation of MSMEs depends on the sanctioned loan limit and not on the outstanding amount. The court, thus, cleared the way for Union Bank of India to continue insolvency proceedings against Vardhan Agro Processing Limited. A Division Bench of Justice Manish Pitale and Justice Shreeram V. Shirsat heard the case. While explaining the scope of the RBI framework, the...

Banks Must Examine MSME Restructuring Claims Before Proceeding Under SARFAESI: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court has recently held that once an MSME borrower raises a restructuring claim in reply to a SARFAESI demand notice, the bank cannot carry on with recovery proceedings without first taking a decision under the RBI's revival framework. Justice Krishna Rao said the obligation on the bank is mandatory when such a claim is made with reasons and an affidavit. “It is mandatory on the part of the bank that, in reply, if the borrower claims benefit of the FRAMEWORK with reasons...

Delhi High Court Orders Deutsche Bank To Refund Rs 3.45 Crore To MSME Exporter

The Delhi High Court has ordered Deutsche Bank to refund Rs 3.45 crore to an MSME exporter, M D Overseas Private Limited. The court held that the bank wrongly recovered interest subvention benefits that had already been given upfront under the Interest Equalization Scheme. A single-judge bench of Justice Amit Bansal said the bank's move defeated the purpose of the scheme. The scheme, the court noted, was meant to "enhance the global competitiveness of Indian exports by lowering the cost of...

Pendency Of Conciliation Proceedings Under MSME Act Does Not Bar Interim Relief U/S 9 Of A&C Act To Preserve Subject Matter: Calcutta HC

The Calcutta High Court has held that pendency of conciliation proceedings does not bar the grant of limited interim relief under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("Arbitration Act"), where such relief is essential to preserve the subject matter of the dispute. Justice Gaurang Kanth held while allowing a Section 9 application filed by Rishi Chemical Works Pvt. Ltd. (“Petitioner”), appointing a Special Officer to inspect, measure, and document the existing status...

Writ Petition Filed To Bypass Pre-Deposit Requirement Under MSMED Act Is Not Maintainable: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court dismissed a petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an award passed by the West Bengal Micro & Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (MSEFC), holding that the petition was not maintainable and was filed to evade pre-deposit requirement under section 19 of the MSMED Act, 2006. Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya held that the Facilitation Council had jurisdiction to entertain the reference under section 18 and the buyer (Kommoners Club...

Banks Cannot Penalise Borrowers For Switching Lenders, Prepaying Loans: Orissa High Court

The Orissa High Court recently held that banks cannot impose charges that restrict a borrower's freedom to switch lenders, ruling that such practices undermine fair banking standards and violate binding directions of the Reserve Bank of India. A bench of Justice Sanjeeb K Panigrahi said banks must operate within regulatory limits set by the RBI and cannot create barriers that penalize borrowers for exercising their right to repay or refinance loans. The bank cannot "cannot convert a...

Proceedings For Conciliation & Arbitration Under MSME Act Cannot Be Clubbed: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has set set aside two ex-parte orders passed by the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (MSEFC), Daman holding that the council acted in breach of mandatory two stage procedures under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (“MSMED Act”). The court remitted the matter for fresh arbitration in accordance with law. A bench led by Justice N.J. Jamadar held that “If the appellant had not submitted its reply at the conciliation...

Bar Against Even Number Of Arbitrators Is Not Attracted In Case Of Statutory Arbitration U/S 18(3) Of MSMED Act: Calcutta HC

A division bench of Calcutta High Court comprising Justices Uday Kumar and Sabyasachi Bhattacharya in a notable judgment has observed that the bar restricting the number of arbitrators to even numbers, which is applicable when the parties themselves appoint arbitrators under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (“ACA”), is not attracted to a statutory arbitration under Section 18(3), Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (“MSMED Act”). Thus, even if the number of...

Benefits To Registered Retail Traders Under MSMED Act Limited To Priority Sector Lending, Not Eligible For QCO Exemption: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court held that the benefits to registered retail traders under MSMED Act, 2006 (Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006) limited to priority sector lending only, and are not eligible for QCO [Plywood and Wooden flush door shutters (Quality Control) Order, 2024] exemption. Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. stated that “the entire category of wholesale and retail trades were excluded completely from the purview of MSMED Act and later, they were re-included...

MSME Council's Order Declaring Jurisdiction To Decide Dispute Between Parties Can Be Challenged Only U/S 34 Of A&C Act: Orissa High Court

The Orissa High Court bench of Justice K.R. Mohapatra has held that once the MSME Council initiates arbitration following the termination of conciliation proceedings, any order passed by the Council regarding its jurisdiction to adjudicate the dispute can only be challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The aggrieved party cannot invoke Article 227 of the Constitution to seek setting aside of an award passed under the MSMED Act. Brief Facts: M/s Odisha...