Madras High Court Quashes Bank Account Attachment Under GST For Lack Of Tangible Material

The Madras High Court on 8 July held that a provisional attachment of a taxpayer's bank accounts under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act cannot be sustained merely by reproducing the statutory language without disclosing any tangible material or reasons to justify the action. Section 83 of the CGST Act empowers the Commissioner to provisionally attach a taxpayer's property, including bank accounts, to protect government revenue during the pendency of specified...

State Cannot Recover Unintended Benefit From Contractor After Accepting Lump Sum Contract: Telangana HC

The Telangana High Court on 9 July held that the State cannot withhold a contractor's security deposit by raising a claim of “unintended benefit” from Central Excise Duty exemption after accepting a lump-sum contract value without accounting for the exemption at the tender stage. A Division Bench of Justices Moushumi Bhattacharya and Gadi Praveen Kumar dismissed the State's appeal and partly allowed the appeal filed by Gammon Engineers and Contractors Pvt. Ltd. by setting aside the liberty...

CESTAT Delhi Allows Pharma Company's ₹70 Lakh Refund, Holds Claim Not Hit By Unjust Enrichment

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has allowed a pharma company's appeal and held that its refund claim of about ₹70 lakh was not hit by unjust enrichment, setting aside orders directing the amount to be credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund.The ruling was delivered by a tribunal comprising Judicial Member Binu Tamta and Technical Member P.V. Subba Rao.Vivek Pharmachem India Ltd., which manufactures medicaments, had availed CENVAT credit of about ₹70 lakh...

Centre Notifies Oman's Social Protection Fund For Tax Exemption On Eligible Investments In India

The central government has notified Oman's Social Protection Fund (SPF) as a specified person eligible to claim tax exemption on qualifying investments made in India under the Income Tax Act, 2025. This will apply to eligible investments made from the date of publication of the notification in the Official Gazette until March 31, 2030, subject to prescribed conditions.The notification, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), requires the fund to file income tax returns within the...

Best Judgment Assessment Cannot Ignore VAT Composition Scheme Compliance By Contractor: Telangana HC

The Telangana High Court on 13 July held that a best judgment assessment cannot be sustained when the assessing authority fails to consider the statutory composition scheme opted by a works contractor and ignores the records maintained in accordance with the law. A Division Bench comprising Justices P. Sam Koshy and Nandikonda Narsing Rao set aside the assessment order passed against Chaitanya Enterprises, a proprietary concern engaged in electrical contracting works, which had challenged the...

Karnataka High Court Holds S. 271DA Penalty Begins Only With S. 274 Notice, Reads In Six Month Limit

The Karnataka High Court on 7 July held that penalty proceedings under Section 271DA of the Income Tax Act commence only when the Joint Commissioner issues a show cause notice under Section 274, and not when the Assessing Officer merely forwards a proposal for initiating penalty. A Division Bench of Justices S.G. Pandit and K.V. Aravind partly allowed a batch of ten Revenue appeals, clarifying that, although the Act does not prescribe a time limit for issuing a notice under Section 274, the...

Delhi High Court Upholds Confiscation of 2.7 kg Undeclared Gold, Says Experienced Traveller Knew Customs Rules

The Delhi High Court has upheld the confiscation of over 2.7 kilograms of gold brought into India from Dubai without declaration, observing that the petitioner's experience as an international traveller showed that he was fully aware of his obligation to declare dutiable goodsA Division Bench of Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Shail Jain refused to interfere with the concurrent findings of the adjudicating authority, the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) and the revisional authority, which had held...

Supreme Court Directs FanMade11, 9Stacks To Pursue GST Appeal Instead Of Writ Petitions

The Supreme Court has disposed of writ petitions filed by two online gaming companies, FanMade11 Fantasy Sports Private Limited and 9Stacks, challenging GST proceedings against them. A bench of Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice K. Vinod Chandran heard both pleas. The court directed both companies to pursue the statutory remedies available under the GST law instead of invoking its writ jurisdiction. In the matter involving 9Stacks, the court held that since a final assessment order had...

Income Tax Order Not Invalid If DIN Is Communicated Later Through Separate Intimation: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has held that an income tax order initially communicated without a Document Identification Number (DIN) does not become invalid merely because the DIN is communicated later through a separate authenticated intimation letter. The court held that the procedure substantially complied with CBDT Circular No. 19/2019 as it maintained the audit trail and authenticity of departmental communications. A Division Bench of Justice S.G. Pandit and Justice K.V. Aravind allowed two...

KVAT Revision Orders Must Be Passed Within Five Years Of Order Sought To Be Revised: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has held that tax authorities cannot keep suo motu revision proceedings under the Karnataka Value Added Tax (KVAT) Act pending indefinitely after initiating them within the statutory four-year period. While the authority validly initiates revision by calling for records within four years of the order proposed to be revised, the final revisional order must also be passed within a reasonable time, the court ruled. A division bench of Justice S.G. Pandit and Justice K.V....

Madras High Court Holds Lease Area Reduction Cannot Attract Fresh Stamp Duty, Orders ₹1.15 Cr Refund

The Madras High Court on 13 July held that an amendment agreement executed only to reduce the leased area of a property does not create a fresh lease and cannot be subjected to a fresh levy of stamp duty. A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the order directing refund of over Rs. 1.15 crore collected as stamp duty from Tata Communications Data Centers Pvt. Ltd. (now STT Global Data Centres...

GST Adjudicating Authority Not Bound To Seek Additional Documents Before Passing Order: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that an adjudicating authority under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is not obliged to call for additional documents or clarifications from a business merely because it finds the material placed on record to be insufficient to determine tax liability.A Division Bench of Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Shail Jain dismissed a writ petition filed by Sodexo India, challenging a GST demand of around ₹8.75 crore.The Court rejected Sodexo's contention that the...