Allahabad High Court
State Gets No Special Leeway In Delay Condonation Under Arbitration Act: Allahabad High Court
The Allahabad High Court on 30 July held that government bodies are not entitled to any special concession under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and that the State and private parties are subject to the same standard for proving “sufficient cause.” A Division Bench of Justices Rajan Roy and Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary dismissed an appeal filed by the railway authorities against the Commercial Court's refusal to condone a 28 day delay in filing objections to an arbitral...
Allahabad High Court Seeks Centre's Response On GST Appellate Tribunal Vacancies In Uttar Pradesh
The Allahabad High Court has sought an affidavit from the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India detailing the efforts being made to fill vacancies in the GST Appellate Tribunal benches in Uttar Pradesh. In a petition filed by S.S. Pharma, the issue of GST appellate tribunals not sitting was brought before the High Court. Justice Piyush Agrawal had directed the state counsels to seek instructions on the appointments, sittings, and disposal of cases by the Appellate...
Allahabad High Court Partly Sets Aside ₹157.57 Cr Arbitral Award Against U.P. State Highways Authority
The Allahabad High Court on 23 July held that a financial model based on assumptions cannot, by itself, quantify a claim for loss of profits in arbitration, and set aside the Rs. 157.57 crore loss of profits award against the U.P. State Highways Authority. A Division Bench of Chief Justice Arun Bhansali and Justice Jaspreet Singh partly allowed the Authority's appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, severed the loss of profits component of the arbitral award,...
Foreign Award Enforcement Can't Be Refused For Ignoring Contract Or Proof Burden Shift: Allahabad HC
The Allahabad High Court on 13 July held that courts cannot refuse to enforce a foreign arbitral award under Section 48(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (which sets out the limited grounds for refusing enforcement of a foreign award) merely because they disagree with the arbitral tribunal's appreciation of evidence or findings or the burden of proof. A Bench of Justice Piyush Agrawal allowed the enforcement application filed by Fomento Commodities PTE. Ltd. and directed...
Allahabad High Court Upholds Setting Aside Of Arbitral Award For Lack Of Findings On Contentious Issues
The Allahabad High Court has upheld the setting aside of an arbitral award in an insurance dispute after finding that the arbitrator failed to record findings on key disputed issues, including the validity of the survey report and the basis for awarding the claimed amount, and instead "jumped to the conclusion" that the insured was entitled to the amount sought.A Division Bench of Chief Justice Arun Bhansali and Justice Kshitij Shailendra dismissed an appeal by Triveni Adhesive and Tapes against...
HSNS Cess Act | Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest After Finding Authorisation Was Issued A Day Later
The Allahabad High Court has set aside the arrest, remand and detention of a man taken into custody under the Health Security Se National Security Cess Act, 2025, holding that the arrest could not be sustained when the written authorisation to arrest him was issued by the Commissioner only a day after he had been picked up.The HSNS Cess Act imposes a monthly cess on manufacturers of specified goods to fund national security and public health The court also held that the arrest memo did...
Allahabad High Court Flags Loophole In Income Tax Law On Reassessment After Taxpayer's Death
While holding that a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act cannot be issued in the name of a dead assessee, the Allahabad High Court at Lucknow recently observed that the Act contains a legislative lacuna because it leaves the Revenue unable to initiate reassessment proceedings where an assessee dies before a valid reassessment notice is issued. Holding that the gap could result in escaped income going untaxed and prejudice the public exchequer, the court observed that...
Revenue Cannot Appeal Assessment Order Under Income Tax Act, Can Only Seek Revision: Allahabad High Court
The Allahabad High Court has recently held that under the Income Tax Act, 1961, the revenue has no right of appeal against an assessment order, as the assessment order is the stated case of the revenue itself. It held that where the revenue is aggrieved by an assessment order, its remedy is to seek revision where the assessment order is found to be "erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of revenue." The court held that in an assessment proceeding the Assessing Authority...
Registration Of Customs Appeal Cannot Be Refused For Non-Payment Of Pre-Deposit: Allahabad High Court
The Allahabad High Court has held that an appellate authority cannot refuse to register an appeal merely because the appellant has not made the mandatory pre-deposit under Section 129E of the Customs Act, holding that the statutory requirement applies only at the stage of "entertaining" the appeal and not at the stage of its filing or registration. A Division Bench of Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi disposed of a writ petition filed by Runway Impex, directing the...
Transit State Lacks Jurisdiction To Levy GST Penalty Without Taxable Transaction: Allahabad High Court
The Allahabad High Court has held that a State through which goods merely transit cannot invoke Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, to detain goods and levy penalty for the absence of an e-tax invoice where no taxable transaction takes place within that State. A Division Bench of Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi on 14 May allowed a writ petition filed by Maruti Enterprises and connected matters, holding that the Uttar Pradesh GST authorities lacked...
GST Writ Petition Not Maintainable After Statutory Appeal Limitation Expires: Allahabad High Court
The Allahabad High Court has held that a taxpayer cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to bypass the statutory limitation period prescribed for filing an appeal under the GST Act, refusing to entertain a challenge to an assessment order filed after the expiry of the appellate limitation period. A Division Bench comprising Justices Shekhar B. Saraf and Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary dismissed a writ petition filed by Mishra Security Services, holding that entertaining the petition would undermine the...








