Supreme Court & High Courts
Forcing Company Secretary To Continue In Service After Resignation Is 'Bonded Labour': Kerala High Court
The Kerala High Court has recently observed that financial issues or financial emergency cannot be a reason to force a Company Secretary to work for an incorporated Company against his will and without his consent. The court further observed that if the employer refuses to accept resignation of an employee, it would amount to bonded labour prohibited under Article 23 of the Constitution of India. Justice N Nagaresh allowed writ petitions filed by Greevas Job Panakkal, Company Secretary of...
LiveLawBiz Arbitration Cases Weekly Digest : February 16 - February 22, 2026
Nominal Index Asad Mueed & Ors. vs Jamia Hamdard Deemed to Be University, 2026 LLBiz SC 65Talwandi Sabo Power Ltd vs Punjab State Power Corporation, 2026 LLBiz SC 72R. Savithri Naidu v. The Cotton Corporation of India Ltd. & Anr., 2026 LLBiz SC 66Aspek Media Pvt Ltd & Ors. vs Entertainment City Ltd, 2026 LLBiz SC 68Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilisers Ltd vs Thermax Ltd, 2026 LLBiz SC 70Ansal Housing Limited v. SS Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. & Anr., 2026 LLBiz HC (DEL)...
Calcutta High Court Upholds Commercial Court Order Permitting Fresh Counterclaim After Transfer Of Suit
The Calcutta High Court has recently declined to interfere with a Commercial Court order allowing a defendant to file an additional written statement along with a counterclaim after the suit was transferred to the Commercial Court. The court held that such pleadings can be permitted with the court's leave under the Code of Civil Procedure. Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul) dismissed a civil revision filed by Batliboi Environmental Engineering Limited, observing that “the impugned order in the present...
Auction Purchasers Cannot Remove EPFO Attachment As CERSAI Registration Came After EPF Dues Accrued: Kerala High Court
The Kerala High Court has recently dismissed a writ petition filed by auction purchasers seeking removal of attachments over a property purchased in SARFAESI proceedings conducted by Federal Bank. Justice Viju Abraham held that since the bank itself could not claim statutory priority under Section 26-E of the SARFAESI Act, the auction purchasers were not entitled to seek effacement of the EPFO attachment. The court noted that priority under Section 26-E arises only upon registration of...
Delhi High Court Sets Aside Copyright Refusal After Registrar Equated 'Person Aggrieved' With 'Person Interested'
The Delhi High Court has set aside an order refusing copyright registration to Fornnax Technology Private Limited for its artistic work titled “Cutting Chamber Part of Secondary Shredder R-4000 Front View.” Justice Tushar Rao Gedela held that the Registrar of Copyrights had “imported the meaning ascribed to “person aggrieved” envisaged in Section 50 of the Act to be similar to or equivalent of “person interested” contemplated in Section 45(1) read with Rule 70 of the Rules; and (ii) that apart,...
Bombay High Court Allows Videography Of GST Summons Proceedings After Taxpayer Undertakes to Bear Cost
Taking note that a director of Tuesonpower International Pvt. Ltd. is undergoing treatment for cancer and has expressed willingness to cooperate with the investigation, the Bombay High Court permitted videography of summons proceedings under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. It also allowed his advocate to remain present at a visible but not audible distance during recording of the statement. The Court clarified that the relief is confined to the facts of the case,...
Objection To Arbitral Tribunal's Constitution Cannot Be Raised After Filing Defence: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad has dismissed the State of Maharashtra's challenge to an arbitral award of Rs. 596.60 lakhs, holding that objections to the constitution of the arbitral tribunal cannot be raised after filing of the written statement, counter-claim and commencement of evidence.A Division Bench of Justices Arun R. Pedneker and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav on February 16, 2026, upheld the Commercial Court's May 6, 2022, order refusing to set aside the award dated February 11, 2018. ...
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Quashing ₹2.27 Crore RERA Penalty
The Supreme Court has recently set aside a Madhya Pradesh High Court order that had quashed a Rs. 2.27 crore penalty imposed by the Madhya Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MPRERA) on an industrial project developer for non-registration of its project. A bench of Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice Alok Aradhe held that “the approach adopted by the High Court is impermissible in law.” The court noted that the High Court was exercising judicial review in the context of...
Khamosh! Bombay High Court Protects Shatrughan Sinha's Catchphrase, Personality Rights
The Bombay High Court has granted an ex parte ad-interim injunction to veteran actor and politician Shatrughan Sinha, restraining the unauthorised commercial exploitation of his personality rights. The Court also restrained use of his signature catchphrase “Khamosh” and his distinctive vocal mannerisms, observing that the expression, delivered in his unique and distinct style, is associated exclusively with his persona.Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh on February 16, 2026, stated that Sinha's name,...
Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere With Denial Of Anticipatory Bail To Chartered Accountant In PMLA Case
The Supreme Court recently refused to interfere with the Delhi High Court's order denying anticipatory bail to chartered accountant Bhaskar Yadav in a Rs. 640 crore money laundering case linked to fraudulent investment and part-time job schemes.“We do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court,” a Bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and Augustine George Masih observed while dismissing Yadav's special leave petition. The court, however, granted Yadav 10 days'...
Delhi High Court Dismisses Plea Against SEBI NOC for NSE IPO, Says Remedy Lies Before SAT
The Delhi High Court has recently dismissed a plea challenging the No Objection Certificate granted by SEBI to the National Stock Exchange in relation to its proposed Initial Public Offering. Justice Jasmeet Singh observed that the petition appeared to have been filed only to stall the IPO. “I am of the view that the present petition seems to have been filed only to interdict the IPO of respondent No. 2,” the Court held. The plea was filed by retail investor K.C. Aggarwal, who stated that he...