Required Percentage For Passing Resolution Must Be Calculated Based On Voting Shares Of All Creditors, Not Just Those Present & Voting: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Barun Mitra (Technical Member) has held that the required percentage of 66% as mandated under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) for passing a resolution by the Committee of Creditors cannot be counted merely based on voting shares of the creditors who are present and voting but voting shares of the all the creditors including absentees must be counted. The present two...

No Direction Pertaining To Fees & Expenses Of Resolution Professional Can Be Passed Prior To Adjudication Of S.99 Report: NCLT Delhi

The National Company Law Tribunal Delhi allowed applications filed by the Central Bank of India seeking replacement of Resolution Professional for failure of submission of report as per section 99 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and demanding fees before adjudication of the report. The bench of Shri Manni Sankariah Shanmuga Sundaram and Shri Atul Chaturvedi held that “any directions pertaining to the fees and expenses of the resolution professional, prior to adjudication...

Sale Of Corporate Debtor's Assets Can't Be Allowed At Reserve Price Reduced Beyond 25% As It Violates Liquidation Regulations: NCLT Bengaluru

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Bengaluru Bench of Shri. Sunil Kumar Aggarwal (Judicial Member) and Shri. Radhakrishna Sreepada (Technical Member) has held that the sale of the Corporate Debtor's assets cannot be allowed at a reserve price reduced beyond the 25% threshold, as it would violate Schedule I of the Liquidation Regulations. This cannot be done by the Adjudicating Authority even by exercising its powers under section 60(5) of the IBC as it would amount to creating a...

Changing Incorrect Date Of Default Is Permitted Before Final Adjudication If No New Cause Of Action Is Raised By Such Amendment: NCLT Amravati

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Amravati Bench of Shri Umesh Kumar Shukla (Technical Member) and Shri Kishore Vemulapalli (Judicial Member) held that a change in the incorrect date of default mentioned in the original petition can be allowed before final adjudication, provided it does not introduce a new cause of action and no prejudice is caused to the corporate debtor by such an amendment. The present application has been filed under section 60(5) of the Insolvency and...

After Initiation Of CIRP, There Can Be No Encumbrances On Corporate Debtor's Assets: NCLT Chennai

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chennai Bench of Sanjiv Jain (Judicial Member) Shri. Ravichandran Ramasamy (Technical Member) has held that after the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), there can be no encumbrances on the assets of the corporate debtor, and all claims must be dealt with in accordance with Section 53 of the IBC. The present application has been filed under section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) seeking ...

Sale Of Corporate Debtor's Property Can't Be Declared Fraudulent Merely On Claim Of Security Interest Without Supporting Evidence: NCLT Kochi

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Kochi Bench of Shri. Vinay Goel (Judicial Member) and Smt. Madhu Sinha (Technical Member) has held that when the property of the Corporate Debtor is purchased in good faith by a bona fide purchaser, the mere fact that the sale price was slightly lower than the actual price does not bring the transaction within the ambit of a fraudulent transaction, especially when the sale is sought to be reversed on the ground that the property was charged in...

Ex-Parte Order Is Invalid Where Company Petition Is Renumbered After Restoration Without Informing Corporate Debtor: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi Bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Barun Mitra (Technical Member) has held that when a Company Petition is restored and assigned a different number, due to which the Corporate Debtor could not access the case and present its defence effectively, an ex-parte order cannot be passed in such circumstances. The Corporate Debtor should have been informed of the renumbering so it could present its defence. This appeal has been...

In Absence Of Claims From Financial Or Operational Creditors, Liquidation Order Must Be Passed U/S 33 Of IBC: NCLT Bengaluru

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Bengaluru Bench of Shri Sunil Kumar Aggarwal (Judicial Member) and Shri Radhakrishna Sreepada (Technical Member) has held that in the absence of any claims from either financial or operational creditors, due to lack of supporting documents to prove such claims and the inability to constitute the Committee of Creditors (CoC), liquidation of the corporate debtor can be ordered under Section 33 of the IBC. The present application has been filed ...

Limitation For Filing Application Under IBC Is Three Years If No Extension Is Sought, Even If Such Application Is Filed Based On Court's Decree: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi Bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Barun Mitra (Technical Member) has held that the time period for filing an application under the IBC remains three years, even if it is based on a court decree. It is not extended merely because the limitation period for executing the decree is 12 years. The present two appeals have been filed by the IDBI Bank against orders passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Indore by...

Order Passed By NCLT President On Transfer Application Listed In Court Is Judicial Order, Appealable U/S 421 Of Companies Act: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi Bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Barun Mitra (Technical Member) has held that although the President of the NCLT exercises administrative functions such as listing and transferring cases, once a transfer application is listed before the Court, any order passed, even if by the President, becomes a judicial order, appealable under Section 421 of the Companies Act. These two Appeals have been filed against orders passed...

Claims Of Multiple Operational Creditors Arising From Different Work Orders Can't Be Clubbed Into Single Debt To Cross Threshold Limit: NCLT Chennai

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Chennai bench of Justice Sanjiv Jain (Judicial Member) and Venkataraman Subramaniam (Technical Member) has held that claims arising from different work orders cannot be clubbed to cross the threshold limit for filing an insolvency petition under section 9 of the IBC. Furthermore, claims of multiple Operational Creditors cannot be clubbed into a single debt for the purpose of a petition under section 9 of the IBC. The present petition has been...

'Hard To Believe Corporate Debtor Who Invested ₹5.5 Crore Was Unaware Of CIRP': NCLAT Refuses To Expunge Adverse Remarks Against Suspended Directors

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi bench of Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain (Judicial Member), Justice Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan (Judicial Member) and Mr. Naresh Salecha (Technical Member) has held that strong observations made against the suspended directors of the Corporate Debtor, while passing an order of dissolution due to their non-cooperation in providing requisite statutory records to the Resolution Professional or the Liquidator and their continuous...