High Courts
Delhi High Court Bars Another Company from Using Ching's 'Schezwan Chutney' Mark
In yet another order granting relief to Ching's Secret sauces maker Capital Foods Pvt. Ltd., the Delhi High Court has once again stepped in to protect the company's trademark “Schezwan Chutney.”Earlier this week, on November 3, 2025, the Court had restrained a Uttar Pradesh-based food manufacturer from using the name “Schezwan Tufani Chutney” or any expression deceptively similar to “Schezwan Chutney.” Now, in a second such order within days, the Court has granted an ad-interim injunction...
Delhi High Court Restrains Pharma Firm from Using Marks Similar To Mankind Pharma's 'Kind' Brand
The Delhi High Court has recently restrained De Harbien Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., a pharmaceutical company, from using the marks “NEFROKIND” and “SILOKIND.” The Court found these marks deceptively similar to Mankind Pharma Limited's well-known trademarks “MANKIND,” “KIND,” and other “KIND” formative marks.A Single Bench of Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora passed the ex-parte ad-interim injunction on November 7, 2025, in a case filed by Mankind Pharma. The company had sought protection for its...
Delhi High Court Blocks 26 Websites From Streaming Italy's 'Serie A' Football Matches Illegally, Grants Dynamic Injunction To DAZN
The Delhi High Court has restrained 26 websites from illegally streaming live matches of the ongoing 'Serie A Championship', after finding that they were broadcasting the content without authorization from DAZN Limited which is the exclusive rights holder of the sporting event. Justice Tejas Karia passed the order on November 6, 2025, in a suit filed by DAZN Limited seeking urgent protection of their exclusive broadcast and digital streaming rights. DAZN Limited holds exclusive...
Punjab & Haryana High Court Stays Injunction Against Radico Khaitan In 'Kashmyr'-'Cashmir' Trademark Dispute Over Deceptive Similarity
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has stayed an order of the Commercial Court, Karnal which had restrained Radico Khaitan Ltd. from using the mark “Kashmyr” for its liquor products following a trademark suit initiated by Picadilly Agro Industries Ltd., proprietor of the marks “Cashmir” and “Cashmere.” A Division Bench comprising Justice Ashwani Kumar Mishra and Justice Rohit Kapoor passed the order on October 9, 2025 while hearing an appeal filed by Radico Khaitan against the...
Delhi High Court Refers EBC–Rupa Trademark Dispute on Constitution Pocket Edition To Mediation
The Delhi High Court has recently referred a trademark dispute between EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd. and Rupa Publications India Pvt. Ltd. to mediation before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The dispute concerns the alleged deceptive similarity between the publishers' coat-pocket editions of the Constitution of India. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora passed the order on November 6, 2025, while hearing Rupa Publications' plea to vacate the ex-parte injunction earlier granted...
District Court Can Hear Design Infringement Cases Unless Cancellation Is Sought : Rajasthan High Court
The Rajasthan High Court has recently held that District Courts are empowered to hear design infringement cases unless the opposing party formally seeks cancellation of the registered designs. The bench at Jaipur made this ruling while setting aside the transfer of three such cases filed by Jaipur-based carpet exporter S.N. Kapoor Export against Saraswati Global Ltd., another trader from the city.A Single Bench of Justice Sudesh Bansal delivered the judgment on October 9, 2025, clarifying that...
Madras High Court Strikes Down 'Original Choice' Trademark, Rules in Favor of 'Officer's Choice'
The Madras High Court on Friday ruled in favour of Allied Blenders and Distillers Pvt. Ltd. (ABD), the maker of Officer's Choice whisky, and ordered the removal of John Distillers Ltd.'s (JDL) 'Original Choice' trademark from the register of trademarks. A Division Bench of Justice G Jayachandran and Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar in an order held that Original Choice was deceptively similar to Officer's Choice and that its registration violated the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The Court also...
Delhi Court Restrains Surat Trader From Copying Garnier's Vitamin C Serum Packaging
A Delhi Commercial Court has restrained a Surat-based trader from using packaging and trade dress similar to L'Oréal's cosmetic and personal care brand Garnier for its “Bright Complete Vitamin C Booster Serum.” The court held that the imitation amounted to trademark infringement and passing off. The order was passed on October 29 by District Judge Savita Rao of the Commercial Court, Saket, in a suit filed by L'Oréal S.A. The company sought protection for its “Garnier Bright Complete” mark and...
Delhi High Court Stays Order Directing Transfer Of 'Bima Sugam' Domain Names
The Delhi High Court has stayed a Single Judge's order that had directed the transfer of the domain names www.bimasugam.com and www.bimasugam.in to the Bima Sugam India Federation, pending the outcome of a trademark dispute with A. Range Gowda, a private individual and insurance agent.A Division Bench comprising Justice C Hari Shankar and Justice Om Prakash Shukla passed the interim order on October 30, 2025, in an appeal filed by Gowda challenging the Single Judge's order dated October...
Delhi Court Permanently Restrains Bengaluru Restaurant From Using 'Carnatic' Mark In Suit By Delhi-Based Carnatic Cafe
A Commercial Court in Delhi has permanently restrained Bengaluru-based restaurant from using the mark “CARNATIC” or any deceptively similar name to “CARNATIC CAFÉ”, a Delhi-based South Indian restaurant chain, holding that their adoption of the mark amounted to infringement and passing off. The order was passed on October 29, 2025 by District Judge Neelam Singh of the Commercial Court, Saket Courts in a suit filed by proprietor of the Carnatic Café. Carnatic Café, engaged in...
Delhi High Court Allows 'Gulshan-e-Karim' To Use Name With Disclaimer In 'Karim's' Trademark Dispute, Calls It Innocent Infringment
The Delhi High Court on Thursday ruled that while the marks “Karim's” and “Gulshan-e-Karim” are similar, a complete ban on the latter's use would be excessive. The Court has allowed a Moradabad-based restaurant to continue using its name, provided it clearly states that it has no connection with the iconic Karim's chain in Delhi. A Division Bench of Justice C Hari Shankar and Justice Ajay Digpaul modified an earlier injunction by the Commercial Court at Tis Hazari, which had barred the...
Delhi High Court Restrains Beauty Salon From Infringing Lotus Herbals' Mark
The Delhi High Court has restrained a beauty salon from using the name “Lotus Salon” or any mark deceptively similar to Lotus, a popular personal care and cosmetics brand, observing that there was prima facie evidence of trademark infringement and passing off.A single bench of Justice Tejas Karia passed the interim order on November 3 in a suit filed by Lotus Herbals Pvt. Ltd., which sought permanent injunctions against the salon.Founded in 1993, Lotus Herbals operates salons and professional...












