Can Personality Rights Be Protected After Death? Meta Raises Query In Delhi HC Over Sadgurudev Babji's Personality Rights

Meta, on Tuesday, questioned before the Delhi High Court whether personality rights can be asserted for a deceased person, during the hearing of a suit by the Shree Swaminarayan Sarvopari Siddhant Digvijay Trust against a breakaway faction allegedly using the likeness and personality of its founder, Sadguru Shri Devnandandasji Swami, popularly known as Babji. During the hearing before Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, counsel for Meta, while addressing the reliefs sought against intermediary...

Delhi High Court Denies Interim Relief To Buyer As Developer's Claims Fail In Arbitration

The Delhi High Court has refused interim protection to a purchaser seeking to restrain the creation of third-party rights and maintain status quo over the first floor of a Greater Kailash-I property, holding that the claim could not survive once the developer's claimed authority to create such rights stood rejected in arbitrationJustice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar held that the buyer's claim was entirely derivative of the Collaboration Agreement executed between developer Aditya Bhutani and the...

Delhi High Court Directs SpiceJet To Disclose Assets In Sunbird France Plea To Enforce ₹84 Crore Foreign Decree

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday directed SpiceJet Ltd to file an affidavit disclosing its assets within three weeks in proceedings initiated by France-based aircraft lessor Sunbird France 02 SAS. Sunbird is seeking enforcement of a foreign decree of around ₹84 crore passed by the England & Wales Commercial Court against the airline. Justice Vikas Mahajan recorded the consent of the parties. He directed that, without prejudice to their rights and contentions, SpiceJet shall file the...

Urban Company Agrees Before Delhi High Court To Edit One Of Ads Allegedly Disparaging Kent RO Products

Urban Company (UC), maker of the Native RO water purifier, agreed before the Delhi High Court on Tuesday to edit one of three advertisements that Kent RO Systems alleged were disparaging its products, without agreeing to take it down entirely.The matter was heard by Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, with Senior Advocate Amit Sibal appearing for Urban Company and counsel for Kent RO walking the court through the three advertisements frame by frame. The Court, however, did not pass any takedown...

Delhi High Court Refuses Interim Relief To Commercial Space Licensee Against Delhi Metro Rail Corporation

The Delhi High Court has refused interim relief to QC One Solutions Pvt. Ltd. against Delhi Metro Rail Corporation's termination of a licence agreement for commercial spaces at three metro stations. The court prima facie found that the company had repeatedly defaulted on payment of licence fees and electricity dues despite multiple opportunities to cure the breaches. Justice Vikas Mahajan, in an order passed on May 20, held that QC One Solutions had failed to establish a prima facie case for...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Rejection Of Patent For VIB's Oral Protein Delivery Invention

The Delhi High Court has set aside the Controller of Patents' refusal of a patent application filed by VIB VZW, a Belgium-based life sciences research institute for an invention relating to oral delivery of therapeutic proteins, holding that the patent authority failed to consider the applicant's submissions and passed an unreasoned order.Justice Jyoti Singh held that the failure to engage with the applicant's detailed response defeated the patent examination process itself. “Not according...

Delhi High Court Dismisses Ilaiyaraaja's Review Plea In 'En Iniya Pon Nilave' Copyright Dispute

The Delhi High Court has dismissed composer Ilaiyaraaja's review petition against its May 21, 2026 judgment that upheld Saregama India Ltd.'s copyright claim over the sound recording of the iconic song En Iniya Pon Nilave from the Tamil film Moodu Pani, holding that no ground for review was made out.A Division Bench of Justice C. Hari Shankar and Justice Om Prakash Shukla rejected the plea after hearing Senior Advocate Swathi Sukumar for Ilaiyaraaja. The dispute began after Saregama sued Vels...

Delhi High Court Protects IndiGo From Coercive Action In ₹458 Crore GST Dispute

The Delhi High Court on Friday protected InterGlobe Aviation, which operates India's largest airline IndiGo, from coercive action over a ₹458.26 crore goods and services tax (GST) demand linked to compensation received from a foreign engine supplier. A division bench of Justices Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Ajay Digpaul issued notice to the GST department and granted interim protection to the airline after observing that, prima facie, the amount received by IndiGo appeared to be “compensation”, and...

Extension Without Liquidated Damages Does Not Bar Damages Or Bank Guarantee Invocation: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court on 25 May held that extension of time without levy of liquidated damages does not, by itself, prevent a party from later invoking contractual remedies, including liquidated damages and enforcement of an unconditional bank guarantee, where disputes relating to delay and termination require arbitral adjudication. A Bench of Justice Mini Pushkarna declined relief to Kalpataru Projects International Limited and refused to grant interim protection under Section 9 of the...

Delhi HC Sets Aside ₹55 Lakh Arbitral Award To Budhiraja Electricals, Rejects Clause 10CC-Based Damages

The Delhi High Court on 22 May set aside arbitral awards granting Rs. 38.96 lakh towards escalation and Rs. 16.23 lakh towards loss of profits to Budhiraja Electricals in its dispute with the Public Works Department, Government of NCT of Delhi. Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar held that an arbitral tribunal cannot use Clause 10CC of the General Conditions of Contract as a substitute for proof of actual loss once it finds the clause inapplicable to the extended period, and reiterated that...

High Courts' Supervisory Jurisdiction In Arbitration Falls Within 'Razor-Thin Compass': Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that its power to interfere in arbitral proceedings is confined to a “razor-thin compass,” refusing to interfere with an arbitral tribunal's rejection of Sunil Walia's jurisdictional objections in a partnership dispute involving Jason Enterprises. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav observed that judicial intervention in arbitral matters must remain exceptional. “At the outset, it may be observed that there is no absolute bar on the exercise of jurisdiction under...

Delhi HC Upholds DGCEI Officers' Discharge In Custodial Torture Case, Rejects CCTV Evidence

On 22 May, the Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of officers of the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence (DGCEI) who were accused of illegally detaining, kidnapping and torturing a businessman during a central excise investigation. A Bench of Justice Amit Mahajan held that the CCTV footage relied upon by the complainant was not admissible because it did not have the required certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and dismissed the revision petitions...