Pendency Of Customs Adjudication Process Cannot Justify Provisional Attachment Beyond 12 Months: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has directed the defreezing of a bullion account belonging to a Chennai-based jewellery exporter.It held that a provisional attachment of a bank account under Section 110(5) of the Customs Act cannot continue beyond the maximum statutory period of 12 months.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar passed the order on a plea filed by Dhruv Jewellers, challenging a communication dated August 4, 2022, issued by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) to the bank directing it to...

Gauhati High Court Bars Coercive GST Recovery During Search, Directs Authorities To Follow Investigation Guidelines

The Gauhati High Court has directed GST authorities not to take coercive steps against a taxpayer for discharge of any liability during an ongoing search and directed them to adhere to the prescribed GST investigation guidelines till the returnable date.Justice Manish Choudhury passed the order while hearing a writ petition filed by Deepak Construction Co., a partnership firm having its principal place of business at Hijuguri, Tinsukia, Assam.The petitioner's principal place of business was...

“Tremendous Pressure” Not Ground: Calcutta HC Refuses To Condon 1,480-Day Income Tax Department Appeal Delay

The Calcutta High Court has refused to condone a 1,480-day delay in filing an income tax appeal, holding that the Income Tax Department cannot explain such an inordinate delay merely by pointing to its heavy workload and the number of matters it was handling.A Division Bench of Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj and Justice Sudip Deb found that the Department had not shown due diligence in pursuing the appeal. The explanation offered for the delay was not sufficient to justify condoning it.The court was...

Bona Fide Buyer Of Duty-Free Import Licence Not Liable For Exporter's Fraud: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court has recently held that a bona fide purchaser of a duty-free import licence cannot be made liable for the exporter's fraud when the purchaser had no knowledge of it.It observed that a licence obtained through fraud or misrepresentation is not automatically void or non-existent. Where the licence was genuinely issued by the competent authority and remained uncancelled, it continues to be valid until it is avoided in accordance with law."A bona fide purchaser of a duty-free...

Extending Spouse' Tax Benefit Under IT Act For Same-Sex Couple Would Indirectly Recognise Same-Sex Marriage: Centre Tells Karnataka HC

The Centre on Saturday told the Karnataka High Court that interpreting “spouse” to include same-sex partners under a provision of the Income Tax Act would indirectly recognise a same-sex matrimonial relationship, which is not recognised under Indian law.“Same-sex marriage is not a recognised marriage in the Indian context. So, if we understand spouse to mean same sex people, we indirectly recognise their matrimonial relationship. Therefore, spouse necessarily means husband and wife,” Solicitor...

Telangana High Court Upholds Injunction Against 'Namaskar Tasty Nutts' In 'Tasty Gold' Trademark Dispute

The Telangana High Court has upheld a temporary injunction restraining edible oil manufacturer Vaidehi Agro Oils from using “Namaskar Tasty Nutts”. The court found that the mark and packaging could confuse consumers into believing that the oil was linked to Sri Tulasi Industries' “Tasty Gold” brand“Most of the targeted consumers would be illiterates and semiliterates and there is every possibility that they would be easily confused to draw a distinction between the oils of the plaintiff's firm...

Trademark Owner As Director Of Applicant Company Not Enough To Seek Rival's Name Change: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High court has quashed two MCA orders directing companies run by Kandamkulathy Francis Paul to change their names after K. P. Pathrose Vaidyan's Kandamkulathy Vaidyasala Pvt. Ltd. sought rectification of their names under Section 16(1)(b) of the Companies Act.Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas held that the company seeking the name changes did not itself hold the registered “Kandamkulathy” trademark. It therefore could not maintain the applications under Section 16(1)(b) of the Companies...

Kerala High Court Directs Numbering Of Suit Over Anonymous Review Of Antony Varghese's Kattalan

The Kerala High Court has directed the Principal Munsiff court in Ernakulam to number a suit seeking removal of a review of the malayalam film Kattalan posted on BookMyShow.Justice Easwaran S. held that insisting on the physical address of an unidentified reviewer defeats the purpose of “John Doe” proceedings. “The insistence on the part of the Principal Munsiff Court, Ernakulam, to correct the physical address of 'John Doe-2nd defendant' under Order VI Rule 14A of CPC creates a procedural...

GST | Same Assessee, Overlapping Periods Not Enough To Bar DGGI Proceedings: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that proceedings initiated by State GST authorities and the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) are not barred under Section 6(2)(b) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, merely because they relate to the same assessee, overlapping financial periods, or involve Input Tax Credit (ITC).The Division Bench of Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Shail Jain observed that the statutory bar under Section 6(2)(b) is attracted only when the subsequent...

Objection To Parallel State GST, DGGI Proceedings Can Be Raised In Statutory Appeal: Delhi High Court Refuses Writ

The Delhi High Court has held that a taxpayer challenging proceedings initiated by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) on the ground that the same subject matter had already been dealt with by State GST authorities can raise the objection under Section 6(2)(b) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act), before the statutory appellate authority.The Division Bench of Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Shail Jain was dealing with a plea by challenging show cause notice...

GST | Disputed SCN Service, Personal Hearing Issues Cannot Be Raised In Writ Plea: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has declined to exercise its writ jurisdiction over pleas by two directors of Sterne India Pvt. Ltd. challenging a ₹27.11 crore GST penalty. The court held that their claims over service of the show cause notice (SCN) and denial of personal hearing involved factual issues that could be examined by the statutory appellate authority. According to the court, these grievances did not justify bypassing the remedy of appeal available under Section 107 of the Central Goods and...

GST | Proceedings Under Sections 73, 74 Can Co-Exist If They Concern Distinct Infractions: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that proceedings under Sections 73 and 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) can co-exist where they concern distinct liabilities or contraventions.The Division Bench of Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Shail Jain made the observation while dismissing a plea filed challenging proceedings initiated by the Central GST authorities under Section 74 of the CGST Act in relation to alleged inadmissible Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by...