Ten-Year Block For Non-Searched Person To Be Computed From Receipt Of Seized Material, Not Search Date: ITAT Delhi

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that, in the case of a person who was not subjected to a search, the relevant assessment block must be computed with reference to the date on which the jurisdictional Assessing Officer records satisfaction after receiving the seized material and not with reference to the date of the search conducted on a third party. A bench of Judicial Member Sudhir Kumar and Accountant Member Naveen Chandra dismissed two appeals filed by the...

Indexed Cost Of Construction Must Be Allowed Where Building Details Form Part Of Sale Deed: ITAT Chennai

The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a taxpayer cannot be denied the benefit of indexation on the cost of construction where details relating to the building are already available in the registered sale deed and form part of the material on record. A coram of Judicial Member Manu Kumar Giri and Accountant Member Gagan Goyal allowed an appeal filed by Ramatas Revathi. "The benefit of indexation of cost is a statutory consequence flowing from section 48 of...

CESTAT Chennai Bars Extended Limitation In CERA Audit Case, Says Issue Interpretational, Not Suppression

On 9 June, the Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that authorities cannot invoke the extended period of limitation under service tax law when a dispute arises from a CERA audit objection and the Department itself contests the audit findings, as such circumstances indicate an interpretational issue rather than suppression of facts by Precision Equipments Chennai Pvt. Ltd. Judicial Member P. Dinesha and Technical Member M. Ajit Kumar allowed the...

CESTAT Chennai Quashes Service Tax Demand On Proprietorship, Rejects Liability For Erstwhile Firm

On 10 June, the Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the Department cannot fasten service tax liability on a proprietorship concern for dues arising from an erstwhile partnership firm without establishing any transfer, amalgamation, or successor liability. Judicial Member Ajayan T.V. and Technical Member M. Ajit Kumar reiterated that composite works contracts executed prior to 1 June 2007 cannot be subjected to service tax under the...

Result Of Assessment Proceedings Has Bearing On Criminal Prosecution Under GST: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court on 20 May held that the outcome of assessment proceedings can have a material bearing on criminal prosecution under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime. Justice Vikram D. Chauhan granted bail to Shakib Qureshi and observed that, although criminal prosecution and assessment proceedings are independent, findings in assessment proceedings may affect a criminal case. He observed: “Although criminal prosecution is not barred and are independent proceedings. However,...

High Court Fare Approval Cannot Defeat GST Anti-Profiteering Mandate For Cinema Operators: GSTAT Delhi

The Delhi Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) on 27 May held that permission granted by State authorities or the Telangana High Court to collect proposed ticket fares cannot override the statutory obligation under Section 171 of the CGST Act to pass on the benefit of GST rate reduction to consumers through a commensurate reduction in prices. A Bench comprising Technical Member A. Venu Prasad dismissed the appeal filed by ASR Cinema LLP and affirmed the profiteering...

CESTAT Mumbai Quashes Continued Suspension Of Nhava Sheva CFS, Notes No Inquiry Was Initiated

The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at Mumbai has set aside an order continuing the suspension of a Container Freight Station (CFS) operated by International Cargo Terminal Private Limited (ICTPL) at Nhava Sheva. The tribunal held that Customs authorities had not substantiated the grounds for continuing the immediate suspension. A bench of Judicial Member S.K. Mohanty and Technical Member M.M. Parthiban observed: "In view of the above, we set aside the order dated...

CESTAT New Delhi Holds CENVAT Credit Does Not Lapse If Other Dutiable Final Products Continue

On 18 May, the New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that CENVAT credit lying in balance does not lapse merely because some final products become exempt from excise duty, as long as other final products manufactured from the same inputs continue to attract duty. President Justice Dilip Gupta and Technical Member P. Anjani Kumar dismissed three Departmental appeals and upheld the order dropping demands exceeding Rs.22.88 crore against Sharp...

Mark-Up On Ocean Freight Cannot Be Taxed Merely Because It Exceeds Actual Freight Paid: CESTAT Chennai

On 10 June, the Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that a freight forwarder's mark-up or profit on ocean freight charges cannot be subjected to service tax merely because the amount collected from customers exceeds the freight actually paid to shipping lines. Judicial Member Ajayan T.V. and Technical Member M. Ajit Kumar allowed the appeal filed by GAC Shipping (India) Pvt. Ltd. and set aside the service tax demand, interest, and penalties...

SIPCOT Water Infrastructure Charges Exempt From Service Tax Under Section 104: CESTAT Chennai

On 10 June, the Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the one-time amount collected by the State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Ltd. (SIPCOT) from industrial allottees towards water supply infrastructure is exempt from Service Tax under Section 104 of the Finance Act, 1994. Judicial Member Ajayan T.V. and Technical Member M. Ajit Kumar allowed SIPCOT's appeal and set aside the Service Tax demand, interest, and penalty imposed...

GST Registration Can Be Restored On Filing Pending Returns, Clearing Dues Under Rule 22(4): Gauhati HC

The Gauhati High Court on 1 June held that a taxpayer whose GST registration has been cancelled for non-filing of returns can seek restoration of registration by furnishing pending returns and clearing tax dues, interest, penalty and late fees in terms of the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017. A Bench of Justice Kardak Ete disposed of the petition filed by Md. Nekib Hussain, proprietor of Nekib Hussain, who challenged the cancellation of his GST registration and sought restoration...

Customs Cannot Reclassify Dolomite as Marble Based on Other Importers' Test Reports: CESTAT Mumbai

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 8 June held that customs authorities cannot reclassify imported goods as marble blocks by relying on test reports of consignments imported by other entities when laboratory reports of the importer's own goods classify them as dolomite. Judicial Member S.K. Mohanty and Technical Member M.M. Parthiban allowed the appeals filed by Shri Parasnath Exports and its partner Sampat Ostwal against the order passed by...