Bombay High Court Protects Kartik Aaryan's Personality Rights, Orders Removal Of Infringing Content

The Bombay High Court has granted temporary relief to actor Kartik Aaryan, restraining identified and unidentified defendants from unauthorised use of his name, image, voice and likeness across websites, social media platforms, AI-generated content and chatbots, holding that such use prima facie violates his personality/publicity rights and right to privacy. In an order dated April 15, 2026, Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh found a prima facie case of violation of personality and publicity rights,...

Supreme Court Dismisses Income Tax Appeal Against Nokia Over Gross Delay Of 286 Days

The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed the Income Tax Department's appeal against Nokia Corporation over a 286-day delay, leaving undisturbed the Delhi High Court's ruling that offshore supply of telecom equipment is not taxable, software payments are not royalty, and no permanent establishment existed in India.A Bench of Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan found no sufficient and satisfactory reason by the department to condone 286 days 'gross' delay and observed the following:“There is...

Can Delay Beyond Prescribed Time Limit In Service Tax Appeals Be Condoned Under Limitation Act? Supreme Court To Examine

The Supreme Court has agreed to examine whether delay in filing a service tax appeal beyond the 2-month deadline and the additional 1-month extension allowed under the law can be excused under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Section 5 of the Limitation Act allows courts to accept delayed filings if sufficient cause for the delay is shown. A Bench of Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice K.V. Viswanathan issued notice on April 13, 2026 while hearing a petition filed by assessee Morthala Sidda...

Bombay High Court Grants Relief To NSE, Orders Suspension Of Domains, Takedown of Trademark-Infringing Accounts

The Bombay High Court has recently granted ad interim relief to the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd, restraining unknown persons from infringing its “NSE” trademark and directing social media intermediaries and domain name registrars to remove or disable infringing accounts, channels, and domain names. Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh, in an order dated April 10, 2026, held that such a measure was necessary in public interest. “Considering the fact that an unsuspecting investor can be drawn...

Supreme Court Dismisses Paharpur Plea Against Sinnar Thermal Power, Bars Arbitral Award Execution Post CIRP

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed the special leave petition filed by Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd. against Sinnar Thermal Power Ltd., effectively affirming the Delhi High Court's order dated February 11, which held that once a resolution plan is approved under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), claims cannot be pursued through parallel arbitral award execution proceedings.A Bench of Justices Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Alok Aradhe, after hearing the parties, dismissed the...

Madras High Court Refuses To Fast-Track Karti Chidambaram's NCLT Plea Seeking Defreezing Of Bank Account

The Madras High Court on Thursday refused to direct the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chennai Bench, to expeditiously dispose of an application filed by Karti P. Chidambaram, son of former Union Minister P. Chidambaram, in PMLA proceedings against him, seeking defreezing of his bank account, holding that such directions would place “unnecessary pressure” on judicial forums. A Division Bench of Justice S.M. Subramaniam and Justice K. Surender said constitutional courts must exercise...

Delhi High Court To Pass Interim Order Protecting Actor Allu Arjun's Personality Rights

The Delhi High Court on Friday said it will pass interim orders in a personality rights suit filed by Telugu actor Allu Arjun, who seeks to restrain the unauthorized use of his name, likeness, and signature for commercial gain. Presiding over the matter, Justice Tushar Rao Gedela heard arguments on alleged infringement of the actor's personality rights, with the case focusing on specific instances of misuse of artificial intelligence tools such as voice cloning and fake video call applications....

Supreme Court Rejects Jharkhand's Plea Against SAIL, Upholds ₹30.29 Crore Input Tax Credit Relief

The Supreme Court of India dismissed State of Jharkhand's special leave petition against Steel Authority of India Ltd (SAIL) in a dispute concerning the transition of input tax credit (ITC) from the pre-GST regime, upholding the Jharkhand High Court's direction on January 30, 2025, to restore Rs. 30.29 crore with interest.A Bench of Justices Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Alok Aradhe found no ground to interfere with the high court's order and dismissed the appeal.The dispute arose from the...

Madras High Court Dismisses Actress Tamanna Bhatia's Rs 1 Crore Damages Claim Against Soap Maker

The court held that use of an actress’s image after expiry of an endorsement agreement amounts to violation of personality and privacy rights, but found no evidence linking the company to the alleged use.

LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: April 16, 2026

COMPETITION LAW CCI Finds No Anti-Competitive Conduct By Adani Entities , Azure Power In SECI Solar TenderNCLAT Upholds CCI Penalty In Railway Tender Cartel Case, Says Silence On Emails Shows Tacit ParticipationBANKING/NBFC Bank Receiving Cheques Acts As Agent Of Customer, Liable Under Consumer Law For Delay In Presentation: Supreme CourtSupreme Court Refuses Anil Ambani's Plea To Restore Stay On Banks' Fraud Classification ProceedingsIBC NCLT Bengaluru Dismisses Kingfisher Employees' Plea For...

Seat Alone Determines Jurisdiction, Not Where Arbitration Is Conducted Or Award Is Pronounced: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of India has set aside an order of the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court which had declined to hear a challenge to an arbitral award on the ground that it was delivered in New Delhi, holding that jurisdiction lies with courts at the seat of arbitration and cannot shift based on where proceedings are conducted or the award is rendered. A Bench of Justices Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Alok Aradhe said, “The mere fact that arbitral proceedings are conducted or the award...

CCI Finds No Anti-Competitive Conduct By Adani Entities , Azure Power In SECI Solar Tender

The Competition Commission of India on Thursday closed a complaint alleging that SECI's solar power tenders favoured Adani Group entities and Azure Power, finding no prima facie violation of competition law. A coram comprising Chairperson Ravneet Kaur and Members Anil Agrawal, Sweta Kakkad and Deepak Anurag held that no case was made out to warrant an investigation, observing: “Upon consideration of the facts and circumstances of the present case, the Commission is of the view that there is no...