Arbitration Can Proceed Despite Parallel Criminal Proceedings In Private Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court

The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently reiterated that parallel criminal proceedings between private parties do not bar arbitration unless the allegations have a public character and proceeded to appoint an arbitrator in a dispute arising out of purchase orders between the parties. A single bench of Justice Vivek Jain emphasised, observing, “Be that as it may be, but it is settled in law that even where criminal proceedings are pending parallelly, then also arbitration proceedings can continue...

Bombay HC Flags 'Judicial Chaos,' Urges Uniform Litigation Policy Over Contradictory Stands Taken by Tax Depts

The Bombay High Court has recently flagged a persistent issue of the tax and customs department taking inconsistent stands on the same legal question before different High Courts, warning that such conduct leads to “judicial chaos” and needs correction through a uniform litigation policy. A bench of Justice G. S. Kulkarni and Justice Aarti Sathe held that once a legal issue has reached finality against the department, it cannot be reopened elsewhere by taking a contrary stand. The court...

Kerala High Court Allows Arbitration In Insurance Dispute, Says Discharge Voucher Not A Bar

The Kerala High Court has recently allowed an arbitration request filed by Coco-Latex Exports Private Limited against National Insurance Company Limited, holding that execution of a discharge voucher towards full and final settlement does not bar invocation of arbitration. “Therefore, I find that objection raised by the respondent on the basis of the discharge voucher issued by the respondent is not sustainable,” the Court said. Justice S. Manu was dealing with a plea arising out of an...

Bombay High Court Allows Delay Condonation For Charitable Trust IT Filing, Attributes Delay To CA Lapse

The Bombay High Court has set aside an order rejecting a charitable trust's request to excuse a delay in filing Form 10, holding that a lapse on the part of its Chartered Accountant could not be used to deny the trust tax exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act. A Bench of Justice B.P. Colabawalla and Justice Firdosh P. Pooniwalla said, “the Petitioner Trust would suffer grave hardship if the delay is not condoned since the Petitioner Firm would be saddled with a huge tax liability for...

Faridkot Courts, Not Bathinda, Have Jurisdiction In NH-15 Arbitration Dispute: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that courts at Faridkot would have jurisdiction to entertain challenges to arbitral awards arising out of the NH-15 Amritsar–Bathinda project, and not courts at Bathinda, as the arbitral proceedings were conducted and the awards were passed at Faridkot.A coram of Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri observed that "Although the present cases pertain to statutory arbitration but it is an admitted fact that the arbitration has been conducted at Faridkot with the...

Bombay High Court Quashes Infinx GST Refund Rejection After Hearing Adjournment Denied Despite Heavy Rains

The Bombay High Court has set aside a GST refund rejection against Infinx Services Private Limited, finding that the tax department shut the company out of the process by deciding the case without giving it a hearing, even after it asked for time citing heavy rains in Mumbai. A Bench of Justice G. S. Kulkarni and Justice Aarti Sathe held that the order had been passed without affording a personal hearing despite a specific request to reschedule the hearing on account of heavy rains in the city....

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award Against Indian Sugar Exim, Says Damages Cannot Be Based On Guesswork

The Delhi High Court has recently set aside an arbitral award passed against Indian Sugar Exim Corporation Ltd., holding that damages under Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act cannot be awarded on mere guesswork in the absence of proof of actual loss. Justice Avneesh Jhingan held that “the law is well settled that for claiming damages under Section 73 of the Contract Act, actual loss or damage suffered is to be proved and only in cases where such proof is not possible, a honest genuine...

Only Express Waiver Can Cure Arbitrator Ineligibility, Not Conduct Or Panel Appointment: Delhi High Court

On 13 April, the Delhi High Court held that an arbitral award is vitiated where the sole arbitrator is ineligible under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and clarified that such ineligibility cannot be cured by implied consent, procedural participation, or panel-based appointments unless there is an express written waiver after disputes arise. A Division Bench of Justices C. Hari Shankar and Om Prakash Shukla dismissed the appeals filed by Titagarh Rail Systems...

Taxpayer Liable Only For Own Investment Share, Not Spouse's Contribution: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court on 17 April 2026 held that a taxpayer can only be required to explain his own share of investment and cannot be saddled with tax liability for the contribution of a co-owner, including a spouse, where joint ownership and independent sources of funds are evident. A Division Bench of Justice Dinesh Mehta and Justice Vinod Kumar set aside the assessment order passed under Sections 143(3) read with 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and remanded the matter for reconsideration,...

Arbitration Clause In Sevens Football Association Bylaws Does Not Bar Suit For Members Disputes: Kerala HC

The Kerala High Court has held that the arbitration clause in the bylaws of the Sevens Football Association does not bar a civil suit in disputes among its members or office bearers, as the clause is limited to disputes between the association's units. A coram of Justice S. Manu made the observation while dismissing an appeal challenging an interim injunction granted by the Additional District Court, Thrissur in a dispute over the use of the name “Sevens Football Association”, its...

Correct Appeal Forum Depends On Officer's Actual Rank, Not What An Order Mentions: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court on 15 April 2026 held that the appellate forum under the Customs Act, 1962 must be determined by the actual rank and statutory authority exercised by the adjudicating officer, and not by any incorrect or clerical mention in the order. A Division Bench comprising Justices A.S. Supehia and Pranav Trivedi dismissed the Department's Tax Appeal and upheld the CESTAT's order, holding that the appeal was correctly filed before the Tribunal under Section 129A of the Customs Act,...

Kerala High Court Dismisses Contempt Plea In Byju'S US Assets Sale Dispute, Imposes Costs

The Kerala High Court on April 6 dismissed a contempt petition arising out of the sale of US-based subsidiaries of BYJU'S, holding that contempt proceedings cannot be sustained once the underlying order has been set aside by the Supreme Court of India, and imposed costs of Rs. 50,000 on the petitioners.A Bench of Justice Easwaran S dismissed a contempt petition filed by Voizzit Technology Private Limited and its connected entity, and imposed costs of Rs. 50,000 on them, payable to the Kerala...