GST Not Payable On Transfer Of Leasehold Rights: Gujarat High Court Directs Refund

The Gujarat High Court, recently relying on its earlier ruling, reiterated that transferring or assigning leasehold rights in land is equivalent to the sale of land and therefore does not constitute a taxable 'supply' under the GST frameworkA Bench of Justice A. S. Supehia and Justice Pranav Trivedi was hearing a petition filed by Aquaeva Chemtech Private Limited, which had challenged the withholding of its GST refund relating to the transfer of leasehold rights in an industrial plot. The court...

Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Rejection Of GST Appeal Over 13-Day Delay

The Gujarat High Court recently set aside an appellate order rejecting a GST appeal solely on the ground of a 13-day delay, holding that the appellate authority had failed to exercise its discretion under the law despite having the power to condone the delay. A bench of Justice A.S. Supehia and Justice Pranav Trivedi held that the delay fell within the additional 30-day condonable period available beyond the 90-day statutory limitation under Section 107(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax...

Rectification Of GST Returns Permissible Where There Is No Revenue Loss: Gujarat High Court

Earlier this month, the Gujarat High Court held that inadvertent errors in GST returns can be rectified, provided there is no loss of revenue, and directed the authorities to facilitate amendment of GSTR-01 and GSTR-3B for the initial years of GST rollout. A Division Bench comprising Justice A.S. Supehia and Justice Pranav Trivedi allowed the writ petition filed by an authorized dealer of TATA Motors, permitting rectification of monthly returns electronically or manually. The Bench referred to...

Gujarat High Court Clarifies GST Treatment Of Amalgamations, Declines IGST Refund Relief To Alstom

The Gujarat High Court on 23 January dismissed a batch of writ petitions seeking IGST refunds on exports made prior to amalgamation, while authoritatively clarifying the statutory framework governing registration, refund claims and transfer of input tax credit in cases of corporate amalgamation under the GST regime. A Division Bench of Justice A.S. Supehia and Justice Pranav Trivedi dismissed the petitions filed by Alstom Transport India Limited, holding that both the taxpayer and the...

Mere Allegations Of Fraud Don't Give Civil Courts Jurisdiction In SARFAESI Cases: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has refused to interfere with SARFAESI recovery proceedings involving State Bank of India, holding that fraud or collusion allegations alone do not give civil courts jurisdiction when a statutory remedy lies before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. Justice Niral R. Mehta said that challenges to such measures, including claims of fraud, must be raised before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT), which has wide powers under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act to examine the legality,...

Gujarat High Court Reaffirms Mandatory Draft Order In Transfer Pricing Officer Assessments

The Gujarat High Court has held that failure to issue a draft assessment order under Section 144C in cases involving Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) adjustments renders the final assessment order void. The Court emphasised that an “eligible assessee” must be issued a draft order in terms of Section 144C, including cases with TPO adjustments, and that skipping this step deprives the assessee of the statutory right to approach the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP). A Division Bench comprising Justice...

Ten-Year Limitation Bars Reopening Assessment For AY 2015-16: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court on 5 January held that a notice to reopen an assessment is barred by limitation if issued beyond ten years from the end of the relevant assessment year A Division Bench of Justice A.S. Supehia and Justice Pranav Trivedi was hearing a case which included four different but legally identical writ applications. It clarified that under Section 153A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the “relevant assessment year” must be computed backwards from the end of the search year....

How Can Trademark Registry Restrict Use Of A Mark Without Reasons, Gujarat High Court Orally Asks?

The Gujarat High Court on Friday (January 16) orally questioned the Registrar of Trademarks on why the adjudicating authority had permitted advertisement of a trademark in the Trademark Journal with restrictions, without recording any reasons for imposing such conditions. Justice Niral R. Mehta was hearing an appeal arising from a 2020 order of the trademark authority, which had conditionally accepted an application for registration of the “Family Farms” logo with the tagline “Ye Ghar Ki Baat...

GST| Tobacco In Small Retail Packs Classifiable As 'Chewing Tobacco': Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court, in a bunch of matters concerning classification of Raw Tobacco Leaves packed and sold in retail pouches, were classifiable as 'Chewing Tobacco' irrespective of whether it was scented, fermented or liquored and re-packed or re-labelled. In a recent judgment delivered by a Division Bench comprising Justice Bhargav D. Karia and Justice Pranav Trivedi, rejected the Tobacco Manufacturers stance that Tobacco without being fermented or liquored ceases to be a “Chewing...

'Lame Excuses': Gujarat High Court Refuses To Condone Delay In Filing GST Appeal On Ground Of Illness Of Accountant, Closure Of Business

The Gujarat High Court dismissed a plea challenging order of the appellate authority which had rejected the assessee's GST appeal filed belatedly, observing that it cannot quash the order in wake of the "lame excuse" given by the petitioner for condoning delay such as illness of the Accountant and closure of business.The petitioner had filed an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) challenging a 24.04.2024 order which was rejected on the ground that the same is not maintainable and time ...

S.148A Income Tax Act | Gujarat High Court Quashes Reopening Of Assessment, Says AO Conducted Roving Inquiry Despite Being Given All Details

The Gujarat High Court quashed proceedings reopening the assessment of a man whose income had allegedly escaped assessment, after noting that despite the assessee explaining all banking transaction details, the assessing officer had travelled beyond the law and conducted a roving inquiry. For context, Section 148A of the Income Tax Act pertains to conducting of inquiry by assessing officer before he issues notice to assesee in cases where income has escaped assessment. The petitioner...

Income Tax Act | Gujarat High Court Quashes S.153C Assessment As Time-Barred, Rejects Revenue's Reliance On S.153(6)(i)

The Gujarat High Court quashed assessment order as well as a demand notice issued to an entity under Section 153C Income Tax Act after noting that the assessment order was issued invoking Section 153(6)(i) was beyond the limitation period. The petitioner had moved the high court for quashing Assessment Order dated 30.04.2024 as well as the demand Notice dated 30.04.2024 for the Assessment Year 2011-12. It was contended that the assessment order passed by the respondent was clearly barred by...