Delhi High Court Refers Suit Alleging Copyright Infringement To Arbitration As Dispute Stems From Agreement

The Delhi High Court has recently referred to arbitration a commercial suit alleging copyright infringement and diversion of business after holding that the dispute, in the facts of the case, arose from the parties' contractual collaboration. Justice Tejas Karia passed the order while allowing an application filed under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking reference of the dispute to arbitration. The suit had been filed by Terix Computer Service India Pvt. Ltd., which...

Single Judicial Member Of NCLT Can Pass Orders If Authorised By President: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on 18 February, held that a Single Member of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) can pass orders if the President of the Tribunal specifically authorises them under the proviso to Section 419(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. A Bench of Justice Viju Abraham dismissed a writ petition challenging orders passed by a Single Judicial Member of the NCLT, Kochi Bench, upholding the validity of the directions. The Court observed: “It is also to be noted that though Section 419...

Approval Of Insolvency Resolution Plan Not An Automatic Bar To Arbitration: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court on 26 February held that approval of a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Plan does not automatically bar disputes from being referred to arbitration. Where a valid arbitration agreement exists, any objections concerning the impact of the Resolution Plan on the claims must be adjudicated by the arbitral tribunal under Section 16, and cannot be considered at the appointment stage under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Single Bench comprising...

Single Judge Cannot Disregard Rulings Of Division Bench Under Guise Of Reference: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on Wednesday held that a Single Judge is bound by decisions of Division Benches and Full Benches and cannot question or disregard a binding Division Bench ruling under the guise of making a reference. A Division Bench of Chief Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Syam Kumar V.M was dealing with a reference arising from a writ petition filed by Grids Engineers and Contractors, challenging proceedings initiated by Union Bank of India under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The Bench...

Tax Evasion Prosecution Not Liable To Be Terminated If IT Penalty Set Aside On Technical Grounds: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has reiterated that criminal prosecutions for alleged tax evasion under the Income Tax Act do not automatically fail merely because penalty proceedings were set aside on technical grounds, and that such prosecutions can validly continue where allegations disclose wilful and deliberate concealment of income. The ruling was delivered by Justice G. Girish while dismissing a batch of criminal miscellaneous petitions filed by Dr. P.H. Abdul Majeed, who had sought the quashing...

Taxpayer Cannot Escape Prosecution By Filing Revised Returns Post-Search: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on 20 February held that filing revised income tax returns after a search and seizure operation does not absolve a taxpayer from criminal prosecution for wilful tax evasion, and that such revised returns cannot be used as a shield against offences punishable under the Income Tax Act, 1961. Justice G. Girish, dismissed a batch of petitions filed by a medical practitioner challenging prosecutions pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Economic Offences),...

Bank Cannot Cancel Confirmed Auction Sale Due To Pending DRT Proceedings: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on 3 March held that a bank cannot unilaterally set aside a confirmed auction sale merely because proceedings challenging the sale are pending before the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT). A Division Bench of Justice Anil K Narendran and Justice Muralee Krishna S was considering an appeal filed by the legal heirs of Vinod M.A., an auction purchaser. The Court stated: “It is trite that the authorised officer of the Bank cannot set aside the sale which was already confirmed in...

Deemed Conveyance Orders Passed Before 2025 Amendment Of MOFA Remain Valid: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court on 23 February held that deemed conveyance orders under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act (MOFA), 1963, issued prior to the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Amendment and Validation) Act, 2025, remain valid and cannot be reopened merely because the amendment now aligns deemed conveyance in RERA-registered projects with completion of the last building in a layout. Dismissing a challenge by the developer, a Single Bench comprising Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh upheld a 2023...

Assessment Order Against Deceased Person Without Hearing Legal Heirs Invalid: Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court on 26 February, held that assessment proceedings cannot be validly continued or concluded against the legal heirs of a deceased taxpayer under Section 93 of the CGST Act, which limits liability to the estate inherited, unless the authorities comply with mandatory principles of natural justice, including issuance of a proper notice and grant of an opportunity of hearing to the legal representative. A Bench of Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Justice...

Conciliation Under MSMED Act Is Mandatory, Cannot Be Waived By Parties: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on 27 February held that the statutory mandate of conciliation under Section 18(2) of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 cannot be waived by a party to proceedings before the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council. A Division Bench of Justice Anil K Narendran and Justice Muralee Krishna S allowed a writ appeal filed by Malabar Social Service and Sanitation (MASSS) and set aside the judgment of the Single Judge which had quashed an award...

Absence Of Physical Signature Does Not Invalidate Arbitration Agreement If Correspondence Shows Reliance On It: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has recently refused to set aside an ex-parte arbitral award arising out of a commercial toy retail franchise dispute, holding that the absence of a physical signature on a contract would not invalidate the arbitrator's finding that an arbitration agreement existed, particularly where correspondence between the parties indicated reliance on the agreement. A single bench of Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan observed that “the absence of an actual physical signature would not...

General Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked Directly For Breach Of Arbitral Interim Orders: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court on 5 February held that parties cannot bypass the arbitral process by approaching the High Court directly for alleged violation of an interim order passed by an arbitral tribunal. Any contempt proceedings must follow the procedural framework under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Justice Saurabh Banerjee dismissed a contempt petition filed by Renaissance Buildcon Company Pvt Ltd and its directors, while noting that the respondents, Tarjinder Kumar Bansal and...