Delhi High Court Sets Aside Refusal Of Jindal Steel's 'JSP' Trademark, Orders Fresh Consideration

The Delhi High Court has partially allowed an appeal filed by Jindal Steel Limited against an order of the Registrar of Trade Marks refusing registration of the trademark “JSP,” holding that the decision was a “non-speaking order” passed without considering the arguments and material placed on record. In a judgment delivered on February 17, 2026, Justice Jyoti Singh observed that the Registrar had failed to consider several issues raised by the company, including its reliance on Sections 34 and...

Madras High Court Upholds Notification Applying Excise Act Recovery Provision To Clean Environment Cess

The Madras High Court has upheld a Central Government notification applying provisions of the Central Excise Act, including those governing recovery of duties not levied or short-paid, to Clean Environment Cess. A Division Bench of Justice G. R. Swaminathan and Justice R. Kalaimathi held that the expression “levy” in the Finance Act, 2010 includes the processes of assessment and collection, allowing the government to extend recovery provisions of the Central Excise Act to the cess through...

Affiliation Fees Collected By Universities From Colleges Liable To GST: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that affiliation fees collected by universities from colleges are liable to Goods and Services Tax (GST). The Court ruled that such services do not fall within the GST exemption for services relating to the admission of students or the conduct of examinations.The Division Bench comprising Justice G. Jayachandran and Justice K. K. Ramakrishnan answered a reference arising from writ petitions filed by Bharathidasan University challenging GST notices issued by the...

SARFAESI Action Does Not Bar Civil Court From Hearing Partition Suit: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has held that civil courts retain jurisdiction to adjudicate partition suits involving secured assets, observing that the Debts Recovery Tribunal cannot grant such relief even where proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI) have been initiated. A Single Bench of Justice N.J. Jamadar observed that, “The Tribunal, thus, cannot transgress its jurisdictional limits and delve into the...

Delhi High Court Bars Ex-Franchisee From Using 'Moti Mahal' Trademark After Franchise Termination

The Delhi High Court has granted an ex-parte ad interim injunction in favour of Moti Mahal Legendary Hospitality, restraining Sant Foods, a former franchisee, from using the “MOTI MAHAL” trademark after the termination of their commercial agreement. The Court observed that once a franchise agreement is terminated, the former franchisee retains no legal right to operate a restaurant using the trademarked name.On February 25, 2026, Justice Jyoti Singh observed that the company had established...

Dissenting Flat Owner Not Bound By Arbitration Clause In Redevelopment Agreement He Refused To Sign: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court recently refused to appoint an arbitrator in a dispute arising out of a housing redevelopment project in Mumbai, holding that a dissenting flat owner who had deliberately refused to sign the development agreement could not be compelled to arbitrate claims brought by the developer. Justice Sandeep V. Marne observed that arbitration is founded on consent and that the mere fact that redevelopment arrangements involve multiple interconnected agreements cannot bind a...

Madras High Court Protects '777 Oil' Trademark, Sets Aside Order Dismissing Infringement Suit

The Madras High Court on Friday protected the trademark “777 Oil” used for a Siddha medicinal oil to treat psoriasis, setting aside a single judge's decision that had dismissed an infringement suit filed by J.R.K's Research and Pharmaceuticals against Sanjeevi Pharma. In a judgment pronounced on March 6, 2026, Justice C.V. Karthikeyan and Justice K. Kumaresh Babu allowed the company's appeal, holding that the earlier judgment suffered from “perversity,” and decreed the suit with a permanent...

Limitation For TDS Default Orders Runs Quarter-Wise, Not Annually: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has recently held that limitation for passing an order treating a person responsible for deducting tax at source as an “assessee in default” under Section 201 of the Income Tax Act must be computed quarter-wise based on the filing of each TDS statement, and not on an annual or cumulative basis. A Division Bench of Justice M.S. Karnik and Justice Gautam A. Ankhad on March 5, 2026 dismissed the Income Tax Department's appeal against Vodafone Cellular Ltd., Pune. In doing...

Madras High Court Rejects Lahari Recording's Claim Over Satellite Telecast of Telugu-Dubbed 'Roja'

The Madras High Court has dismissed appeals filed by Lahari Recording Co. Pvt. Ltd. over the satellite telecast of the Telugu-dubbed version of Roja, the Mani Ratnam-directed Tamil film that became one of Indian cinema's most recognisable titles of the 1990s. The company had sought to block the broadcast and claim Rs 1 crore in damages, arguing that the telecast infringed its rights in the dubbed version. A division bench of Justice C.V. Karthikeyan and Justice K. Kumaresh Babu, in a judgment...

Assignment Of Leasehold Rights Is Transfer of Immovable Property, Not Taxable as GST Supply: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur, recently following a Gujarat High Court ruling, has held that assignment of leasehold rights in an industrial plot amounts to transfer of benefits arising out of immovable property and does not constitute “supply of services” under the GST law, and therefore GST cannot be levied on such transactions. A division bench of Justices Anil L. Pansare and Nivedita P. Mehta passed the ruling while allowing a writ petition filed by Vidarbha Beverages and its partners...

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Customs Orders On IGST Refund Interest To Jindal Drugs, Directs Fresh Determination

The Bombay High Court has recently set aside orders passed by customs authorities determining the interest payable on an IGST refund to Jindal Drugs Pvt. Ltd., holding that the authorities failed to explain how the interest had been calculated under Section 56 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. A division bench of Justice G. S. Kulkarni and Justice Aarti Sathe found that the impugned orders contained no reasoning showing that the statutory provision governing interest on delayed...

Participation Cannot Cure Ineligibility: Bombay High Court Sets Aside Awards By Unilaterally Appointed Arbitrator

The Bombay High Court has recently reiterated that arbitral awards passed by an arbitrator unilaterally appointed by one party are liable to be set aside and that such illegality cannot be cured merely because the opposing party participated in the arbitration proceedings without raising an objection. Applying the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Bhadra International (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Airports Authority of India, the court further reiterated that waiver of an arbitrator's ineligibility under...