Bombay High Court Quashes Centre's Retrospective One-Time Spectrum Charge On Airtel, Vodafone Idea

The Bombay High Court on Monday quashed the Centre's decision imposing one-time spectrum charges retrospectively on Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea under the National Telecom Policy, 1999 (NTP-99) regime. The court held that the Union Government lacked authority under Section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, or the telecom licence agreements to levy such charges for spectrum held beyond 6.2 MHz from July 2008 onwards. A Division Bench of Justices Manish Pitale and Shriram V. Shirsat held...

Unauthenticated Alteration In Cheque Date Renders It Void: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has recently held that an alteration in the date of a cheque that is not authenticated by the drawer's full signature amounts to a material alteration and renders the cheque void, while upholding an acquittal in a cheque dishonour case. Justice A. Badharudeen held: “When there is alteration of the date in the cheque which is not authenticated by putting the full signature of the drawer on the place of alteration, the same operates as a material alteration and the same...

Cheque Dishonour Notice Must Specify Amount Demanded, Else No Valid Notice In Eye Of Law: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has held that a statutory demand notice issued in a cheque dishonour case must specifically mention the amount demanded, failing which there would be no legal notice in the eye of law. “Only when the notice is specific about the amount, it is possible for the recipient of the notice to pay the amount which was specifically asked for to avoid penal consequences,” the Court observed. Justice A Badharudeen made the observation while dismissing an appeal filed against the...

"Extremely Despicable": Bombay HC Orders Police Action Over Assault On Receiver During Counterfeit Goods Raid

The Bombay High Court has directed the Superintendent of Police, Ambala, to take action in relation to the assault on a court-appointed receiver during a court-ordered search-and-seizure operation in Haryana that allegedly uncovered a huge quantity of goods bearing Unilever Plc's trademarks, labels, and artwork. The court has also ordered police protection for the receiver during further execution proceedings. The order was passed on May 29 by vacation judge Justice Shreeram V. Shirsat. The...

Crypto Fraud Allegations Disclose Triable Issues, No Quashing At FIR Stage: Orissa High Court

The Orissa High Court on 15 May declined to quash criminal proceedings arising out of an alleged cryptocurrency investment scam, holding that allegations of false representations, fictitious entities, and dishonest inducement of investors disclose triable issues that require examination at trial rather than interference at the FIR stage. A Bench of Dr Justice Sanjeeb K Panigrahi observed: “Allegations involving organized financial fraud, systematic inducement of multiple investors, and...

Saket Court Rejects Jagran Prakashan's Trademark Claim Over “JAGRAN”, Imposes ₹10 Lakh Costs

The Saket District Court at New Delhi, on 25 May dismissed Jagran Prakashan Limited's trademark infringement and passed off suit against agricultural magazine Krishi Jagran, holding that a proprietor cannot monopolise a commonly used word through trademark registration when another party has established prior and continuous use. District Judge Arul Varma vacated the injunction order dated 29 September 2020, and imposed costs of Rs. 10 lakhs on Jagran Prakashan for dragging the defendants into...

Office-Bearers Can Face NI Act Prosecution If Complaint Shows Their Role In Transaction: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Tuesday held that criminal liability for cheque dishonour cannot be fastened on a person merely because they hold an office in a society, while making it clear that proceedings cannot be quashed at the threshold where the complaint discloses sufficient factual material linking them to the underlying transaction. A Bench of Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Justice N.V. Anjaria partly allowed an appeal filed by Mansi Finance (Chennai) Ltd against a Madras High Court order...

Karnataka HC Directs Takedown Of AI-Morphed Content Depicting Dharmasthala Dharmadhikari Veerendra Heggade, Family

The Karnataka High Court has directed the State of Karnataka and the Bengaluru CEN Police Station to take immediate steps to ensure removal of AI-generated, morphed, manipulated, and fabricated images and video content depicting Dr. D. Veerendra Heggade, the Dharmadhikari of Sri Kshetra Dharmasthala, and his family members. The content is to be removed from all social media platforms, URLs, and press and media platforms within one week from receipt of a copy of the order. Justice S.R. Krishna...

'Security Cheque' Not Statutorily Defined, Not Exempt From Cheque Bounce Proceedings: Himachal Pradesh HC

The Himachal Pradesh High Court has refused to quash cheque dishonour proceedings at the threshold in a case where the accused claimed the dishonoured cheque had been issued only as security. Justice Sandeep Sharma said a cheque described as a “security cheque” is not automatically excluded from cheque dishonour proceedings. “Needless to say, expression “Security Cheque” is not a statutorily defined expression in the Negotiable Instruments Act, rather same is to be inferred from the pleadings...

Is ChatGPT An Intermediary Under IT Act? Calcutta High Court Prima Facie Says No

The Calcutta High Court has, in a case examining how generative AI platforms fit within the Information Technology Act, prima facie held that ChatGPT ought to be treated as an “originator” rather than an “intermediary.” The observations came in IndiaMart InterMesh Ltd's suit against OpenAI, where the classification of ChatGPT became central after the B2B platform argued that the AI tool was omitting links to IndiaMart in response to certain user queries while allegedly providing links for rival...

Supreme Court Refuses To Vacate Stay On FIR Against WinZO, Director Over Alleged BOT Use To Defeat Players

The Supreme Court on Monday (May 18) refused to interfere with the Punjab and Haryana High Court's order staying further proceedings in an FIR against WinZO Pvt Ltd and its director over allegations that the gaming platform used “BOTs” to cheat users. It requested the High Court to endeavour to decide the matter by June 15, 2026. A Bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh said there was force in the submission that courts ordinarily should not stall investigations....

Calcutta High Court Dismisses Challenge To IOCL's Revocation Of LPG Distributorship Reconstitution Approval

The Calcutta High Court has dismissed a challenge to Indian Oil Corporation Limited's decision revoking in-principle approval for reconstitution of an LPG distributorship from proprietorship to partnership, holding that the reconstitution process had not attained finality as the revised distributorship agreement remained unexecuted. Justice Smita Das De observed that while judicial review remained available against arbitrary State action, the court's role in the present dispute was limited. ...