CESTAT Cannot Reject Taxpayer Appeals Below ₹2 Lakh On Monetary Limit Alone: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court recently held that the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal cannot mechanically reject a taxpayer's appeal on the ground that the amount involved is below ₹2 lakh. The Court said such appeals are maintainable as a rule and may be refused only in exceptional cases.The ruling was delivered by a Division Bench of Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Justice Indrajeet Shukla. Explaining the law, the bench said, "Thus, while appeals filed by the revenue, below the...

MSME Revival Benefits Depend On Loan Limit, Not Outstanding Dues: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court recently held that eligibility for benefits under the Reserve Bank of India's framework for revival and rehabilitation of MSMEs depends on the sanctioned loan limit and not on the outstanding amount. The court, thus, cleared the way for Union Bank of India to continue insolvency proceedings against Vardhan Agro Processing Limited. A Division Bench of Justice Manish Pitale and Justice Shreeram V. Shirsat heard the case. While explaining the scope of the RBI framework, the...

Arbitration Cases Weekly Digest [26th January - 1st February, 2026]

Nominal Index Jan De Nul Dredging India Pvt. Ltd. v. Tuticorin Port Trust, 2026 LLBiz SC 15Jagdeep Chowgule v. Sheela Chowgule and Ors, 2026 LLBiz SC 30 M/s Angel One Limited v. S.X.J. Vasan, 2026 LLBiz HC (MAD) 30M/s Ramacivil India Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Central Public Works Department, 2026 LLBiz HC (DEL) 77Arun Mehrotra Versus Kishan Lal, 2026 LLBiz HC (DEL) 85 To ReaVedanta Limited v. Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation Ltd., 2026 LLBiz HC (DEL) 88IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance...

Commercial Courts Act | Institution Of Suit Means Presentation, Not Registration, For Mandatory Mediation: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has held that the requirement of pre-institution mediation under Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act does not apply where a suit was instituted before the provision was declared mandatory, even if the suit was registered after that date. The court clarified that, for the purposes of Section 12-A, a suit is instituted when the plaint is presented before the court and not when it is subsequently registered by the registry. A Single Judge Bench of Justice Gauri...

Delhi High Court Grants Interim Trademark Protection To PhysicsWallah, Orders Takedown Of Disparaging Posts

The Delhi High Court has granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favour of PhysicsWallah Limited, restraining former employee and rival coaching operator Nikhil Kumar Singh from using deceptively similar trademarks and from publishing disparaging online content.A single-judge of Justice Jyoti Singh held that the videos and social media posts circulated by Singh are prima facie defamatory, disparaging, and abusive and are intended to tarnish PhysicsWallah's goodwill and reputation. Finding...

Bombay High Court Upholds ₹10.54 Crore Arbitration Award Against CADA In Beed Irrigation Project

The Bombay High Court has recently upheld a Rs. 10.54 crore arbitral award arising from delays in the repair and renovation of 19 minor irrigation tanks in Beed district, holding the Command Area Development Authority responsible for stalling the project. A Division Bench of Justices Arun R. Pedneker and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav dismissed an appeal filed by senior officials of the authority and affirmed the Commercial Court's refusal to set aside the award. The bench agreed with the arbitrator...

Customs Duty On Vessels Fixed On Import Date, Not On Foreign To Coastal Run Conversion: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court recently held that customs duty on a vessel is fixed on the date of its import and cannot be reopened later merely because the vessel is converted from foreign-going to coastal run. The court said a later change in how the vessel is operated does not create a fresh tax liability. A bench of Justice Anita Sumanth and Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar said the date of import is the only point that matters for determining liability under the customs law. “The critical event in...

'Ignoring Precedent Is Judicial Indiscipline': Madras High Court Restores Service Tax Refund

The court reiterated that service tax paid under a mistake of law is refundable and cannot be denied merely on the ground of limitation.

Delhi High Court Moves Interim Relief Plea From Court To Arbitration Forum After Parties Consent

The Delhi High Court has moved a plea for interim relief out of the courtroom and into arbitration after the parties agreed that their dispute should be resolved through arbitration. Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar was hearing a petition arising from a Memorandum of Understanding dated 3 November 2025 between IPEX Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Krishna Constructions, in which interim protection was sought. During the hearing, both sides told the Court that instead of deciding the plea on...

Delhi High Court Upholds Arbitral Award Ordering NHAI To Pay ₹12.18 Crores To Toll Operator For Revenue Loss

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a challenge by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) against an arbitral award granted to Kochi Aroor Tollways Private Limited (KATPL), upholding a compensation amount of approximately ₹12.18 crores.The award addressed losses KATPL sustained on the Edapally–Vyttila–Aroor road stretch in Kerala, specifically due to incorrectly fixed toll rates, delays in declaring the Commercial Operation Date, and the costs associated with issuing free monthly passes...

GST Not Payable On Transfer Of Leasehold Rights: Gujarat High Court Directs Refund

The Gujarat High Court, recently relying on its earlier ruling, reiterated that transferring or assigning leasehold rights in land is equivalent to the sale of land and therefore does not constitute a taxable 'supply' under the GST frameworkA Bench of Justice A. S. Supehia and Justice Pranav Trivedi was hearing a petition filed by Aquaeva Chemtech Private Limited, which had challenged the withholding of its GST refund relating to the transfer of leasehold rights in an industrial plot. The court...

Arbitration Law Bars Interim Relief Against Third Party Once Award Is Unenforceable: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has dismissed a petition filed by Ningbo Aux Imp & Exp Co. Ltd. seeking interim relief against Vijay Sales, holding that such relief cannot be granted once a foreign arbitral award has already been found unenforceable against that party. Justice Sandeep V. Marne noted that the foreign arbitral award in the case was passed only against Amstrad Consumer India Pvt. Ltd. Vijay Sales was not a party to the arbitration and had already been deleted from the award enforcement...