Madras High Court Grants Injunction Against Piracy Of Vijay Deverakonda's Ranaballi

The Madras High Court on Thursday granted an interim injunction to Mythri Movie Makers, producer of Ranaballi, to restrain the illegal recording, reproduction, and distribution of the film, which is being released in theatres today, October 16, 2026.The Telugu-language period action drama stars Vijay Deverakonda and Rashmika Mandanna.Justice P.B. Balaji passed the order on October 15, after the producer approached the court apprehending that the film could be illegally recorded and...

Central Sales Tax | Form H Must Be Filed By Time Of Assessment To Claim Tax Benefit: Andhra Pradesh High Court

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has recently held that dealers must submit Form H declarations by the time of assessment by the first assessing authority to claim a tax benefit on the last sale of goods preceding an export.The Full Bench clarified that the extended filing period available for Forms C and F under the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules, 1957, does not apply to Form H declarations.A three-judge Bench of Justice Battu Devanand, Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam and...

Actor Kriti Sanon Moves Delhi High Court To Protect Her Personality Rights

Actor Kriti Sanon has approached the Delhi High Court seeking protection of her personality rights. At the outset, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav asked Sanon's counsel, Advocate Pravin Anand, to explain what personality rights protect. Anand submitted that these rights cover aspects of an individual's identity, including their image and voice. The Court asked Anand to assist it in taking a “comprehensive and holistic” view of the subject by submitting a compilation of relevant judgments and...

Supreme Court Refuses To Direct IDBI Bank To Honour ₹8.7 Crore Bank Guarantee To CTUIL

The Supreme Court on Friday refused to interfere with the Delhi High Court's division bench order declining to direct IDBI Bank Limited to release ₹8.7 crore to the Central Transmission Utility of India Limited (CTUIL) under a bank guarantee.The Delhi High Court on July 1, 2026 dismissed an appeal filed by Central Transmission Utility of India Limited (CTUIL) challenging a Single Judge's order dated March 19, 2026, which declined to direct IDBI Bank Limited to release ₹8.7 crore under a bank...

RERA| Brochure Clause Allowing 20% Deduction On Refund Without Interest Is Unfair: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court at Lucknow has recently held that a clause in a development authority's brochure permitting it to deduct 20% of the registration amount and return the balance without interest where an allottee withdraws after allotment is a one-sided, unfair, and unreasonable term of the contract. It held that the Lucknow Development Authority was not entitled to the benefit of such a clause. Clause 8.2 of the brochure of the Lucknow Development Authority provided that...

Delhi High Court Grants Bail To Former RCOM Executive In Alleged ₹149.77 Crore Money Laundering Case

The Delhi High Court on Thursday granted regular bail to former Reliance Communications (RCOM) executive Punit Narendra Garg in a money laundering case involving alleged diversion of loan funds used to acquire a yacht and an overseas apartment. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has alleged that transactions involving these assets and payments towards his daughters' educational expenses generated proceeds of crime worth approximately ₹149.77 crore.Justice Sanjeev Narula held that Garg's...

Yes Bank's ₹8,415 Crore AT-1 Bond Write-Down After Reconstruction Scheme Took Effect Was Illegal: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Thursday held that the Administrator of Yes Bank could not write down ₹8,415 crore worth of Additional Tier-1 (AT-1) bonds after the bank's reconstruction scheme came into force. The court ruled that the requirement to write down the bonds “before reconstitution” meant before the scheme took effect. “Had the intention been otherwise, the clause ought to have read 'before reconstitution is complete',” a bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih observed. It...

Time Spent In Writ Petition Not Automatically Excluded From GST Appeal Limitation: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has clarified that the time spent pursuing a writ petition cannot be automatically excluded while computing the limitation period for filing a statutory appeal against a GST adjudication order.The Division Bench of Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Bharat Parashar observed that if an assessee files an application under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking exclusion of the period during which the writ petition remained pending, the Appellate Authority must consider the...

Delhi High Court Calls Taxpayer's Absence From Cross-Examination Despite 10-Day Notice “Indolent And Negligent”

The Delhi High Court has observed that an assessee's failure to remain available for cross-examination of a witness despite receiving at least 10 days' prior notice reflects an indolent and negligent approach towards the proceedings.The Division Bench of Justices Dinesh Mehta and Aditi Choudhary made the observation while setting aside an income tax assessment order passed against Petitioner and directing the Assessing Officer to provide a fresh opportunity to cross-examine two witnesses.The...

Madras High Court Closes Aamir Khan Productions' Copyright Suit Over “Batwara 1947” After Withdrawal

The Madras High Court has dismissed as withdrawn a copyright suit filed by Aamir Khan Productions Pvt Ltd to protect its film “Batwara 1947” from piracy.Justice P.B. Balaji recorded the withdrawal on October 13, 2026.The production house had sued 33 defendants. These included telecom operators and internet service providers such as Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Bharti Airtel, Reliance Jio Infocomm and Vodafone India, as well as several local cable operators. It sought a permanent injunction...

Profitable Companies Can Face Insolvency Proceedings If They Default On Loans: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Thursday held that a company's profitability does not prevent insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). A financial default, rather than commercial or balance-sheet insolvency, triggers the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).“Profitability is neither legally relevant to, nor economically probative of, the capacity to service debt. The Code proceeds upon the principle of timely intervention rather than terminal insolvency, and adopts...

Delhi High Court Quashes Income Tax Penalty Order Passed During Pendency Of ITAT Appeal

The Delhi High Court has quashed an income tax penalty order passed against a private company under Section 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, during the pendency of the company's appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).The Division Bench of Justices Dinesh Mehta and Aditi Choudhary held that Section 275(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act mandates that penalty proceedings remain in abeyance when an appeal against the relevant assessment order is pending before the ITAT.The Court allowed...