SERVICE TAX
Fortis Not Liable To Pay ₹50 Lakh Service Tax On Facilities Provided To Visiting Doctors: CESTAT Chandigarh
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has recently held that Fortis Healthcare is not liable to pay service tax on infrastructure and administrative facilities provided to visiting doctors. A coram of Judicial Member S.S. Garg and Technical Member P. Anjani Kumar said the arrangement was part of delivering medical treatment and not a separate taxable service. Allowing the appeal, the tribunal held that such services “do not fall under the category of...
CESTAT Chennai Allows Nissan Group SEZ Unit's Claim For Refund Of Service Tax Paid
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at Chennai has ruled in favour of Renault Nissan Technology and Business Centre India, holding that service tax refund claims of Special Economic Zone units cannot be rejected only because they were filed late. A coram of Judicial Member P. Dinesha and Technical Member Vasa Seshagiri Rao said the six-month time limit in Notification No. 9/2009 Service Tax is procedural. It cannot defeat the statutory exemption under the SEZ law. ...
Mid-Day Meal Scheme: CESTAT Grants Service Tax Relief To Government Catering Institute
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has granted relief to a government-run catering institute that supplies Mid-Day meals to the UT education department. It reiterated that the preparation and supply of cooked food under the Mid-Day Meal Scheme does not amount to 'outdoor catering' and is therefore not liable to service tax.The coram, consisting of Judicial Member SS Garg and Technical Member P Anjani Kumar stated that the...
Differential GST On Pre-GST Works Contracts To Be Reimbursed By State Agencies: Karnataka High Court
The Karnataka High Court ruled that the additional GST liability arising out of the shift from the pre-GST VAT (Value Added Tax) regime to the GST regime in ongoing works contracts cannot be imposed on contractors.The bench consists of Justice M Nagaprasanna, who directed the State Departments and government agencies to reimburse the differential GST to contractors.All the contracts were awarded prior to July 2017 under the KVAT regime, where the contract rates factored in VAT and...
Gauhati High Court Rejects Bail Plea In ₹8.59 Crore GST Fraud Case
The Gauhati High Court has recently denied bail to a petitioner in Rs. 8.59-crore fake Input Tax Credit (ITC) scam, observing that the allegations disclose an organized and well-planned fraud involving misuse of the GST system. A bench comprising Justice Pranjal Das noted that custodial interrogation was necessary as the investigation was at a crucial stage and that granting bail could hamper efforts to unearth the larger conspiracy. Bahadur Islam, the petitioner, was arrested for alleged...
Procuring Authority Liable For Differential GST In Government Contracts: Madras High Court Reiterates
Reiterating that additional GST arising from the rollout of the GST regime in government works contracts must be borne by the procuring authority, the Madras High Court has directed the Tamil Nadu Housing Board to consider a contractor's claim for reimbursement of differential tax.A Bench of Justice N Sathish Kumar relying on settled law, held that contractors cannot be fastened with liability for differential GST, interest, or penalties when tax was discharged strictly in accordance...
Kerala General Sales Tax Act | Once Limitation Lapses, Assessment Cannot Be Revived: Kerala High Court
The Kerala High Court has held that assessment proceedings initiated beyond the statutory limitation period under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (KGST Act), are unsustainable in law and liable to be set aside. Justice Harisankar V. Menon noted that the pre-assessment notice under Section 17(3) of the KGST Act was issued against Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. for the assessment year 2007–08 only on August 25, 2017. The assessment order was passed later, on January 28, 2019. This was...
GST Notices And Orders Issued Only In Summary Forms Without Details Are Unsustainable: Calcutta High Court
The Calcutta High Court has quashed a GST adjudication order passed solely through summary online forms, holding that tax liability cannot be imposed without clearly setting out the allegations and reasons as required under law. A single-judge bench of Justice Om Narayan Rai said the manner in which the proceedings were conducted could not be sustained. “The order that has been passed and communicated to the petitioner has remained in summary form. It is bereft of any detail and sans any...
Mere Stock Shortage Not Proof Of Clandestine Removal: CESTAT Allahabad
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at Allahabad has held that a shortage of goods found during a departmental inspection cannot, by itself, justify allegations of clandestine removal. The final outcome came after a split verdict was resolved by a third member, S.S. Garg, who agreed that stock shortages alone cannot be treated as proof of illegal clearances. Garg underlined that “mere shortage of goods does not lead to the conclusion that the goods have been removed...
Crop Compensation Paid To Farmers For Transmission Lines Passing Their Land Not Taxable: CESTAT Ahmedabad
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that crop compensation charges paid to farmers for laying electricity transmission lines are not liable to service tax. A coram of Judicial Member Ajaya Krishna Vishvesha and Technical Member Satendra Vikram Singh said these payments are compensatory in nature and not consideration for any service. The tribunal held that developing and maintaining a transmission network is a statutory duty of a...
GST Authorities Cannot Pass Orders Against Deceased Taxpayer, Recover From Heirs: Allahabad High Court
The Allahabad High Court has held that while GST law allows proceedings to be pursued against a legal heir after the death of a taxpayer, authorities cannot determine tax liability in the name of a deceased person and then recover it from the heir. The court ruled that Section 93 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, permits recovery from legal representatives only after a valid determination against them, and not through orders passed against a dead assessee. A bench of Justice Shekhar B...
GSTAT Seeks Proof Of Applicable Pre-GST Service Tax Rate In LIC HFL Care Homes Case
The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) at Delhi has narrowed a profiteering dispute involving LIC HFL Care Homes Limited to a single question: what rate of service tax was applicable in the pre-GST regime, and how much tax was actually paid?A division bench of President Justice (Retd.) Dr. Sanjaya Kumar Mishra and Technical Member A. Venu Prasad, while hearing an appeal by the Director General of Anti-Profiteering, said the disagreement between the parties now centres on the...