Two-Year GST Refund Limitation Starts From Date Of Correct Payment: Kerala High Court

Earlier this month, the Kerala High Court held that the two-year limitation period under the GST law to claim refunds begins from the date on which tax is paid under the correct head, and not from the date of an earlier mistaken payment. The ruling was delivered by Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. while allowing a writ petition filed by Pushpagiri Medical Society, a registered non-profit organisation running a hospital and medical education institutions in Kerala. The Bench observed: “The right to...

GSTAT Delhi Confirms ₹19.3 Lakh Profiteering Liability on Park Avenue After-Shave Distributor

The Delhi Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) on 27 January directed sellers of Park Avenue After-Shave Lotion to deposit Rs. 19,32,446 into the Consumer Welfare Fund, confirming the revised profiteering allegations against them. The ruling comes after a major correction in the profiteering calculations, following the identification of duplication of invoices, which had caused the original financial demand to be overstated.A Bench comprising Dr. Sanjaya Kumar Mishra,...

Tax Recovery Officer Can't Void Third-Party Mortgages: Madras High Court In Sree Gokulam Chit's Case

The Madras High Court has recently set aside an income tax recovery order that had declared a mortgage created in favour of Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance, a chit fund part of the Gokulam Group, as void from the outset. Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy held that the Income Tax Department can recover its dues by selling an attached property, but the Tax Recovery Officer cannot decide the validity of a transfer in favour of a third party. The court said the recovery framework does not permit such...

Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Rejection Of GST Appeal Over 13-Day Delay

The Gujarat High Court recently set aside an appellate order rejecting a GST appeal solely on the ground of a 13-day delay, holding that the appellate authority had failed to exercise its discretion under the law despite having the power to condone the delay. A bench of Justice A.S. Supehia and Justice Pranav Trivedi held that the delay fell within the additional 30-day condonable period available beyond the 90-day statutory limitation under Section 107(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax...

Contractors Can't Be Made To Pay Past TDS Shortfall By Contracting Authority: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court recently held that Rail Coach Factory (RCF) cannot recover differential tax deducted at source (TDS) from contractors for past periods once the contractors' VAT liability has already been assessed and paid. A Bench of Justice Jagmohan Bansal and Justice Amarinder Singh Grewal was hearing writ petitions filed by G.S. Builders, Inderjit Bajaj and R. Tech Builders. The contractors had challenged recovery notices issued by RCF seeking to deduct additional amounts...

Tax Refund Must Be Determined By Nature of Service, Not Registration Mistake: CESTAT Ahmedabad

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 23 January, set aside the rejection of a service tax refund claim filed by Dubond Infotech Private Limited, ruling that a clerical error in service tax registration cannot, by itself, defeat a refund claim for exported software development services. A Bench comprising Judicial Member Ajaya Krishna Vishvesha and Technical Member Satendra Vikram Singh noted that the company had mistakenly obtained...

New Constructions Cannot Be Taxed In Appeals Against Earlier Property Assessments: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on 22 January held that new constructions cannot be brought to tax while deciding statutory appeals filed against earlier property tax assessments. It clarified that the scope of such appeals is confined to examining the validity of the existing demand and cannot be expanded to assess buildings constructed subsequently. A Bench of Justice Harisankar V. Menon observed: “The assessment as regards new constructions, if any, requires to be carried out with reference to the...

Tax Authorities Must Return Title Deed Given As Security Or Certify Its Loss: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has clarified that where an assessee furnishes an original title deed to the tax Department as security, the authorities are duty-bound either to trace and return the document or to formally certify that it has been irretrievably lost. Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A., by a judgment delivered on 16 January, was deciding a writ petition filed by M/s Bash-P-International, a partnership firm earlier registered under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act). The Court...

Supreme Court Upholds Odisha Entry Tax Act, Dismisses Tata Sponge Iron's Challenge

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed Tata Sponge Iron Limited's challenge to the constitutional validity of the Odisha Entry Tax Act, 1999, and upheld the Orissa High Court's refusal to entertain the plea. The company had also sought a refund of entry tax collected by the State of Odisha. A bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and Prasanna B. Varale said there was no reason to interfere with the High Court's order. “We do not find any infirmity in the impugned order,” the court said. Tata...

Delhi High Court Says Impermissible Foreign Tax Reference Can't Extend Limitation For Search Assessments

The Delhi High Court has ruled that the Income Tax Department cannot extend the time limit for completing search assessments merely by making a reference to a foreign tax authority if the information sought is not permissible under the applicable tax treaty. Dismissing a batch of appeals filed by the Revenue, a Division Bench of Justices Dinesh Mehta and Vinod Kumar upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's finding that assessment orders passed for Assessment Years 2011–12 to 2017–18 were...

CESTAT Allows Service Tax Refund Claims of Nokia Solutions' Sriperumbudur SEZ Unit

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that Nokia Solutions and Networks India Pvt. Ltd. is entitled to a refund of service tax paid on services approved for authorised operations in its Special Economic Zone unit. The appeal was decided by Technical Member Vasa Seshagiri Rao, who set aside the rejection of refund claims totalling Rs 46.20 lakh while upholding the denial of Rs 4,220 linked to invoices raised on the company's Gurgaon unit. ...

Imported Parts Alone Don't Justify Higher Sales Tax On Car Audio Systems: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has ruled, in a dispute over the tax treatment of Kenwood-branded car audio systems, that the use of imported components does not by itself make the finished product an imported good, holding that “the parts do not, by themselves, constitute a complete car audio system”. A bench of Justices Anita Sumanth and Mummineni Sudheer Kumar was deciding whether Nippon Audiotronix's car audio systems were taxable at 12.5 percent as domestic goods or at 20 percent as imported...