Supreme Court & High Courts
Bombay High Court Cautions Against Injunctions On Third Parties In Arbitration Cases
The Bombay High Court has dismissed a plea seeking interim relief pending arbitration by Messe Frankfurt Trade Fairs India Pvt. Ltd, he Indian arm of German exhibition organiser Messe Frankfurt, seeking interim relief to stop two trade exhibitions in Mumbai, reiterating that courts must be cautious while granting orders directly against third parties under the arbitration law.Justice Sandeep V Marne said that while there is no absolute bar on granting interim relief against non-signatories, such...
Bombay High Court Sets Aside GST Notices Issued For Multiple Financial Years Together
The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has set aside two GST show cause notices issued to AR Traders after finding that the tax department had wrongly combined multiple financial years into single proceedings. A Division Bench of Jutsices Anil L. Pansare and Nivedita P. Mehta held that the GST law does not permit consolidation of multiple financial years in a single proceeding. The court said the notices issued to the firm did not follow the statutory framework governing tax...
RERA Tribunal Order Unsustainable Where Heard by One Bench And Pronounced By Another: Allahabad High Court
The Allahabad High Court has set aside a judgment of the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, holding that a case heard by one bench cannot be decided by another bench if one of its members did not hear the arguments. The court said such a judgment is unsustainable in law and goes against fundamental principles of judicial procedure. A Single Bench of Justice Subhash Vidyarthi said that the bench that hears a matter must also decide it. It added that views of members who heard the case...
Calcutta High Court Upholds ITAT Order Allowing NBFC To Set Off Share Trading Losses Against Interest Income
The Calcutta High Court has dismissed the income tax department's appeal against an ITAT order allowing an NBFC to set off losses described by the department as penny stock trades against its interest and other income. The Court held that the case raised no substantial question of law. A Division Bench of Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj and Justice Uday Kumar said the department had failed to produce any direct or substantial evidence to support its case. It found that the allegation that the...
Orissa High Court Quashes ₹8.62-Crore Ex-Parte GST Demand Against Jindal Steel
The Orissa High Court has set aside an ex-parte GST demand raised against Jindal Steel Limited, holding that mere uploading of notices under the “Additional Notices/Orders” tab on the GST portal does not constitute valid service and violates principles of natural justice.A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Harish Tandon and Justice Murahari Sri Raman found that the taxpayer was deprived of a meaningful opportunity to participate in the proceedings before the State Tax Officer.The court...
Interest For Delayed Possession Under RERA Can't Be Waived Through Private Settlement: Allahabad High Court
The Allahabad High Court has recently held that a private settlement between a promoter and a homebuyer cannot override mandatory statutory obligations under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Dismissing an appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority, a single bench of Justice Prashant Kumar upheld an order directing payment of statutory interest to a buyer for delay in handing over possession of a flat.The court said the law leaves no scope for promoters to avoid...
MP High Court Asks GST Fraud Accused To Share Google Map Location With Investigators As Bail Condition
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has granted anticipatory bail to an accused in a GST fraud case but with a strict condition. The court has ordered him to share his location with investigators by dropping a Google Map pin, warning that any breach would cancel the protection. Justice Sandeep N. Bhatt passed the order on January 15, 2026, while allowing the anticipatory bail plea filed by Dheeraj Gupta. The Court said custodial interrogation was not warranted at this stage and observed that...
Supreme Court Upholds Gujarat High Court Order Quashing Adani Power's Income Tax Reassessment Notice
The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with a 2024 Gujarat High Court ruling that quashed a reassessment notice issued to Adani Power Limited for the 2014–15 assessment year. A bench led by the Chief Justice of India, Surya Kant, and comprising Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M. Pancholi said the High Court's view “warrants no interference at all.” The court declined to condone a delay of 426 days in filing the petition. It said the explanation offered by the tax department was...
Delhi High Court Upholds Modified Arbitral Award In Prasar Bharati Cricket Broadcast Dispute With Overseas Marketer
The Delhi High Court has dismissed cross-appeals by Prasar Bharati and Stracon India Ltd, an overseas sports marketing company, upholding a single judge's ruling that only seven days of international cricket were missing under their BCCI broadcast marketing contract, and not seventeen as awarded by the arbitrator. A Division Bench of Justice Navin Chawla and Justice Madhu Jain agreed with the Single Judge that the arbitrator had wrongly excluded a 10-day India–Australia–New Zealand Triangular...
Delhi High Court Revives ITC's Challenge To Philip Morris's Non-Tobacco Nicotine Patent
The Delhi High Court has revived ITC Limited's challenge to a Philip Morris patent covering a non-tobacco nicotine product after setting aside a 2024 Patent Office order that had rejected ITC's opposition.In a judgment dated January 12, 2026, Justice Jyoti Singh allowed an appeal filed by ITC, holding that the impugned order suffered from a lack of independent application of mind and was largely a verbatim reproduction of the patentee's submissions and the recommendations of the Opposition...
Delhi High Court Orders Perjury Complaint Against Walmark Officials In Fortis Arbitration Case
The Delhi High Court has directed its Registrar General to lodge a criminal complaint for perjury against two officials of Walmark Holdings Limited for making false statements and swearing affidavits before the court in an arbitration-related dispute with Fortis Healthcare Limited. The court held that this was a fit case to invoke its powers under the Criminal Procedure Code for making false statements and swearing affidavits. “I am of the prima facie view that a fit case has been made out on...
Commercial Court Cannot Dismiss Non-Commercial Suit; Must Return Plaintiff: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court has held that when a commercial court finds that a dispute does not qualify as a “commercial dispute” under the Commercial Courts Act, it cannot dismiss the suit on that ground and must instead return the plaint so that the litigant can approach the appropriate civil court. A Division Bench of Justice Anil Kshetarpal and Justice Amit Mahajan set aside a Commercial Court order that had dismissed a recovery suit filed by former employee Pramod Kumar against Gannon...











