Tax
Procuring Authority Liable For Differential GST In Government Contracts: Madras High Court Reiterates
Reiterating that additional GST arising from the rollout of the GST regime in government works contracts must be borne by the procuring authority, the Madras High Court has directed the Tamil Nadu Housing Board to consider a contractor's claim for reimbursement of differential tax.A Bench of Justice N Sathish Kumar relying on settled law, held that contractors cannot be fastened with liability for differential GST, interest, or penalties when tax was discharged strictly in accordance...
IGST Refund Claims Cannot Be Rejected Under Omitted Law: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has held that refund claims cannot be thrown out on the basis of a statutory rule that no longer exists and must be looked at afresh once such a rule is omitted (deleted) without any saving clause. The court set aside orders rejecting Integrated Goods and Services Tax refunds claimed by Kelvion India Private Limited and sent the matter back to the tax department for a fresh decision. A Division Bench of Justice M S Sonak and Justice Advait M Sethna noted that the...
CESTAT Delhi Allows Importer To Claim Tax-Free Imports From Least Developed Countries Despite Licence Terms
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that Customs authorities cannot deny duty-free benefits available to imports from Least Developed Countries merely because an import licence issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade refers to a separate concessional duty notification. A coram of President Justice Dilip Gupta and Technical Member P.V. Subba Rao set aside a customs duty demand, along with interest, penalty, and redemption fine,...
CESTAT Mumbai Reiterates 10% Customs Duty Benefit On Enterprise Ethernet Switches
Reiterating that customs authorities cannot deny a concessional duty without objective evidence, the Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has allowed Digisol Systems' appeal and extended the benefit of 10% customs duty on imported enterprise Ethernet switches and transceivers.A bench comprising Judicial Member S.K. Mohanty and Technical Member M.M. Prathiban was hearing an appeal filed by Digisol Systems, a provider of IT networking solutions and consultancy...
Kerala General Sales Tax Act | Once Limitation Lapses, Assessment Cannot Be Revived: Kerala High Court
The Kerala High Court has held that assessment proceedings initiated beyond the statutory limitation period under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (KGST Act), are unsustainable in law and liable to be set aside. Justice Harisankar V. Menon noted that the pre-assessment notice under Section 17(3) of the KGST Act was issued against Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. for the assessment year 2007–08 only on August 25, 2017. The assessment order was passed later, on January 28, 2019. This was...
GST Notices And Orders Issued Only In Summary Forms Without Details Are Unsustainable: Calcutta High Court
The Calcutta High Court has quashed a GST adjudication order passed solely through summary online forms, holding that tax liability cannot be imposed without clearly setting out the allegations and reasons as required under law. A single-judge bench of Justice Om Narayan Rai said the manner in which the proceedings were conducted could not be sustained. “The order that has been passed and communicated to the petitioner has remained in summary form. It is bereft of any detail and sans any...
Karnataka HC Quashes GST Refund Rejection, Says Limitation Runs From Original Application, Not Revised Filing
The Karnataka High Court has quashed the rejection of a GST refund claim as time-barred, holding that the limitation period must be computed from the date on which the taxpayer originally applied for the refund and not from a revised application filed after a deficiency memo. The bench of Justice S R Krishna Kumar observed that, in the instant case, the refund application filed on July 4, 2024 was well within the prescribed limitation period and that a subsequent application filed pursuant to a...
Bombay High Court Quashes Special Audit Order For Want Of Mandatory DIN
The Bombay High Court has held that an approval for a special audit issued without a Document Identification Number (DIN) is invalid and deemed never to have been issued. A Division Bench of Justice B P Colabawalla and Justice Firdosh P Pooniwalla allowed a writ petition filed by assessee Sanjay Nathalal Shah and quashed a special audit ordered for Assessment Year 2023–24 . Relying on a CBDT circular issued in August 2019, which mandates that every communication, including statutory approvals,...
Stamp Duty Must Be Refunded If Sale Agreement Was Never Executed : Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has held that stamp duty paid for a property transaction that never went through must be refunded, even if the application is filed beyond the six-month limitation period under the law. A single-judge bench of Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan said the state cannot keep money collected as stamp duty when no sale agreement was ever executed. “Stamp Duty is not a transaction tax but a duty payable on an instrument, which necessarily has to conform to the definition set out in...
ITAT Delhi Quashes Revision Order, Says Tax Dept. Cannot Expand Limited Scrutiny Assessment
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, has quashed a revision order passed against an individual taxpayer, holding that the tax department cannot expand a limited scrutiny assessment by invoking its revisionary powers.A coram comprising Judicial Member Yogesh Kumar U.S. Accountant Member S. Rifa'ur Rahman held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax had wrongly invoked Section 263 of the Income Tax Act which allows revision of an assessment only if it is both erroneous and...
Income Tax Dept Cannot Reopen Assessment on New Grounds Without Due Notice: Calcutta High Court
The Calcutta High Court has recently held that the income tax department cannot reopen a completed assessment by raising new issues without first following the mandatory procedure under the Income Tax Act. On this basis, the court set aside the reassessment notice issued against a government-owned company. Under the tax law, Sections 148 and 148A require the department to first issue a detailed notice explaining why it believes income may have escaped tax, give the taxpayer an opportunity to...