NCLAT New Delhi Dismisses Korea Trade Insurance Corp's Insolvency Plea Against Amrit Polychmen

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) and Barun Mitra (Member-Technical), has dismissed the Korea Trade Insurance Corporation (Ksure) plea for insolvency of Amrit Polychmen, saying that the Ksure was well aware of the pre-existing dispute before stepping into the shoes of JTC. Amrit Polychem Pvt. Ltd. (APL) placed three purchase orders with JT Corporation (JTC), Korea, for purchasing some...

NCLT Can Direct Legal Heirs & Power Of Attorney Holders To Execute Sale Deeds To Perfect Title Of Corporate Debtor's Asset: NCLAT

The NCLAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) and Barun Mitra (Member-Technical), has held that the adjudicating authority can direct the legal heirs and the power of attorney holders to execute the sale deeds to perfect the title of the corporate debtor's asset under section 60(5) of the IBC, 2016. The appeal was filed against the order passed by the NCLT Chandigarh. The adjudicating authority ordered the legal heirs and the person holding the...

IIHL Tells NCLAT It Has RBI Nod For Name Change, Seeks 8 Weeks To Drop 'Reliance' Brand

IndusInd International Holdings Ltd (IIHL), the successful resolution applicant for Reliance Capital, informed the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) on Friday that it has received approval from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to change the company's name and expects the rebranding process to be completed within eight weeks.The submission came amid an ongoing trademark dispute with Anil Ambani's Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Ventures Pvt Ltd (ADAVL), which claims ownership of the 'Reliance'...

NCLAT Cannot Record Settlement After Admission Of CIRP By NCLT: NCLAT New Delhi

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, comprising Justice N. Seshasayee (Member-Judicial) and Arun Baroka (Member-Technical), has refused to record the settlement between the parties and remanded the matter back to the adjudicating authority. The appeal was filed challenging the adjudicating authority's order, which was passed without hearing the appellant. By the impugned order, the NCLT admitted the respondent into the CIRP. The appellant...

NBFC's Non-Compliance With RBI Directions Cannot Defeat Classification Of Loan As Financial Debt: NCLAT New Delhi

The NCLAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) and Barun Mitra (Member-Technical), has held that the non-compliance with the RBI guidelines by an NBFC cannot defeat the classification of a loan as a financial debt u/s 7 of the IBC. Brief Background The appeal was filed challenging the impugned order passed by the NCLT Kolkata. In the impugned order, the adjudicating authority observed that the appellant failed to establish the nature of the...

Reverse CIRP Can't Be Claimed As Right: NCLAT Upholds Insolvency Against Supertech Realtors

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi upheld an admission order under section of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) against Supertech Realtors Pvt. Ltd. and dismissed an appeal filed by Ram Kishore Arora, its suspended director. A bench comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Barun Mitra (Technical Member) observed that once debt and default are established, the adjudicating authority is bound to admit the application and cannot compel the lenders to...

ED Cannot Retain Attached Assets After Approval of Resolution Plan : NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal on Tuesday held that any attachment of assets by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) ceases to have effect once a resolution plan is approved under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).A coram of Chairperson Justice Ashok Bhushan, along with Technical Member Barun Mitra observed that the section 32A of the Code extinguishing all prior criminal liabilities of the Corporate Debtor will come into force...

Bank Cannot Retain One Company's Fixed Deposit For Group Company's Loan: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) at Delhi has recently held that a bank cannot retain a fixed deposit belonging to one company to recover dues from another, even if they are part of the same group.The case involved Reliance Communication Infrastructure Limited (RCIL), which had placed a fixed deposit of Rs. 27.60 crore with the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC). The bank refused to release the funds during RCIL's insolvency, claiming a lien over the FD to recover...

KMC Is Secured Creditor U/S 232 Of Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act: NCLAT New Delhi

The NCLAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) and Barun Mitra (Member-Technical), has held that the Kolkata Municipal Corporation is a secured creditor by virtue of section 232 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980. Background of the Case An asset of the corporate debtor was assessed for property tax by the Kolkata Municipal Corporation. However, part of the payment was due, which led to the issuance of the warrant of distress....

Salman Khan Withdraws ₹7.24 Crore Insolvency Plea Against Jerai Fitness After Settlement

Actor Salman Khan has withdrawn his ₹7.24 crore insolvency petition against Jerai Fitness Limited after both parties reached a settlement.On Wednesday, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) recorded the consent terms and allowed the withdrawal. The bench comprised Chairperson Justice Ashok Bhushan and Technical Member Arun Baroka.The dispute related to unpaid dues under a 2018 trade licence agreement, under which Jerai Fitness was granted rights to use the “BEING STRONG” trademark...

Time Spent In DRT Recovery Proceedings Cannot Be Excluded U/S 14 Of Limitation Act: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that the benefit of section 14 of the Limitation Act cannot be extended to the creditor who had initiated recovery proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) under the Recovery of Debt and Bankruptcy Act, 1993. The Tribunal held that the benefit under section 14 of the Act can be given only when the forum before which the proceedings were initiated lacked jurisdiction or suffered from a defect of similar nature. A bench...

No Concept Of “Symbolic Possession” Under IBC, IRP Is Entitled To Take Actual Control Of Corporate Debtor's Assets: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) Chennai bench of Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma (Judicial Member) and Jatindranath Swain (Technical Member) has dismissed an appeal filed by two promoters of M/s Orion Water Treatment Private Limited holding that there is no concept of symbolic possession under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) once Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) is initiated under section 10 of the IBC. The Tribunal further held that the ...