Delhi High Court Quashes Customs Demand Against JAL After Unfiled Insolvency Claim Stood Extinguished

The Delhi High Court has held that a pre-insolvency customs claim against Jaiprakash Associates Limited stood extinguished after the Customs Department failed to submit it during the company's insolvency process and the resolution plan was approved.The Division Bench of Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Shail Jain observed, “The failure of the Respondents (Customs) to submit their claim cannot…operate to the prejudice of the Corporate Debtor or the Successful Resolution Applicant. The IBC does not...

India-ASEAN Trade Agreement's Dispute Resolution Mechanism Can't Bar Customs Action: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that the dispute resolution mechanism under the India-ASEAN trade agreement cannot bar Customs authorities from initiating proceedings under the Customs Act 1962, observing that the relevant treaty provision has not been incorporated into Indian domestic law.The Division Bench of Justices Anil Khetarpal and Shail Jain made the observation while dismissing a petition filed by M.M. Ceramics & Ferro Alloys challenging Customs proceedings relating to its claim of...

Lack Of Written Customs SCN Doesn't Warrant Release Of Detained Goods Where Oral Proceedings Were Held: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that the absence of a separate written show cause notice does not, by itself, justify the release of goods detained by Customs. This is particularly so where the Department asserts that oral proceedings were undertaken at the time of interception and remains willing to afford the passenger a personal hearingThe Division Bench of Justices Anil Khetarpal and Shail Jain made the observation while dismissing a petition seeking release of two gold bars weighing 166...

Mere Natural Justice Violation Claim Cannot Bypass Customs Appeal Remedy: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has recently held that a mere assertion of violation of principles of natural justice cannot, by itself, justify bypassing the statutory appellate remedy under the Customs Act, 1962.The Division Bench of Justices Anil Khetarpal and Shail Jain made the observation while declining to entertain a writ petition challenging the absolute confiscation of a 117-gram gold bar by Customs authorities.Petitioner contended that no valid Show Cause Notice was issued before confiscation...

'Remained Inactive For Several Years': Delhi High Court Refuses To Entertain Writ Against Customs Gold Seizure

The Delhi High Court has refused to entertain a writ petition challenging the confiscation of a 116-gram gold bar seized by Customs in December 2020, noting that the petitioner remained “inactive for several years” and approached the Court only in 2025.The Division Bench of Justices Anil Khetarpal and Shail Jain observed that Petitioner was aware of the seizure but did not take any steps in respect of it for several years. The Court also noted that the confiscation order passed by Customs in...

Delhi High Court Finds No Natural Justice Violation In Customs Case After Four Missed Hearings

The Delhi High Court has recently dismissed a plea challenging a Customs order on the ground that Petitioners were denied a personal hearing, holding that they had been given repeated and adequate opportunities, which they failed to avail.The Division Bench of Justices Anil Khetarpal and Shail Jain observed that adjournments were granted as an indulgence rather than as a right, and that Petitioners were afforded four opportunities of personal hearing between September and December 2024.The case...

Delhi High Court Says Advance Service Mandatory For Fair Hearing In Second Plea Over Nagpur Logistics Park

The Delhi High Court on 1 September dismissed a second petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by DC Multi Modal Park Pvt. Ltd., after noting that the company had obtained a status quo order without advance-serving the successful bidder, even though it had the bidder's complete contact details.Justice Tushar Rao Gedela held that advance service in proceedings seeking interim relief is essential to ensure that parties who may be affected by an order get...

Customs Broker Has Right To Cross-Examine Witnesses In Licence Revocation Inquiry: Delhi High Court

On 1 September, the Delhi High Court held that a Customs Broker is entitled to cross-examine witnesses whose statements are relied upon in proceedings for revocation of its licence under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 (CBLR). A Division Bench of Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Shail Jain upheld the remand of the revocation proceedings for fresh adjudication after granting Vogue Logistics Pvt. Ltd. an opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses. It observed: “Regulation 17(3) of...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Patson Foods From Using Ching's Secret's 'Schezwan Chutney' Mark

The Delhi High Court on 25 August temporarily restrained Patson Foods (India) Private Limited from selling or marketing its “Rasanand Schezwan Chutney” product, after noting that the company had gone back on its written undertaking to stop using Capital Foods Private Limited's registered trademark “Schezwan Chutney”. Justice Jyoti Singh held that Capital Foods, the company behind the Ching's Secret brand, had established a prima facie case of trademark infringement and passing off. The Bench...

Delhi High Court Restrains YouTube Loan Settlement Channels From Using IDFC First Bank's Marks

The Delhi High Court on 24 August restrained individuals and entities operating YouTube channels including “Settlement Guru”, “AHK Tips”, “Expert Loan Settlement Advice”, “Kunal Kumar Tutorial” and “Loan Wala Bishu” from using IDFC First Bank's registered trademarks and fabricated settlement letters bearing the Bank's logo. Justice Jyoti Singh was hearing an application filed by IDFC First Bank seeking an interim injunction against the operators of these channels. The Bench held: “Prima facie,...

Trial Courts Can't Demand Unrelated Police Statistics While Examining Charge-Sheet: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that while a Magistrate can direct further investigation if dissatisfied with a police report, a trial court cannot seek statistical information that has no bearing on the investigation in the case before it. Justice Manoj Jain made the observation while dealing with three petitions filed by Station House Officers (SHOs) challenging directions issued by the trial court in three cases registered under the Delhi Excise Act, 2009 following the recovery of illicit...

Delhi High Court Refuses Writ Pleas Against GST Order Covering 629 Firms In Fake Invoice Case

The Delhi High Court on 21 August declined to entertain petitions challenging an adjudication order passed against 629 firms and individuals in connection with an alleged large-scale fake invoice racket, holding that disputed factual issues concerning their individual roles should be examined by the statutory Appellate Authority. A Division Bench of Justices Anil Khetarpal and Shail Jain relegated the petitioners to the statutory remedy of appeal, holding that whether their replies to the Show...