Aircraft Flown Commercially Without DGCA Approval Cannot Claim Customs Duty Exemption: CESTAT Delhi

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has held that an aircraft imported duty-free for non-scheduled charter services cannot retain the exemption when it is commercially operated without the DGCA approval required under the exemption.A bench comprising Officiating President Dr. Rachna Gupta and Technicla Member P.V. Subba Rao was dealing with appeals filed by Mega Corporation Ltd., its Managing Director Kunal Lalani, and CEO Anil Kumar Soni.Mega Corporation...

Karnataka High Court Seeks State's Response To PVR INOX Plea Against 2% Cinema Ticket Cess

The Karnataka High Court has sought the State government's response to a plea challenging the 2% cess imposed on cinema tickets under the Karnataka Cine and Cultural Activists (Welfare) Act, 2024.A bench of Justice H.T. Narendra Prasad directed the State to take notice and observed that the issue concerning the applicability of the relevant provisions would be considered after examining whether the 2024 Act has formally come into force.The matter is listed for further hearing tomorrow. The...

GST Introduced After Tender Cannot Be Treated As Included In Quoted Rates: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur has ruled that a contractor cannot be denied GST reimbursement by relying on tender clauses requiring quoted rates to include “applicable taxes” when GST was not in existence when the tender was issued.A Division Bench of Justice Anil S. Kilor and Justice Raj D. Wakode, relying on the tender clasues observed,"The taxes which are not recoverable by the Government from the contractors, on the date of tender, cannot be the basis for quoting the rates while submitting...

CESTAT Chennai Upholds Toyota's Classification Of Nine Imported Sensors, Sets Aside Reclassification

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has upheld Toyota Kirloskar Motors Pvt. Ltd.'s classification of nine imported sensors as thermistors, gas-analysis apparatus, measuring or checking instruments, motor-vehicle parts and electrical apparatus.“The goods have to be classified in the condition in which they are imported, having regard to their objective characteristics and function,” the tribunal observed. It also held that where the Revenue seeks...

Authorised Courier Not Liable For Export Of Prohibited Goods Without Proof Of Knowledge: CESTAT Chennai

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 9 September held that an authorised courier cannot be penalised merely because prohibited goods are found concealed in an export consignment, unless the Revenue establishes the courier's knowledge, participation or a specific act or omission connecting it with the attempted improper export. A Division Bench comprising Judicial Member P. Dinesha and Technical Member M. Ajit Kumar allowed an appeal filed by...

GST Appeal Limitation To Run From Rectification Order Where Application Filed In Time: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has ruled that a GST appeal cannot be rejected as time-barred by calculating limitation solely from the original adjudication order when the assessee had filed a rectification application within the prescribed period and the application was subsequently decided by the adjudicating authority.A Division Bench comprising Justice A.S. Supehia and Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati observed, “It would not be permissible to reject the appeal on the ground of limitation by computing...

Telangana High Court Upholds Gimpex's Target Plus Duty Exemption, Says Broad Nexus Sufficient

The Telangana High Court on 11 August upheld the relief granted to Gimpex Limited, holding that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked in the absence of material showing fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts with an intent to evade duty. A Division Bench comprising Justices P. Sam Koshy and Narsing Rao Nandikonda observed that a strict product-to-product nexus between imported and exported goods was not required to claim duty exemption under the Target Plus Scheme....

Madras High Court Says Appeal Against Fresh Assessment Order Statutorily Barred, Remands BHEL Matter

The Madras High Court on 10 August remanded Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited's (BHEL) tax matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment. A Division Bench comprising Justices Dr. G. Jayachandran and N. Mala passed the order while disposing of a Tax Case Revision filed by BHEL against the order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal. The judges held: “The assessment orders in the instant case and the orders of the Appellate Authority are verbose and detailed. However, the fact remains that...

Gauhati High Court Directs Refund Of Cess Paid Under Mistake Of Law By Oil India And ONGC

The Gauhati High Court on 27 August held that the Central Excise Department cannot retain Education Cess (EC) and Secondary & Higher Education Cess (SHEC) paid under a mistake of law merely because the refund claim was filed beyond the prescribed limitation period. A Division Bench comprising Justices Michael Zothankhuma and Anjan Moni Kalita dismissed appeals filed by the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Dibrugarh, in matters concerning Oil India Limited and Oil and Natural Gas...

Madras High Court Upholds Deletion Of ₹70.95 Cr. Tax Additions In Bogus Long Term Capital Gains Cases

The Madras High Court on 28 August upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's orders deleting tax additions of Rs. 32.90 crore and Rs. 38.05 crore in cases concerning Long Term Capital Gains claimed from the sale of shares in PFL Infotech Limited and Risa International Limited. A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan dismissed the Revenue's appeals and the connected appeals concerning penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax...

TPO Cannot Reject Comparables Merely To Adopt Department's Preferred Set: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court on 28 August held that a Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) cannot reject comparable companies selected by a taxpayer merely to replace them with a standard set of comparables preferred by the Income Tax Department, holding that the selection or exclusion of comparables must satisfy the requirements under the Income Tax Act and Rule 10B of the Income Tax Rules. A Division Bench of Justices S.G. Pandit and K.V. Aravind allowed the batch of transfer pricing appeals, including...

Delhi High Court Waives ₹4.5 Lakh Penalty After Finding Service Tax Default Was Bona Fide, Not Deliberate

The Delhi High Court has set aside a ₹4.5 lakh penalty imposed on a consultancy firm for non-payment of service tax, holding that the default arose from a bona fide and reasonable belief regarding the taxability of its services and was not a deliberate attempt to evade tax.The Division Bench of Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora set aside the penalty imposed on Appellant under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and observed,“the non-payment of service tax by the Appellant...