Calcutta High Court Refers Reliance Entities' Telecom Tower Lease Dispute To Arbitration, Leaves Objections Open

The Calcutta High Court has referred a telecom tower lease dispute to arbitration. It declined to decide, at the referral stage, whether non-signatory Reliance group entities were bound by the arbitration clause or whether past dues stood extinguished under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). Justice Shampa Sarkar held that such objections raise triable jurisdictional issues. These must be decided by the arbitral tribunal. The court reiterated that its role under Section 11 of the...

Executing Court Cannot Impose Onerous Conditions For Release Of Arbitral Award Without Stay: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has set aside a condition imposed by an executing court that required an award-holder to furnish a bank guarantee to obtain release of an arbitral award amount. The court held that no such condition can be imposed by the executing court in the absence of any interim stay. A bench of Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri held that once objections to an arbitral award are dismissed and no interim order is granted in appeal, the executing court is bound to execute the...

Delhi High Court Injuncts 23 Rogue Websites Illegaly Streaming UEFA Champions League 2025–26

Holding that piracy of live sports poses a “recurring threat” and that any delay would cause irreparable copyright breach and revenue loss, the Delhi High Court on February 5 granted an ex parte ad interim injunction blocking 23 rogue websites from unauthorisedly streaming matches of the ongoing UEFA Champions League 2025–26. Justice Jyoti Singh observed that the Champions League season is currently underway and will conclude only in May 2026. Any delay in blocking access to infringing...

No Appeal Lies Against Conditional Stay Of Arbitral Award: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court has recently held that an appeal does not lie against an order granting conditional stay of an arbitral award, observing that such orders fall outside the narrow appellate framework prescribed under arbitration Act. Section 36(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, allows a party that has challenged an arbitral award in court to seek a stay on the enforcement of that award. A Division Bench of Justice Debangsu Basak and Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi dismissed...

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Composite GST Notice Against ICAD School

The Bombay High Court on Friday set aside a composite show cause notice spanning five financial years, issued to ICAD School of Learning Private Limited, a JEE and NEET coaching centre that offers hostel and mess facilities.On 6 February 2026, a Bench of Justice Anil L. Pansare and Justice Nivedita P. Mehta emphasised that consolidation defeats the statutory scheme of assessment and recovery for distinct financial years.Taking note of the GST framework, which mandates filing of returns with...

Recovery Impact Not Valid Ground To Oppose Transfer Of Winding-Up Proceedings To NCLT: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has recently observed that objections raised by secured creditors and the Official Liquidator to the transfer of winding-up proceedings from the High Court to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) cannot be sustained merely because such a transfer may affect their recovery actions. Justice Arif S. Doctor made the observation while allowing a company application filed by Sahjun Impex Trading Pvt. Ltd. The application sought transfer of a pending winding-up petition...

Limitation To Challenge Arbitral Award Starts On Postal Delivery To Party Not Email To Lawyer: Patna High Court

The Patna High Court has recently ruled that the limitation period to challenge an arbitral award starts only when the party itself receives a signed copy of the award by registered post, and not when a signed copy is merely received on the email of the party's lawyer. "Thus, a conjoint reading of sub-section (5) of Section 31 and sub-section (3) of Section 34 would make it clear that the reckoning point for computation of the period of limitation is the date on which the party making the...

Delhi High Court Protects 60-Year-Old Trademark Rights, Orders Removal of 'ARUN' From 'AiC ARUN' Mark

The Delhi High Court on Monday ordered the removal of the word “ARUN” from Alka Industrial Corporation's registered trademark “AiC ARUN,” holding that the mark infringed the six-decade-old “ARUN” brand of Satya Paul & Company used for sewing machines. Allowing a rectification petition filed by Satya Paul & Company, Justice Tushar Rao Gedela held that the firm had continuously and uninterruptedly used the trade name “ARUN” since 1962 and had established substantial goodwill and...

Income Tax | Mere Disagreement On Facts With Assessing Officer No Ground to Invoke Writ Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has reiterated that its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution cannot be invoked merely because a taxpayer disputes the correctness of facts or the material relied upon by the Assessing Officer in reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, 1961.A division bench of Justices Dinesh Mehta and Vinod Kumar observed,“A challenge to notice or proceedings can be considered normally, in case where the notice and proceedings are without jurisdiction. Simply...

Income Tax Act | Loan Repayment Within Two-Day Of Receipt Alone Doesn't Prove Bogus Transaction: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has recently held that mere repayment of a loan within a short span of time, even within two days, does not by itself establish that the transaction was a sham or a bogus accommodation entry for the purposes of Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.A division bench of Justices Dinesh Mehta and Vinod Kumar observed,“Simply because the loan has been paid within two days, it cannot be said with certitude that the loan was not a genuine loan and was only a paper entry....

Bombay High Court Directs Mumbai Stamps Collector To Expedite Decision On Developer's Representation

The Bombay High Court has directed the Additional Collector of Stamps, Mumbai, to expeditiously decide a representation filed in 2022 by a Mumbai-based developer seeking reconsideration of the Ready Reckoner rates applicable to its residential project. A Division Bench of Justice M. S. Karnik and Justice S. M. Modak granted the Additional Collector twelve weeks from the date of communication of the order to hear the developer and decide the representation on merits. The Court also directed the...

S.148 Income Tax Act | Assessing Officer Not Required To Share Entire Record At Reassessment Notice Stage: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that an Assessing Officer is not required to supply the entire material on record to an assessee at the stage of issuing a notice under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act ,1961 (re-assessment stage) observing that such a requirement would unnecessarily protract reassessment proceedings and enable assessees to manufacture defences.A division bench of Justices Dinesh Mehta and Vinod Kumar observed,“If it is held that every material has to be supplied to the assessee...