Supreme Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail To SRS Finance Director Ankit Sachdeva In Fraud Case, Issues Notice To SFIO

Kirit Singhania

2 April 2026 12:49 PM IST

  • Supreme Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail To SRS Finance Director Ankit Sachdeva In Fraud Case, Issues Notice To SFIO

    The Supreme Court on Thursday issued notice and made an order for pre-arrest bail to Ankit Sachdeva, a director of SRS Finance Ltd., whose anticipatory bail plea had earlier been dismissed by the Punjab & Haryana High Court by order dated March 4, 2024, which found prima facie involvement in a large-scale financial fraud.

    Sachdeva's petition before the top court challenges the High Court's refusal to grant anticipatory bail.

    A Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta passed the order while hearing the matter.

    The case arises from a large-scale investigation by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) into the affairs of SRS Group companies, initiated by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs on August 1, 2018. The probe revealed a massive financial fraud involving outstanding bank liabilities of approximately Rs 1,596 crore.

    It was alleged that the accused, including Ankit Sachdeva, a director of SRS Finance, were involved in siphoning and diverting funds through a network of related and shell companies while presenting falsified financial statements to secure loans from banks and financial institutions.

    On February 26, the Supreme Court had made interim protection from arrest absolute to Deepak Garg, another director of SRS.

    The investigation report of June 5, 2021 led to prosecution under multiple provisions of the Companies Act, including Sections 447 and 448 dealing with fraud and false statements. Specific allegations against the petitioner included signing financial statements for FY 2013-14 and 2014-15 that concealed related-party transactions and misrepresented the financial position of the company.

    The Punjab & Haryana High Court, while considering the anticipatory bail plea, observed that the material on record prima facie indicated the petitioner's active involvement in the fraud by knowingly furnishing false financial disclosures and dismissed the anticipatory bail plea.

    With the high court's refusal to grant him anticipatory bail, he has now approached the supreme court, which has sought a response from the SFIO.

    Click Here To Read/Download Punjab & Haryana HC Judgment

    Case Title :  Ankit Sachdeva vs Serious Fraud Investigation OfficeCase Number :  Diary No. 68309 of 2025
    Next Story