Indirect Tax Weekly Round-Up: February 23 - March 01, 2026

SUPREME COURTCBIC's 2024 Policy Barring Govt Appeals Below ₹2 Crore Covers Pending Cases, Not Merely Future Filings: Supreme CourtCase Title : COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX . & ORS. VS VIKARAM CEMENT Case Number : Civil Appeal No(s). 710/2012 CITATION : 2026 LLBiz SC 82Holding that the Centre's 2024 litigation policy applies even to pending appeals, the Supreme Court on February 5, 2026 dismissed appeals filed by the Commissioner of Commercial Tax against Vikaram Cement, ruling that the...

Direct Tax Weekly Round-Up: February 23 - March 01, 2026

SUPREME COURTSupreme Court Dismisses Revenue SLP Against Bombay HC Ruling On Tax Assessments Of Merged Reliance EntitiesCase Title : DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 3 VS M/S RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD Case Number : Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7819/2026 CITATION : 2026 LLBiz SC 92The Supreme Court recently declined to entertain the Income Tax Department's Special Leave Petition against a Bombay High Court judgment that had quashed assessment orders passed in the names of Reliance...

Allahabad High Court Grants Oppo Interim Relief In ₹599 Crore GST Case, Issues Notice On Challenge To CGST Section 15(3)(b)

The Allahabad High Court has recently granted interim protection to Oppo Mobile India Private Limited in its challenge to the validity of Section 15(3)(b) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, after an adjudication order confirmed a total tax demand of Rs 599.07 crore along with equivalent penalty and interest under Section 74 of the Act, according to the writ petition. The order in challenge dated December 12, 2025, confirmed demands of Integrated Goods and Services Tax, Central...

CESTAT Sets Aside Rs 24.96 Lakh Service Tax Demand Against Contractor Based Only On TDS Statement

The Kolkata Bench of CESTAT has set aside a service tax demand of Rs 24.96 lakh against a Chakradharpur contractor, holding that his work for the Railways, exempt subcontracted projects, and construction of single residential units did not attract service tax. The bench of Judicial Member Ashok Jindal and Technical Member K. Anpazhakan held that a demand cannot stand if it is based solely on Form 26AS data without corroborative evidence or independent inquiry. Form 26AS is an annual tax...

BSNL VRS Retirees Absorbed From DoT Entitled To Leave Encashment Tax Exemption: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has held that retired BSNL employees who were originally absorbed from the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) are entitled to full income-tax exemption on leave encashment under the Income Tax Act, 1961.The writ petition was filed by the Sanchar Nigam Pensioners' Welfare Association and two retired officers of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, who had opted for the BSNL voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2019.The grievance arose when BSNL deducted tax at source on leave...

No Bar On CENVAT Credit Where Supplementary Invoice Is Not Linked To Suppression: CESTAT Kolkata

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 13 February, allowed an appeal by Agrasen Sponge Pvt. Ltd., holding that CENVAT credit claimed on the basis of supplementary invoices issued by Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. (MCL) is admissible where the additional duty arose due to an interpretational dispute and not on account of suppression or fraud. A Bench comprising Judicial Member R. Muralidhar set aside the order of the Commissioner (Appeals),...

No Excise Duty On Dolochar Generated During Sponge Iron Production: CESTAT Kolkata

The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that 'dolochar' generated during the manufacture of sponge iron is an inevitable waste and not a manufactured excisable product. Therefore no central excise duty is payable on its clearance. A Bench comprising Judicial Member Ashok Jindal and Technical Member K. Anpazhakan was hearing an appeal filed by Kaushal Ferro Metals (P) Ltd., challenging the confirmation of excise duty along with interest and...

Service Tax Is Leviable On Repair Services Provided To Kolkata Metro: CESTAT New Delhi

The New Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 26 February, held that repair and maintenance services rendered to the Kolkata Metro Railway are not eligible for tax exemption under the Mega Exemption Notification. A Bench comprising Judicial Member Dr. Rachna Gupta, focussed on whether such services could be treated as exempt railway-related works and whether the Department was justified in invoking the extended period to confirm the service tax demand. ...

MS Frame Parts, Tanks Built To Customer Drawings Not Articles of Iron & Steel; CESTAT Ahmedabad Sets Aside Excise Duty Demand

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that MS frame parts, gland plates and MS tanks manufactured as per buyer-specific drawings for use in transformers cannot be treated as general articles of iron and steel. The Tribunal set aside the demand for differential excise duty of Rs.3.69 lakhs raised against Gayatri Engineering, along with interest and penalty.A coram of Judicial Member Ajaya Krishna Vishvesha and Technical Member...

GST Appellate Tribunal Can Grant Interim Relief, Including Stay On Recovery: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has recently held that the GST Appellate Tribunal possesses inherent and incidental powers to grant interim relief. This includes protection against recovery pending disposal of appeals. The Court said that any interpretation to the contrary would render the appellate remedy “illusory” and defeat legislative intent. A Division Bench of Justices G.S. Kulkarni and Aarti Sathe was hearing a writ petition filed by The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd. The bank...

ITAT Delhi Remands Dispute Over ₹32.13 Lakh Addition Based On Seized Excel Sheet

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has restored to the Assessing Officer a dispute in relation to the addition of Rs 32.13 lakh made against a Greater Noida taxpayer in connection with the purchase of a commercial unit. The tribunal directed that all material relied upon must be furnished to the taxpayer and cross-examination allowed if any statements are used to sustain the addition. Judicial Member C.N. Prasad noted that the addition arose from an Excel sheet seized...

Is Cane Development Council A 'Local Authority' Or An 'AOP'? Delhi ITAT Remands Nanauta Parishad's Case For Fresh Examination

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has remanded to the Assessing Officer the case of Ganna Vikas Parishad, Nanauta, holding that the authorities below had not examined the constitution and activities of the taxpayer while sustaining an addition of Rs 32,91,119 and denying its claim of exemption. Judicial Member C.N. Prasad observed that although he “could not find fault with the reasoning of the Ld. CIT(A) in sustaining the addition,” the authorities had failed to...