Kerala High Court Sets Aside Rent Control Appellate Authority Order For Proceeding During IBC Moratorium

The Kerala High Court on Tuesday set aside an order of the Rent Control Appellate Authority after finding that an appeal against a corporate debtor had been taken up despite a moratorium being in force under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. A bench of Chief Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Syam Kumar V.M. observed, “Under Section 14(1), it is clearly stated that once a moratorium is declared, there cannot be an institution of suits or continuation of pending suits or proceedings against the...

Failure To Commence Arbitration Within 90 Days Does Not Vitiate Interim Proceedings: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on 23 February, observed that interim relief granted under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) does not automatically get vitiated merely because arbitral proceedings were not commenced within 90 days as required under Section 9(2) of the Act. Justice T.R. Ravi clarified that proceedings to enforce the interim relief would also constitute proceedings under Section 9, and therefore the 90-day calculation is not limited to the original interim...

Kerala High Court Holds ATM Fraud Losses Not Covered Under New India Assurance Policy, Dismisses Federal Bank Suit

The Kerala High Court has recently held that losses caused by fraudulent use of ATMs were excluded under the Banker's Indemnity Policy issued by New India Assurance Co. Ltd. to Federal Bank, setting aside a trial court decree that had directed the insurer to indemnify the bank.A Division Bench of Justice Sathish Ninan and Justice P. Krishna Kumar allowed the appeal filed by the insurance company and dismissed the bank's suit seeking indemnification under the policy. Federal Bank had filed a...

Arbitral Award Declared Unenforceable During Execution Proceedings Is Akin To Being Set Aside: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has recently held that when an arbitral award is declared unenforceable during execution proceedings, the legal effect is akin to the award being set aside, and fresh arbitral proceedings can be initiated only after issuing a fresh notice invoking arbitration under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Closing a batch of arbitration requests as premature, a single bench of Justice S. Manu said that once an award is declared a nullity by a competent...

Denial Of Input Tax Credit Limited To Depreciated Portion: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on 18 February clarified that Section 16(3) of the CGST Act bars input tax credit only on the part of a capital good's tax component where depreciation is claimed, not on the whole tax component. Justice Ziyad Rahman A A quashed the show-cause notices issued to banking companies that had denied input tax credit on the entire tax component solely because depreciation was claimed on the unavailed portion. The Bench observed: “as far as prohibition contemplated under...

Single Judicial Member Of NCLT Can Pass Orders If Authorised By President: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on 18 February, held that a Single Member of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) can pass orders if the President of the Tribunal specifically authorises them under the proviso to Section 419(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. A Bench of Justice Viju Abraham dismissed a writ petition challenging orders passed by a Single Judicial Member of the NCLT, Kochi Bench, upholding the validity of the directions. The Court observed: “It is also to be noted that though Section 419...

Single Judge Cannot Disregard Rulings Of Division Bench Under Guise Of Reference: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on Wednesday held that a Single Judge is bound by decisions of Division Benches and Full Benches and cannot question or disregard a binding Division Bench ruling under the guise of making a reference. A Division Bench of Chief Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Syam Kumar V.M was dealing with a reference arising from a writ petition filed by Grids Engineers and Contractors, challenging proceedings initiated by Union Bank of India under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The Bench...

Tax Evasion Prosecution Not Liable To Be Terminated If IT Penalty Set Aside On Technical Grounds: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has reiterated that criminal prosecutions for alleged tax evasion under the Income Tax Act do not automatically fail merely because penalty proceedings were set aside on technical grounds, and that such prosecutions can validly continue where allegations disclose wilful and deliberate concealment of income. The ruling was delivered by Justice G. Girish while dismissing a batch of criminal miscellaneous petitions filed by Dr. P.H. Abdul Majeed, who had sought the quashing...

Taxpayer Cannot Escape Prosecution By Filing Revised Returns Post-Search: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on 20 February held that filing revised income tax returns after a search and seizure operation does not absolve a taxpayer from criminal prosecution for wilful tax evasion, and that such revised returns cannot be used as a shield against offences punishable under the Income Tax Act, 1961. Justice G. Girish, dismissed a batch of petitions filed by a medical practitioner challenging prosecutions pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Economic Offences),...

Bank Cannot Cancel Confirmed Auction Sale Due To Pending DRT Proceedings: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on 3 March held that a bank cannot unilaterally set aside a confirmed auction sale merely because proceedings challenging the sale are pending before the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT). A Division Bench of Justice Anil K Narendran and Justice Muralee Krishna S was considering an appeal filed by the legal heirs of Vinod M.A., an auction purchaser. The Court stated: “It is trite that the authorised officer of the Bank cannot set aside the sale which was already confirmed in...

Conciliation Under MSMED Act Is Mandatory, Cannot Be Waived By Parties: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on 27 February held that the statutory mandate of conciliation under Section 18(2) of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 cannot be waived by a party to proceedings before the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council. A Division Bench of Justice Anil K Narendran and Justice Muralee Krishna S allowed a writ appeal filed by Malabar Social Service and Sanitation (MASSS) and set aside the judgment of the Single Judge which had quashed an award...

Limited SARFAESI Auction Deferment To Preserve Subject Matter Within Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on Monday upheld a Single Judge's two-week deferment of a SARFAESI auction, holding that the limited relief granted to preserve the subject matter did not exceed supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution. A division bench of Justice Anil K Narendran and Justice Muralee Krishna S dismissed a writ appeal filed by Union Bank of India, observing that the single judge had not entered into the merits of the dispute. S.S. Glass World had approached the...