WhatsApp Acknowledgment Of Arbitral Award Shows Acceptance, Bars Delayed Challenge: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a challenge to an interim arbitral award after finding that the party seeking to set it aside had acknowledged receiving it on WhatsApp, participated in discussions on its implementation, and acted upon it before questioning the award only after execution proceedings were initiated. The court held that the challenge to the interim arbitral award, raised more than two years after the petitioner admittedly acquired knowledge of it was barred by...

CESTAT Kolkata Sets Aside ₹6.25 Lakh Service Tax Demand Based Solely On Annual Income Tax Statement

The Kolkata bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set aside a service tax demand of ₹6.25 lakh raised against an assessee after finding that the Department issued a show cause notice solely on the basis of Form 26AS (an income tax statement reflecting tax deducted at source and certain specified financial transactions) without carrying out any independent verification or investigation. The tribunal ultimately quashed the demand on the ground of limitation....

Taxpayer Cannot Invoke Section 73(4B) Limitation After Delaying Service Tax Proceedings: P&H High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on 2 July held that the one year period prescribed under Section 73(4B) of the Finance Act, 1994 for passing adjudication orders in cases involving the extended period of limitation is not mandatory in all circumstances and cannot be invoked by a taxpayer whose own conduct caused delay in the proceedings. A Division Bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Ashwani Kumar Mishra and Justice Rohit Kapoor dismissed the appeal filed by Sanjay Verma, an architect and...

Imported Aluminium Panels Used In Mivan Formwork Not 'Moulds' For CENVAT Credit: CESTAT Bengaluru

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 7 July held that aluminium panels imported for use in Mivan formwork cannot be treated as “moulds” for availing Cenvat credit merely because they are assembled into mould-like structures after import. Judicial Member P. A. Augustian and Technical Member R. Bhagya Devi allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue against an order granting Cenvat credit to Puravankara Projects Ltd., noting that the goods must be...

Madras High Court Quashes Reassessment Based On Material Already Examined During Original Assessment

The Madras High Court has recently set aside reassessment proceedings initiated against an engineering equipment manufacturer after finding that the Income Tax Department reopened the assessment based on material that had already been disclosed and examined during the original assessment. Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy observed that the reassessment amounted to an impermissible change of opinion. "On comparing the above reasons for reopening with the reply of the petitioner to the notice...

Gujarat HC Holds Reassessment Notice Cannot Be Challenged After Assessment Order, Directs Appeal Remedy

The Gujarat High Court on 29 June held that a reassessment notice cannot be challenged through a writ petition after reassessment proceedings have culminated in an assessment order. A Division Bench comprising Justices A.S. Supehia and Vaibhavi D. Nanavati dismissed the writ petitions filed by Jitendra Shankarlal Mistri and others, holding that the petitioners could avail the statutory remedy of appeal against the reassessment orders before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The...

Tripura High Court Holds CGST Authorities Cannot Reopen Issues Already Taken Up By SGST, Quashes Order

The Tripura High Court on 30 June held that Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) authorities cannot initiate adjudication proceedings on issues that have already been taken up by State Goods and Services Tax (SGST) authorities on the same subject matter. A Division Bench of Chief Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao and Justice Biswajit Palit quashed a challenge to a demand cum show cause notice dated 22 July 2024 and an Order in Original dated 3 February 2025 issued under Section 74 of the Central...

Meghalaya HC Declines Writ Relief In ₹112 Crore BOT Annuity GST Case, Holds Appeal Is Proper Remedy

The Meghalaya High Court has held that disputes involving GST classification, interpretation of exemption notifications and taxability of transactions should ordinarily be decided through the statutory appellate mechanism under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and not through writ proceedings. A Division Bench of Justices H.S. Thangkhiew and B. Bhattacharjee dismissed a writ petition filed by Jorabat Shillong Expressway Limited, holding that the company had failed to establish any...

Volvo Not Liable To Pay Service Tax On Royalty Paid For Technical Know-How: CESTAT Bangalore

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in Bangalore has ruled that Volvo Buses (India) Pvt. Ltd. is not liable to pay service tax on royalty paid to its Swedish parent company for technical know-how under a Technical License Contract Agreement. The tribunal held that there was no material to show the royalty was paid towards any intellectual property right recognised under Indian law. A bench of Judicial Member P.A. Augustian and Technical Member R. Bhagya Devi...

Department Cannot Selectively Recalculate Service Tax On Works Contract Invoices: CESTAT Bengaluru

The Bengaluru Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 3 July held that the Department cannot selectively compute differential service tax on works contract services by accepting taxpayer's valuation methodology for some invoices while rejecting it for others. Judicial Member P. A. Augustian and Technical Member R. Bhagya Devi allowed two appeals and partly allowed another appeal filed by M.N. Associates challenging differential service tax demands raised by the...

Rent For Furniture In Commercial Lease Not Taxable As Deemed Sale: Telangana High Court

The Telangana High Court on 3 July held that rent received from leasing commercial buildings along with furniture, fixtures and other amenities cannot be taxed as a transfer of the right to use goods under the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 (APVAT Act) or the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (APGST Act), where the transaction is essentially one of renting immovable property and no exclusive right over the goods is transferred to the tenant. A Division Bench of Justices P....

Karnataka High Court Refuses To Quash DGGI Criminal Proceedings In Alleged Fake ITC Case

The Karnataka High Court has recently refused to quash criminal proceedings against a Mysuru scrap dealer accused of allegedly fraudulently availing and passing fake Input Tax Credit (ITC). It rejected his contention that the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) could not investigate the case because the State GST authorities had already initiated action. Justice M. Nagaprasanna relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Armour Security (India) Ltd. v. Commissioner, CGST, Delhi East...