Finance Bill 2026: 12% Surcharge on Buybacks Applies Only to Additional Tax on Promoters'; Income Tax Dept. Clarifies

The Income Tax Department has clarified that the proposed 12% surcharge in the Finance Bill, 2026 will apply only to the additional income-tax payable by promoters on capital gains arising from buybacks, and not on the entire gains. In a clarification issued on March 26, 2026, the Department explained that the amendment relates to taxation of capital gains earned by promoters when companies buy back their own shares under section 68 of the Companies Act, 2013, which governs share...

Cash Deposits During Demonetisation Cannot Be Treated As Unexplained If Recorded In Books: ITAT Chennai

The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on 3 March 2026 held that cash deposits made during the demonetisation period cannot be treated as unexplained under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, if corresponding sales are accepted and recorded in the books of account. A Bench comprising Judicial Member S.S. Viswanethra Ravi and Accountant Member S.R. Raghunatha allowed an appeal by Vinayaga Fireworks, a Sivakasi-based cracker manufacturer, against an order of the...

Anti-Profiteering Interest Liability Arises At Time of Supply, Not Completion Certificate: GSTAT Delhi

Recently, the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), in New Delhi, held that liability to pay interest on profiteered amounts arises from the time of supply, that is, when excess consideration is collected from buyers, and not from the date of obtaining a completion certificate. A Single Bench comprising Technical Member A. Venu Prasad passed the order on 19 March in an appeal filed by the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) against Unnathi Associates, developer of the...

Gujarat High Court Condones Delay In Filing Income Tax Return, Finds Accountant's Error Caused Genuine Hardship

The Gujarat High Court has held that a taxpayer's delay in filing its income tax return due to a bona fide misunderstanding of audit requirements under Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, resulting in denial of a tax deduction under Section 80-IAB for Special Economic Zone developers, constitutes “genuine hardship” warranting condonation.The case arose from the petitioner firm's failure to file its return of income for Assessment Year 2023–24 within the prescribed due date of 31 July 2023. The...

Bona Fide Delay Justifies Tax Benefit, “Genuine Hardship” Must Be Liberally Applied: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court on 16 March, held that a bona fide delay of 53 days in filing Form 10-IC cannot deprive an eligible taxpayer of concessional tax benefits. The expression “genuine hardship” under the Income Tax Act must be given a liberal, justice-oriented interpretation. Form 10-IC is a declaration filed by a company to opt for the concessional corporate tax rate under Section 115BAA of the Income Tax Act.A Bench comprising Justice A.S. Supehia and Justice Pranav Trivedi allowed...

Bona Fide Delay In Filing Tax Appeal Caused By Pursuing Alternate Remedy Condonable: ITAT Chennai

The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that a delay of 1036 days in filing an appeal could be condoned when it arose from pursuing an alternate remedy and was not deliberate. A Bench comprising Vice President George George K and Accountant Member S.R. Raghunatha, in an appeal filed by A-One Leathers for Assessment Year 2015-16, remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer to examine a claim of double taxation. It observed: “The delay… neither wanton nor willful but...

Ad-Hoc Estimation of Income Without Rejecting Books of Account Not Permissible: ITAT Kolkata

The Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on 17 February 2026 held that income cannot be estimated on an ad-hoc basis without first rejecting the books of account, and set aside an addition made on that basis while quashing the reassessment proceedings. The Bench comprising Accountant Member Rajesh Kumar and Judicial Member Pradip Kumar Choubey allowed the appeal filed by Rakhi Mondal for Assessment Year 2017-18. It held: “the said reopening has been done without meeting...

Double Taxation Of Share Application Money Impermissible: ITAT Kolkata

The Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on 6 March, held that taxing share application money already taxed in the hands of investor companies amounts to impermissible double addition. The Bench comprising Accountant Member Rajesh Kumar and Judicial Member Pradip Kumar Choubey dismissed the Revenue's appeal against Littlestar Securities Pvt. Ltd. for Assessment Year 2012-13 and upheld the deletion of Rs. 27.63 crore added as unexplained cash credit. The Tribunal...

Amortised Cost Of Moulds And Dies Includible In Assessable Value Under Excise Act: CESTAT Chennai

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 25 March 2026 held that the amortised value of moulds and dies supplied by customers must be included in the assessable value of finished goods under excise law. A Bench comprising Technical Member Vasa Seshagiri Rao and Judicial Member Ajayan T.V. partly allowed the appeal filed by Best Cast IT Ltd., a manufacturer of aluminium die-cast automotive components. The Tribunal noted: "The statutory...

Import Value Cannot Be Re-Determined Solely Based On Local Engineer Certificate: CESTAT Chennai

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal on 25 March held that the declared value of imported second-hand machinery cannot be rejected and re-determined solely on the basis of a local Chartered Engineer's certificate. A Bench comprising Judicial Member P. Dinesha and Technical Member Vasa Seshagiri Rao allowed an appeal filed by Abirami Weaving Mills against an order of the Commissioner (Appeals), Tiruchirappalli. It held: “...we are of the view that the...

Supreme Court Sets Aside Excise Demand On RCF, Says Exemption On Naphtha Depends On Intended Use

The Supreme Court has set aside central excise duty demands raised against Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd over alleged wrongful availment of exemption on Naphtha procured for use in the manufacture of fertilizer, holding that in the facts of the case the benefit of the exemption notification could not be denied merely because the fuel was used in a common steam generation plant supplying different units of the factory.The case arose from a series of show cause notices issued over...

GSTAT Confirms Anti-Profiteering Demand Against Real Estate Company, Directs Refund Of ₹17.75 Lakh

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) on 23 March confirmed an anti-profiteering demand against Duville Estates Pvt. Ltd, a real estate developer, directed it to pay Rs. 17,75,622 along with applicable interest to homebuyers. A Single Member Bench comprising Judicial Member Justice Mayank Kumar Jain accepting the findings of the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), recorded: “the report of the DGAP dated 18.12.2024 is accordingly accepted.” The DGAP had...