Supreme Court & High Courts
Part-Payments Extend Limitation Period, Delhi High Court Revives Federal Bank's Recovery Suit
The Delhi High Court has revived Federal Bank's recovery suit against a borrower, holding that part-payments made by a borrower extend the limitation period and cannot be ignored while computing delay. Setting aside a Commercial Court order that had dismissed the suit as time-barred, a Bench of Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Amit Mahajan said courts must recompute the limitation from the date of the last payment if payments are made within time. “Once part-payments within limitation are admitted...
Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Use of 'Dream Freedom' Mark, Protects 'FREEDOM' Oil Brand
The Delhi High Court has temporarily restrained Dream Freedom Herbal Pvt. Ltd. from using the mark “DREAM FREEDOM” for edible oils. The Court said the company continued using the mark despite cancellation of its trademark registration, infringing the registered “FREEDOM” edible oil brand of Gemini Edibles and Fats India Ltd.Presiding over the case, Justice Jyoti Singh observed that Gemini Edibles and Fats India Ltd. (GEF India) had established a prima facie case for an injunction. The court...
Calcutta High Court Refuses To Quash LOC Against Former Elder Pharma Employee In ₹1,300 Crore SFIO Probe
The Calcutta High Court has refused to quash a Look Out Circular issued against Debanjan Hazra, a former employee of Elder Pharmaceuticals now settled in China, in connection with an SFIO probe into the alleged siphoning of Rs 1,300 crore from the company.Justice Krishna Rao delivered the judgment on February 13, 2026 while hearing a writ petition filed by Hazra challenging the LOC dated February 7, 2025. “In view of the above, this Court did not find any justification to set aside or quash the...
Madras High Court Revives 'Modern Kitchens' Trademark Scrapped Over Technicality
The Madras High Court has come to the relief of Mangaluru-based snack food manufacturer Modern Kitchens, reviving its trademark application after the Trade Marks Registrar scrapped it over an unsigned affidavit filed during the COVID-19 lockdown. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh held that the Registrar was not justified in treating the application for the mark “MODERN KITCHENS' Delite in Every Bite” as abandoned under Rule 46(2) of the Trade Mark Rules, 2017. In 2018, ACE Foods filed a trademark...
'Not Unknown to Law': Telangana High Court Upholds Reserve Price Reduction After Repeated Failed SARFAESI Auctions
The Telangana High Court has recently upheld the phased reduction of the reserve price fixed for the auction sale of a mortgaged immovable property under the SARFAESI Act and dismissed writ petitions filed by the borrower. A Division Bench of Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya and Justice Gadi Praveen Kumar affirmed the order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal and observed that “the process of marking down of the Reserve Price is not unknown to law.” The Bench examined Rule 8(5) of the...
First Appeal Pre-Deposit Sufficient: Jharkhand High Court Permits GSTAT Appeal Without Additional Deposit
The Jharkhand High Court has permitted Ranchi-based manufacturer Ashirwad Food Industries to file an appeal before the GST Appellate Tribunal without making any additional pre-deposit, noting that ₹23.85 lakh had already been deposited at the first appellate stage. A Division Bench of Chief Justice M.S. Sonak and Justice Rajesh Shankar found “substance in the contention” of the petitioner and held: “Considering the deposit of Rs.23.85 lakhs already made at the first appellate stage, we agree...
Madras High Court Orders Adjudication Of GST On Royalty Paid To State, Bars Implementation Till Supreme Court Ruling
The Madras High Court has directed GST authorities to adjudicate a show cause notice proposing to levy GST on seigniorage/royalty fee payable to the Government of Tamil Nadu but ordered that implementation of the assessment order shall remain in abeyance until the Supreme Court decides the issue. Justice C. Saravanan was hearing a petition challenging Show Cause Notice dated September 29, 2025. The notice proposes to levy GST on seigniorage/royalty fee payable to the State. The court noted...
Copy Of Arbitration Agreement Sufficient Where Original Not Available: Calcutta High Court
The Calcutta High Court on Thursday held that an application seeking reference to arbitration cannot be rejected merely because the original arbitration agreement or a certified copy is not produced, if the statutory requirements under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act are otherwise satisfied. A Single Bench of Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya set aside the orders of the trial court and the first appellate court, which had refused to refer the parties to arbitration. The court observed that...
Mere Accounting Treatment Of Spectrum As 'Asset' Does Not Bring It Within IBC Framework: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court on Friday held that mere treatment of telecom spectrum as an “intangible asset” in the financial statements of telecom service providers (TSPs) does not bring it within the sweep of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), observing that spectrum remains a natural resource held by the Union of India in public trust. “Merely because spectrum can be treated as an 'asset' on the basis of certain attributes, such as possession and usage, lease and assignment, claim and liability...
Composite GST Show Cause Notices For Multiple Financial Years Maintainable: Allahabad High Court
The Allahabad High Court has recently held that a composite show cause notice issued under Sections 73 and 74 of the GST Act covering multiple financial years is legally maintainable, rejecting the contention that adjudication proceedings must be confined to a single “tax period” or financial year. A Bench of Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Justice Indrajeet Shukla ruled that the statutory scheme expressly permits the Proper Officer to issue statements for periods beyond those mentioned in the...
Withdrawal Of Arbitrator Does Not Automatically Terminate Arbitral Proceedings: Bombay High Court
The court revived the stalled arbitration between Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles Ltd. and Ghosh Brothers Automobiles after appointing former Bombay HC Judge Justice R.Y. Ganoo (Retd.) as substitute arbitrator