Bombay High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds ITAT Order, Says Tata Power's Broadband Trial Run Income, Scrap Sale Not Taxable
The Bombay High Court has recently dismissed an appeal filed by the Income Tax Department against The Tata Power Company Ltd. It held that income from trial runs of its broadband project and the sale of scrap generated before the project's installation were capital receipts not liable to tax.Observing that income generated before the commencement of business that is "inextricably connected with the setting up of a capital asset" is capital in nature and serves to reduce the cost of construction,...
Bombay High Court Dismisses 'SUNDAY' Trademark Renewal Plea, Finds Notice Properly Dispatched
The Bombay High Court has dismissed a writ petition seeking renewal of the trademark "SUNDAY". It held that the Trade Marks Registry had discharged its obligation to issue a renewal notice before the registration expired by proving that it had been properly dispatched.A division bench of Acting Chief Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge and Justice Gautam A. Ankhad held that once the Registry proved proper dispatch of the notice to the address for service, the statutory presumption of service came into...
Bombay High Court Temporarily Restrains Niravi From Using 'SAPAT' Trademark For Tea
The Bombay High Court has restrained Niravi Consumer LLP and its associated entities from using the trademark "SAPAT" in relation to tea, holding that they failed to establish any independent right to use the mark for tea.Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh held that Niravi's continued use of "SAPAT" signages while selling "NIRAVI" tea was likely to cause confusion and infringed SAPAT International Private Limited's registered trademark."the consumers would enter the shops being drawn by the signages...
Fresh Employment Agreement Doesn't Automatically End Arbitration Clause In Earlier Contract: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has recently held that execution of a fresh employment agreement does not, by itself, extinguish an arbitration agreement contained in an earlier contract. It observed that whether the earlier contract stood completely substituted depends on the parties' intention, which must be gathered from the overall transaction rather than from the later agreement alone.Justice Amit Borkar delivered the ruling while partly allowing a petition filed by Sarla Advantech Private Limited...
Wife's Failure To Disclose Husband As Home Loan Co-Borrower Not Material Suppression: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court on 21 July held that a borrower's failure to disclose that her husband was a co-borrower in a housing loan could not, in the facts of the case, be treated as material suppression so as to deny her release of a property attached under the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (MPID) Act. A Division Bench of Justices A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata quashed the order dated 25 November 2021 passed by the Special Judge under the MPID Act, which had refused to release...
Sale Certificate Issued By Liquidator In IBC Auction Exempt From Registration, Stamp Duty: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has held that a liquidator conducting a public auction under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) qualifies as an officer under the Registration Act. Therefore, a sale certificate issued during such an auction is exempt from compulsory registration and stamp duty.The exemption continues so long as only a copy of the sale certificate is filed with the registering authority. Stamp duty becomes payable only if the purchaser later seeks to use the sale certificate for any...
SEBI Special Court Must Hear Accused Before Taking Cognizance Of Complaint Under BNSS: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court on 15 July held that a Special Court constituted under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 cannot take cognizance of offences on a complaint filed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) without first providing the accused an opportunity of hearing under the first proviso to Section 223(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), which mandates a pre-cognizance hearing in complaint cases. Justice N.J. Jamadar quashed an order of...
Bombay High Court Imposes ₹82 Lakh Costs On Hair Cream Manufacturer For Breaching 'NOVA' Trademark Injunction
The Bombay High Court has imposed more than ₹82 lakh in costs on the proprietor of a brilliantine hair cream manufacturing business after holding that he wilfully violated a 2010 injunction. The court found that he continued to market products under the 'NONI' label and the 'NOVA MINI' mark despite being restrained from using Dr. Ashok M. Bhat's registered 'NOVA' trademark and artistic work.Justice Arif S. Doctor directed Harichand Nagpal, sole proprietor of Ravi Industries, to pay ₹32.42 lakh...
Party Cannot Reopen Maintainability Of Fresh Arbitration After Challenging Earlier Award: MP High Court
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has recently held that a party cannot reopen the issue of maintainability at the stage of appointment of an arbitrator after having challenged an earlier arbitral award and after a court permitted fresh arbitration if disputes persisted. The ruling came while the court appointed a fresh arbitrator to adjudicate a dispute between MSP Infrastructures Limited and Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation Ltd. (MPRDCL). Justice Deepak Khot held that the question of...
Bombay High Court Appoints Arbitrator In GE Power-Unistar Dispute Despite Defective Section 21 Notice
The Bombay High Court on 14 July held that a defective notice invoking arbitration does not invalidate the commencement of arbitral proceedings where the arbitration agreement has been invoked and the disputes between the parties are clearly identified. Justice Arun R. Pedneker appointed former Bombay High Court Judge Justice Anuja Prabhudessai as the sole arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between Unistar Metals Private Limited and GE Power Limited under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and...
Bombay HC Restrains Use Of 'LAVIE LUXURY' Mark For Perfumes Over Similarity With Bagzone's 'LAVIE'
The Bombay High Court on 7 July 2026 granted an ex parte ad-interim injunction restraining Shweta Agrawal, a seller from using the mark “LAVIE LUXURY” for perfumes and colognes, holding that it was deceptively similar to the registered “LAVIE” family of marks owned by Bagzone Lifestyles Pvt Ltd. Justice Madhav J. Jamdar passed the order after the defendant failed to appear or file a reply despite being served and granted an additional opportunity to contest the proceedings, and appointed a...