Taxation Of Virtual Digital Assets Doesn't Subject Crypto Exchanges To Public Law Scrutiny: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has recently held that the taxation of Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs) under the Finance Act, 2022 does not make cryptocurrency exchanges "State" under Article 12 of the Constitution or, by itself, subject them to public law scrutiny.A division bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia thus dismissed an appeal filed by users of cryptocurrency exchange platform BitBNS, seeking CBI or SIT probe into the alleged withdrawal restrictions.For context,...

CESTAT Chennai Sets Aside Customs Duty Demand After Royalty Was Added To Import Value

The Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set aside a customs duty demand that arose after royalty payments were added to the transaction value of imported raw materials. The tribunal followed its earlier ruling in the same company's case after finding that the Revenue had not shown any change in facts, produced any new document, or established any change in law to justify taking a different view. The bench of Judicial Member P. Dinesha and...

No Service Tax On Reimbursement Of Actual Electricity Charges Recovered From Tenants: CESTAT Chennai

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that reimbursement of actual electricity charges recovered from tenants is not liable to service tax, observing that electricity is "goods" and such recoveries cannot be treated as consideration for a taxable service. The tribunal observed, “Further, eelectricity is specifically recognized as "goods" under the Central Excise Tariff Act and various State VAT laws. Hence reimbursements or collections...

Madras HC Upholds Jurisdiction Of Assessing Officers To Issue Reassessment Notices Under Income Tax Act

The Madras High Court has held that Jurisdictional Assessing Officers have the authority to issue reassessment notices under Sections 148A, 148 and 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, observing that the retrospective insertion of Section 147A has clarified their jurisdiction to initiate proceedings for income escaping assessment. Justice C. Saravanan dismissed a batch of writ petitions challenging reassessment proceedings initiated by Jurisdictional Assessing Officers, holding that the petitioners...

Madras High Court Holds Employer Cannot Grant Section 89 Tax Relief Without Form 10E From Employees

The Madras High Court on 24 June held that employers deducting Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) on voluntary retirement compensation cannot be faulted for not granting relief under Section 89 of the Income Tax Act (relief for salary received in arrears or advance) unless employees submit the prescribed Form 10E. Justice C. Saravanan allowed the writ petition filed by the Hosur Bata Employees Union in part and directed the Income Tax Department to process the income tax returns of affected employees...

Gujarat HC Holds PLA Payment Cannot Result In Double Recovery, Directs ₹3.74 Cr. Credit Restoration

The Gujarat High Court on 24 June held that the Central Excise Department cannot require a taxpayer to claim a cash refund after the taxpayer has already deposited the disputed duty amount through the Personal Ledger Account (PLA), as the corresponding CENVAT credit must be restored to prevent double recovery. A Division Bench of Justices A.S. Supehia and Vaibhavi D. Nanavati allowed the writ petition filed by Inductotherm India Pvt. Ltd. and directed the Department to re-credit Rs. 3,74,33,462...

Separately Sold Study Material And Student Fee Waivers Not Taxable To Service Tax: CESTAT New Delhi

The New Delhi Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 6 July held that coaching institutes do not have to pay Service Tax on the value of study material sold separately or on scholarships and fee concessions granted to students. Service Tax applies only to the coaching fee actually collected from students and not to amounts that the institute never charged or recovered. Judicial Member Binu Tamta and Technical Member P.V. Subba Rao allowed an appeal filed by FIIT JEE...

ITAT Ahmedabad Holds Shell Company Allegation Alone Cannot Justify ₹44.49 Crore Section 68 Addition

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on 6 July held that the Income Tax Department cannot treat loans received by a company as unexplained cash credits merely on the basis of allegations that the lender companies are shell entities, when the taxpayer has furnished evidence establishing their identity, financial capacity and genuineness of the transactions. Judicial Member Sanjay Garg and Accountant Member Narendra Prasad Sinha upheld the order of the Commissioner of...

Madras High Court Holds ITC Claim Based On Fabricated Agreement Invalid, Upholds GST Demand

The Madras High Court on 30 June held that input tax credit (ITC) cannot be claimed on the basis of a fabricated contractual arrangement, where the agreement and supporting invoices do not establish a genuine business transaction. Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy dismissed two writ petitions filed by a proprietorship challenging GST assessment orders for financial years 2022-23 and 2023-24, thereby upholding the demand of tax, interest and penalty confirmed under Section 74 of the GST...

Belated Allegation Of Coercion Cannot Justify GST Refund After Voluntary Payment: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court on 25 June held that a taxpayer cannot claim a refund of GST, interest and penalty voluntarily paid during search proceedings by alleging coercion nearly two years later, ruling that the belated allegation was merely an afterthought to secure a refund and that the delayed issuance of Form GST DRC-04 acknowledging the voluntary payment did not invalidate the proceedings. A Division Bench of Justices A.S. Supehia and Vaibhavi D. Nanavati dismissed the writ petition filed...

CESTAT Chennai Quashes ₹2.32 Crore Service Tax Demand On Non-AC Restaurant Sections In Same Establishment

The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai, has set aside a service tax demand of ₹2.32 crore against a Coimbatore-based restaurant chain. It held that the chain was not liable to pay service tax on food and beverages served in the physically demarcated non-air-conditioned sections of its establishments. A tribunal comprising Judicial Member Ajayan T.V. and Technical Member M. Ajit Kumar allowed the appeals filed by Sree Annapoorna Sree Gowrishankar Hotels Pvt....

CESTAT Allahabad Sets Aside Gold Seizure, Finds Customs Relied On Unreliable Panchnama And Retracted Statements

The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside a customs order confiscating gold jewellery and bullion. It held that the panchnama forming the foundation of the case was unreliable because the Department failed to substantiate it by examining the panch witnesses. A bench of Judicial Member P.K. Choudhary and Technical Member P. Anjani Kumar held that the Revenue's case also rested on statements that had been retracted at the first available...