SERVICE TAX
Earth Excavation For Govt Dam Project Is Works Contract, Eligible For Service Tax Exemption: CESTAT Hyderabad
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad has held that earth excavation and site formation work carried out by a sub-contractor for a government dam project qualified as a works contract service, even though the sub-contractor had not actually paid VAT.The Division Bench of Judicial Member Angad Prasad and Technical Member A.K. Jyotishi held that Capital Housing Projects Pvt. Ltd. was entitled to exemption from service tax under Serial No. 29(h) of Notification...
Foreign University Agent Not 'Intermediary' Without Tripartite Arrangement: CESTAT Chandigarh
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 18 August held that an overseas education consultant cannot be treated as an “intermediary” merely because it acts as an agent of foreign universities and receives commission from them. A Bench comprising Judicial Member S.S. Garg and Technical Member P. Anjani Kumar, dismissed the Revenue's appeal against Trivedi Overseas Education Services, holding that where there is no tripartite arrangement and only...
DBS Bank Indian Branch's ECB Services To Singapore Office Not 'Intermediary Services': CESTAT Mumbai
On 17 August, the Mumbai Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that services provided by DBS Bank's Indian branch to its Singapore head office in connection with External Commercial Borrowings (ECB) cannot be treated as “intermediary services” for levy of service tax. A Bench comprising Judicial Member S.K. Mohanty and Technical Member M.M. Parthiban held that the Indian branch and DBS Bank Singapore were not two different persons but formed part of the same legal...
Mumbai CESTAT Holds Tata Communications' Transponder Bandwidth Services Are Telecommunication Services
The Mumbai Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 17 August held that transponder bandwidth services received by Tata Communications Limited from foreign satellite service providers constitute telecommunication services and cannot be classified as Business Support Services (BSS). A Bench comprising Judicial Member S.K. Mohanty and Technical Member M.M. Parthiban dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the Commissioner's order dropping service tax demands against the...
CESTAT Mumbai Says No Separate Tax On Interchange Fee If Tax Paid On Entire MDR, Grants HDFC Bank Relief
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held on 17 August that service tax cannot be separately demanded on the interchange fee earned by a credit card issuing bank when the bank has already paid service tax on the entire Merchant Discount Rate (MDR). A Bench comprising Judicial Member S.K. Mohanty and Technical Member M.M. Parthiban set aside the service tax demands raised against HDFC Bank Ltd., along with interest and penalties, relying on the...
Supreme Court Upholds TVS Motor's Referral Charges As Business Auxiliary Service, Sets Aside Penalty
The Supreme Court on 19 August held that TVS Motor Company Limited was liable to pay service tax on referral charges it received from banks and an insurance company for facilitating vehicle loans and insurance policies, treating the charges as Business Auxiliary Service under the Finance Act, 1994. However, the Division Bench comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K. Vinod Chandran set aside the penalty imposed on the company under Section 78 of the Finance Act, after finding that it had paid...
CESTAT Taxability Appeals Lie Before Supreme Court U/S 35L Of Central Excise Act: Telangana High Court
The Telangana High Court has held that an appeal against a Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) order involving the taxability or classification of a service lies before the Supreme Court under Section 35L of the Central Excise Act, and not before the High Court under Section 35G. A Division Bench comprising Justices P. Sam Koshy and Narsing Rao Nandikonda dismissed an appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Central Tax & Customs against Mars International...
Transitioned CENVAT Credit Valid For Service Tax Appeal Pre-Deposit: Karnataka High Court
The Karnataka High Court on 4 August held that CENVAT credit transitioned to the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime can be used to meet the mandatory pre-deposit requirement for a service tax appeal. A Division Bench of Justices S.G. Pandit and K. Manmadha Rao set aside the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) order rejecting a pre-deposit of Rs.79,77,301 made by debiting the Electronic Credit Ledger through Form GSTR-3B. The judges held: "The mandatory pre-deposit...
Aircraft 'Dry Lease' Taxable Where Lessor Retains Possession, Effective Control: CESTAT Chennai
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that merely calling an aircraft arrangement a “lease” does not mean that possession and effective control have been transferred to the other party. The tribunal found that Orient Flight School retained effective control and legal possession of the aircraft, and upheld the service tax levy on the arrangement as “Supply of Tangible Goods Service.""Though the agreement uses terms like “lease” and “lessee”,...
Discharge Certificate Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme Bars Appeal On Settled Tax Dispute: CESTAT Hyderabad
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad has held that the Revenue cannot continue an appeal concerning a tax dispute after the assessee has settled it under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 and received a discharge certificate covering the same matter and period.“Once the statutory authorities themselves accept the declaration and issue discharge certificate, the dispute reaches finality. Neither the assessee nor the Department can...
Later Statutory 10% Pre-Deposit For Appeal Cannot Cure Earlier 50% Pre-Deposit Default: CESTAT Hyderabad
The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad, has held that a later statutory requirement of a 10% pre-deposit could not cure an earlier failure to comply with a 50% deposit condition imposed for pursuing an appeal.The amended Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, introduced a mandatory 10% pre-deposit from August 6, 2014. Since the appeal had already been dismissed on July 23, 2014 for failure to comply with the 50% condition, the later provision could not...
Service Tax Demand Cannot Go Beyond Show-Cause Notice: CESTAT Delhi
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Delhi, has reiterated that adjudicating and appellate authorities cannot confirm a service tax demand under a category different from the one specified in the show-cause notice. The assessee must be put on notice about the category of taxable service under which the demand is proposed.The bench comprised Judicial Member Dr. Rachna Gupta and Technical Member P.V. Subba Rao.The tribunal, relying on earlier decisions, observed,“Once...