Tax
Redemption Fine Under Central Excise Law Does Not Bar Sabka Vishwas Scheme Relief: Rajasthan High Court
The Rajasthan High Court has held that taxpayers whose goods were confiscated under the Central Excise law and who were directed to pay a redemption fine in lieu of confiscation are not excluded from the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019.It ruled that they cannot be treated as ineligible to file declarations under the Scheme merely because they were liable to pay a redemption fine.A division bench of Justice Arun Monga and Justice Maneesh Sharma passed the ruling while...
Revised Return Filed After Income Tax Inspection Cannot Shield Dealer From Sales Tax Penalty: Madras High Court
The Madras High Court has upheld Income tax additions and penalty against a dealer, holding that a revised return filed after an Income Tax inspection cannot protect a taxpayer from the consequences of suppressed turnover.It observed that a revised return filed after detection does not automatically establish bona fide conduct or protect a taxpayer from penalty."The revised return filed subsequent to Income Tax inspection cannot be a protection blanket for the tax evaders. Even if the Trader...
Madras High Court Directs GST Authorities To Adjust Tax Paid Under Wrong Head Instead Of Seeking Fresh Payment
The Madras High Court has directed the GST authorities to adjust tax already paid under the wrong tax head instead of requiring the taxpayer to make a fresh payment before claiming a refund. It held that a taxpayer who has discharged the entire tax liability within time cannot be penalised merely because the amount was inadvertently deposited under the wrong GST head.Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy disposed of the writ petition filed by SYA Homes and set aside the rectification order to the...
Salaries Paid By Foreign Bank's Head Office To Expatriates Working For Indian Branch Not Head Office Expenses: ITAT Mumbai
Salary paid by the head office of a foreign bank to expatriate employees working exclusively for its Indian operations cannot be treated as head office expenditure merely because the payment was initially made outside India, the Mumbai Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held. A bench of Judicial Member Beena Pillai and Accountant Member Arun Khodpia dismissed the Revenue's appeal. It upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)' order allowing Standard Chartered Bank's claim for deduction of...
CESTAT Mumbai Allows YRF Studios' CENVAT Credit On Studio Repair and Renovation Works
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has recently allowed YRF Studios to claim CENVAT credit on service tax paid for repair, renovation, and strengthening works carried out on its existing studio buildings. It held that the services were used for maintaining infrastructure from which the company's taxable output services were provided and were not covered by the exclusion applicable to construction services.The appeal was decided by Technical Member...
Karnataka High Court Upholds Deletion Of Tax Addition On Advances Received By Businessman Procuring Land
The Karnataka High Court has upheld the deletion of a ₹21.11 crore tax addition made against a Bengaluru-based businessman engaged in identifying and procuring land for real estate projects. The court held that advances received in the course of that business cannot be taxed merely because they remained outstanding for several years.The court observed that the mere passage of time does not amount to forfeiture, and such advances cannot be treated as taxable income in the absence of material...
Service Tax Refund For SEZ Can't Be Denied If Services Were Used For Authorised Operations: CESTAT Chennai
The Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) unit cannot be denied a refund of service tax merely because the services were not consumed within the geographical limits of the SEZ, so long as they were used for authorised operations. A single-member tribunal of Technical Member Rajeev Tandon allowed an appeal filed by ATC Tires Private Limited. "It is clear from a bare reading of Section 26(1)(e) that the...
Telangana High Court Upholds Capital Gains Tax Exemption Despite Delay In Villa Registration
The Telangana High Court has held that a taxpayer who invested capital gains in a residential villa under a joint development agreement cannot be denied tax exemption merely because the developer delayed construction and execution of the sale deed. The court observed that delays beyond the assessee's control cannot defeat the benefit intended under the law. A Division Bench of Justice P. Sam Koshy and Justice Narsing Rao Nandikonda allowed the appeal filed by non-resident Indian Sudhakar...
Madras High Court Upholds Sales Tax Demand Against Ford India Over Breach of Exemption Conditions
The Madras High Court has upheld the levy of Tamil Nadu sales tax on Ford India, holding that the company breached the conditions of a state government notification granting a sales tax exemption on purchases of goods used for manufacturing passenger cars after availing the benefit by furnishing declarations.The dispute relates to the 2001-02 assessment yearThe exemption under G.O. Ms. No. 381 covered purchases of goods used in the manufacture, assembling, packing and labelling of passenger cars...
Gauhati High Court Rejects Hawkins Cookers' Plea To Compute VAT On Reduced Sale Price
The Gauhati High Court has held that Hawkins Cookers Ltd. must pay the balance 8.5% Value Added Tax (VAT) on the original sale price of pressure cookers after an earlier ruling held that the products attracted VAT at 12.5% before 2010 and not 4% as claimed by the company. Dismissing six revision petitions, the court rejected Hawkins' contention that the original sale consideration should be treated as inclusive of 12.5% VAT while computing the additional tax liabilityThe controversy was...
Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Order Uploaded A Day After Limitation Expired
The Calcutta High Court has upheld a GST adjudication order even though its summary was uploaded on the common portal a day after the limitation period expired. The court held that the statutory limitation applies to the issuance of the order and not to its subsequent service. Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury dismissed a writ petition filed by M. M. Motors and another challenging an adjudication order for the 2018–19 tax period. The petitioners argued that the adjudication order could not be treated...