Delhi HC Sets Aside GST Demand Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Unserved SCN

The Delhi High Court has recently set aside a GST demand order after finding that the show cause notice (SCN) was not effectively served on the assessee, holding that a reminder issued in respect of such an SCN cannot be treated as a valid communication.A bench of Justices Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Ajay Digpaul thus set aside a GST demand order after finding that the SCN had not been properly communicated to the petitioner.Petitioner challenged the demand order issued under Section 73 of the...

Delhi HC Refuses To Order Third Re-Test Of Shawls For Export, Says Decision Lies With Adjudicating Authority

The Delhi High Court has recently declined to direct a third re-test of goods under Customs proceedings, holding that such a request cannot be insisted upon at the mere instance of a party and that the decision lies within the discretion of the adjudicating authority, particularly where two test reports are already on record.A bench of Justices Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Ajay Digpaul dismissed a writ petition filed by an exporter seeking the quashing of a show cause notice and a direction for...

Delhi HC Dismisses Plea Against Customs Order, Says Non-Communication Of Adjudication Time Extension Not Fatal

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday dismissed writ petitions challenging adjudication proceedings under the Customs Act, holding that non-communication of an order extending time for adjudication does not, by itself, vitiate the proceedings.A bench of Justices Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Ajay Digpaul relied on Pranij Heights India Pvt. Ltd. v. The Joint Commissioner of Customs where it was held that although as a matter of prudence the Customs Department ought to intimate the grant of extension to the...

IT Appellate Authority Must Pass Speaking Order, Hear AO Before Admitting Fresh Evidence: J&K&L High Court

The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has recently held that an appellate authority under the Income Tax law cannot allow a taxpayer to file fresh evidence at the appeal stage without first passing a reasoned order and giving the tax officer a fair chance to respond. A bench of Justice Sanjeev Kumar and Justice Sanjay Parihar said, “We are also of the clear view that the opportunity to lead additional evidence at the appellate stage could not be granted by the First Appellate Authority...

CIT(A) Cannot Introduce New Income Source While Enhancing Assessment: ITAT Mumbai

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) cannot enhance income by introducing a new source of income that the Assessing Officer (AO) did not examine during assessment. It ruled that enhancement powers do not extend to issues beyond the scope of the original assessment.The Bench comprising Vice President Saktijit Dey and Accountant Member Arun Khodpia allowed Skyline Greathills' appeal on the Work-in-Progress (WIP) enhancement...

ITAT Delhi Upholds Deletion Of ₹10.5 Crore Addition Based On Retracted Statement In Oppo Search Case

The New Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on 17 April upheld the deletion of a Rs. 10.5 crore addition made solely on the basis of a retracted statement recorded during search proceedings, holding that such statements, in the absence of corroborative evidence, cannot by themselves sustain an addition under the Income-tax Act. A Bench comprising Judicial Member Anubhav Sharma and Accountant Member Manish Agarwal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and affirmed the order of the...

Reassessment Notices Invalid Where No Escaped Income In Form Of 'Asset' Above ₹50 Lakh: ITAT New Delhi

The New Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on 17 April, held that reassessment proceedings initiated beyond three years are invalid unless the Revenue demonstrates that the alleged escaped income is represented in the form of an “asset” exceeding Rs. 50 lakh, as required under Section 149(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act. A Bench comprising Judicial Member Anubhav Sharma and Accountant Member Manish Agarwal quashed reassessment notices issued under Section 148 in the case of...

Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Direction Making Customs Dept. Liable For Demurrage In Austin Engineering Dispute

The Supreme Court has recently set aside a Madras High Court ruling that had required the Customs Department to bear demurrage charges in a dispute with Austin Engineering Co. Ltd. These charges are levied by port authorities when imported goods remain in storage beyond the permitted period.The court made it clear that such liability cannot be placed on customs unless there is clear evidence of mala fides or a gross abuse of power. A bench of Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice Prasanna B. Varale...

CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit On Insurance, Forex Hedging, Employee Training For National Engineering Industries

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has allowed the appeal filed by National Engineering Industries Ltd., setting aside the denial of CENVAT credit on insurance services, forex hedging consultancy, and employee training and travel-related services, holding that these were used in relation to its manufacturing business.The case was decided by Judicial Member Dr. Rachna Gupta, who found that the services in question were connected, directly or indirectly,...

CESTAT Sets Aside ₹3.63 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand Against India Cements Over Imported Coal

In a relief to cement major The India Cements Ltd., the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai has set aside a Rs.3.63 crore CENVAT credit demand along with interest and penalty, holding that credit cannot be denied merely because Countervailing Duty (CVD) was paid at concessional rates on imported steam coal.A Chennai bench of Judicial Member Ajayan T.V. and Technical Member Vasa Seshagiri Rao allowed the company's appeal against an Order-in-Original dated...

Hypothecation Agreements Attract Stamp Duty As General Agreements, Not Pledge Or Mortgage: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has held that a hypothecation agreement executed to secure a loan attracts stamp duty as a general agreement under Article 5(g) of the Kerala Stamp Act and not as a pledge or mortgage, which attracts higher duty. Clarifying the position, the court said Article 6 of the Act applies only to pledges. “Article 6 of the Act will get attracted only if the instrument in question is a 'pledge'. On a conspectus reading of the agreement of hypothecation, it is evident that the...

ITAT Chennai Deletes ₹49.80 Lakh Additions On Flat Purchase And Cash Deposits, Allows Reinvestment Benefit

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Chennai has recently deleted additions of Rs.49.80 lakh and Rs.10.80 lakh made against a taxpayer after finding that her investment in a new flat and cash deposits were wrongly treated as unexplained, despite being traceable to the sale of her earlier property and household items. A bench of Judicial Member Aby T. Varkey and Accountant Member S.R. Raghunatha held, “We thus find that the addition made by the AO u/s 69A was without any basis and on...