Supreme Court & High Courts
Calcutta High Court Says Parties Can't Object To Kolkata Arbitration Venue After Failing To Do So Earlier
The Calcutta High Court has held, in the facts of a loan dispute, that borrowers who failed to object to the choice of arbitration venue despite notice and participated in earlier proceedings before Kolkata courts could not later challenge jurisdiction, as their conduct amounted to consent. A Single Bench of Justice Shampa Sarkar allowed an application filed by Electronica Finance Limited and appointed advocate Deepan Kumar Sarkar as the sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes with Quality...
Bombay HC Permits Grasim, UltraTech To Submit Additional Evidence In 'BIRLA' Trademark Dispute With Saboo Tor
The Bombay High Court has allowed Grasim Industries and UltraTech Cement to place additional evidence on record in their trademark dispute with Saboo Tor Pvt Ltd over the use of the word “BIRLA”. The court said the documents are relevant for deciding the appeal and could not be produced earlier despite due diligence. A division bench of Justices Bharati Dangre and Manjusha Deshpande passed the order while hearing an appeal against the refusal to grant an interim injunction. The earlier decision...
Part Payments Cannot Halt SARFAESI Proceedings Once Initiated Even If Dues Fall Below 20%: Bombay HC
The Bombay High Court has recently clarified that the 20% benchmark under the SARFAESI framework operates at the threshold stage, and once that requirement is satisfied and action is initiated, subsequent payments by the borrower do not affect the creditor's right to continue enforcement. “A proper reading of Section 31(j) of Securitisation Act makes it clear that the moment the amount due exceeds 20% of the principal amount and interest thereon, the secured creditor like the respondent No.1...
Bombay High Court Upholds ₹27.43 Crore Arbitral Award Against ONGC In Uran ETP Dispute, Dismisses Appeal
The Bombay High Court has recently upheld an arbitral award in favour of Newton Engineering & Chemicals Ltd, dismissing Oil and Natural Gas Corporation's appeal in a dispute arising from delays in the Uran Effluent Treatment Plant project. A Division Bench of Chief Justice Shree Chandrashekhar and Justice Gautam A. Ankhad held that the tribunal's interpretation of the contract was a plausible view and did not warrant interference. “We do not find any contradiction in the Award or the...
Pre-2022 Iron Ore Exports Cannot Be Reassessed On DMT Basis; WMT Applies: Orissa High Court
The Orissa High Court has held that iron ore exports made before the 2022 change in law must be assessed on Wet Metric Tonne (WMT) basis prevailing at the time, and cannot later be reassessed on Dry Metric Tonne (DMT) basis. The court held, “It is trite that under all taxing statutes to consider levy of tax/duty it is to be determined when exactly did the taxable event occur? It is with reference to that point of time, that the chargeability or leviability of the tax or duty, as the case may...
Lease Termination, Eviction During IBC Moratorium Of Gujarat Hydrocarbons And Power SEZ Invalid: Gujarat HC
The Gujarat High Court has dismissed an appeal by Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation and upheld the quashing of its decision to terminate a lease and evict Gujarat Hydrocarbons and Power SEZ Ltd during insolvency proceedings. The court held that both the termination of the lease and the eviction action were “non est, illegal and bad in law” as they were taken during the moratorium period. “Given the object of Section 14(1) of the IBC' 2016, in the facts of the present case, neither the...
Arbitral Tribunal's Mandate Not Automatically Terminated After Deadline: J&K & Ladakh High Court
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh has reiterated that an arbitral tribunal does not permanently lose its authority merely because the deadline to pass an award has expired, holding that proceedings can continue if the Court later extends the time. A Bench of Justice Sanjay Dhar relying on the Supreme Court's ruling in Rohan Builders (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Berger Paints India Ltd. observed: "it is clear that expiry of stipulated time period for making award only makes the Arbitral...
Supreme Court Continues Symbolic Possession Of Tower-5 By RP In Morpheus Bluebell CIRP
The Supreme Court of India has directed that the interim arrangement permitting only symbolic possession of Tower-5 by the Resolution Professional of the Morpheus Bluebell project developed by Morpheus Prodevelopers Pvt Ltd shall continue. The company is undergoing the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) in the Morpheus Bluebell project. The Court was hearing an appeal filed by SGN Universal Construction Company Private Limited against the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's...
In Faceless Assessment, Income Tax Revision Cannot Be Decided Without Inquiry: Gauhati High Court
The Gauhati High Court has held that the revisional authority cannot dispose of revision proceedings in a mechanical manner under the Income Tax Act (Section 264), which allows a taxpayer to seek revision of an order through a faceless process without making, or causing, an enquiry. This is especially so where the assessee claims difficulty in producing voluminous records and seeks verification at the place of business. The court referred to an earlier Division Bench ruling that held that...
Madras High Court Protects Ayushmann Khurrana Starrer 'Pati Patni Aur Woh Do' From Apprehended Piracy
The Madras High Court recently protected Ayushmann Khurrana and Sara Ali Khan's Pati Patni Aur Woh Do from apprehended unauthorised broadcast by granting an ad interim injunction in favour of its producer. Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy restrained internet service providers and cable TV operators from facilitating the unlawful broadcast of the film, which is slated for release on May 15, 2026. The court noted that “irreversible injury will occur, unless unlawful broadcast is prevented.” ...
Madras High Court Protects “Krishnavataram Part 1: The Heart” From Piracy Ahead of Release
The Madras High Court has protected the upcoming Hindi film “Krishnavataram Part 1: The Heart (Hridayam)” from apprehended piracy, observing that failure to prevent unlawful broadcast could result in “irreversible injury.” In an order dated April 30, 2026, Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy granted interim injunctions against internet service providers and cable TV operators arrayed as respondents in a suit filed by Creativeland Studios Entertainment LLP. The court observed that the film is...
Is India–UK DTAA Benefit Available On Dividend Distribution Tax? Bombay High Court Refers Issue To Larger Bench
The Bombay High Court has referred to a larger bench the question of whether companies paying Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) can claim the benefit of lower tax rates under the India–UK tax treaty. The court was hearing appeals filed by Foseco India Ltd. challenging the denial of a refund of excess income tax paid. The issue, though arising in the context of the India–UK tax treaty, could also affect how similar provisions in other tax treaties are applied. A Division Bench of Justices G.S....











