All High Courts
Section 311 CrPC Can Be Invoked To Seek Additional Documents In Black Money Act Case: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court has recently held that courts can invoke Section 311 of the CrPC, which allows summoning or recalling evidence, to permit additional documents to be placed on record if necessary for a just decision, even in prosecution under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015.Justice Neena Bansal Krishna dismissed petitions filed by businessman Deepak Talwar challenging orders of the trial court and revisional court, which had allowed the...
Bombay High Court Orders Restoration Of GST Registration Of Bi-Chem India After Revenue Withdraws Suspension
The Bombay High Court has recently directed the Revenue to immediately restore the GST registration of Bi-Chem India Pvt. Ltd. after the department informed the court during the hearing that the suspension would be withdrawn and the registration made operational. A division bench of Justices G.S. Kulkarni and Aarti Sathe was dealing with a writ petition filed by the company questioning the suspension of its GST registration, along with a show cause notice dated February 18, 2026, a recovery...
Registrar Of Firms Cannot Refuse To Record Changes To Partnership Deed: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court at Goa has recently held that the Registrar of Firms does not have the power to refuse or withhold recording changes incorporated in a partnership deed under Section 63(1) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, holding that the Registrar's role is limited to recording such changes. A division bench of Justices Valmiki Menezes and Amit S. Jamsandekar said: “Sub-section (1) of Section 63 of the Partnership Act only empowers the Registrar to record changes in the constitution...
Kerala High Court Upholds Award Granting Compensation For Entire House Rendered Unusable By NHAI Acquisition
The Kerala High Court dismissed an appeal challenging an arbitral award granting compensation for an entire residential building affected by land acquisition for National Highway-66 development in Kasaragod, Kerala.A division bench of Chief Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Syam Kumar V.M. dismissed the appeal filed by the Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, reiterating the limited scope of interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.“The...
GST Show Cause Notice Cannot Proceed On Preconceived Conclusion Of Liability: Kerala High Court
The Kerala High Court recently set aside a Goods and Services Tax (GST) show cause notice issued to the Kerala State Self-Financing B.Pharm College Management Association after finding that the notice was worded in a manner suggesting a pre-conceived conclusion on the petitioner's liability. The court held that a show cause notice can contain only a proposal based on the material on record and that a final conclusion can be reached only after considering the assessee's objections and documents....
Time Limit Under Arbitration Act Not Applicable To National Highway Act Arbitration: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad has recently held that the time limit for making an arbitral award under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, does not apply to arbitrations conducted under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956, as the Arbitration Act applies only to the limited extent provided under Section 3G(6) and only where it is not inconsistent with the special statutory scheme.Under the provision, an award in domestic commercial arbitration needs to be...
Amendment Allowing Customs Duty Exemption For Machinery Installed In Premises Applies Retrospectively: Gujarat High Court
The Gujarat High Court has held that an amendment to a customs exemption notification under the Export Promotion Capital Goods (EPCG) scheme, which allowed installation of imported machinery in the importer's “factory or premises," will apply retrospectively, and exemption cannot be denied merely because the machinery was installed outside the factory. Allowing an importer's appeal, a Division Bench of Justice A.S. Supehia and Justice Pranav Trivedi observed that the benefit earlier denied due...
Delhi High Court Upholds Arbitral Award Allowing BSNL's 12.63 Crores Counterclaim In Optical Fibre Cable Dispute
The Delhi High Court refused to interfere with an arbitral award allowing counterclaims to BSNL amounting to Rs. 12.63 crores in a dispute arising out of supply of optical fibre cables, holding that the supplier remained bound by its assurance regarding the life of the cables A single bench of Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar observed that when the supplier had assured that the life of the cables supplied by it was 32.8 years, which was beyond the tender requirement of 20 years then it was...
Bombay High Court Injuncts Use Of 'LIVOGEM', Finds Prima Facie Infringement Of P&G's LIVOGEN Trademark
The Bombay High Court has recently granted an interim injunction in favour of Procter & Gamble Health Limited and its German affiliate, restraining the use of a rival mark found to be deceptively similar to their registered trademarks “LIVOGEN” and “LIVOGEN-Z”. On March 17, 2026, Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh held that the plaintiffs had made out a prima facie case of trademark infringement against Horizon Bioceuticals Pvt. Ltd. and Curewell Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. over their...
Delhi High Court Declines To Quash Customs SCN, Says Limitation Plea To Be Examined By Adjudicating Authority
The Delhi High Court has recently declined to exercise its writ jurisdiction to quash a show cause notice issued under the Customs Act, 1962, holding that the petitioner's plea regarding limitation must be decided by the adjudicating authority.A division bench of Justices Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Ajay Digpaul observed,“Once the petitioner has submitted his explanation on the issue of limitation based on the judgments referred above, it can be expected of the respondents to deal with the...
Himachal Pradesh High Court Stays Further Arbitration Over Construction Project At IIT Mandi
The Himachal Pradesh High Court has held that further proceedings in an ongoing arbitration concerning a construction project involving the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Mandi and the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) shall remain stayed while it examines IIT Mandi's plea to be impleaded in the dispute arising from an arbitral award of Rs 3,79,52,929. The matter was heard on March 16, 2026, by a Division Bench of Chief Justice G.S. Sandhawalia and Justice Bipin C. Negi. The dispute...