GST Registration Cannot Be Cancelled Through Cryptic, Non-Speaking Orders: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has recently set aside an order cancelling a taxpayer's GST registration, holding that an adjudicating authority cannot pass a cryptic and non-speaking order that carries adverse civil consequences. The court observed that even where a taxpayer fails to respond to a show cause notice, the statutory authority remains under an obligation to provide reasons and demonstrate application of mind while cancelling registration. "If an order is passed without giving a proper...

GST Proceedings Maintainable Against Heirs Even Without Action During Taxpayer's Lifetime: Madras HC

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on 16 June held that Section 93 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 permits GST authorities to initiate proceedings against the legal heirs of a deceased taxpayer even if no proceedings were initiated during the taxpayer's lifetime. Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy dismissed a writ petition filed by V. Damayanti, wife of the late V. Vasudevan, proprietor of Vasu Chemicals, challenging proceedings initiated after Vasudevan's death. He held:...

Madras High Court Upholds GST Proceedings Over Mismatch Between Seigniorage Fees and Reported Turnover

The Madras High Court has upheld GST proceedings against a quarry operator. It held that a mismatch between seigniorage fees paid for mineral extraction and the value of outward supplies reported in GST returns was sufficient to justify the tax department's prima facie view that turnover had been suppressed. Justice C. Saravanan dismissed writ petitions filed by KPR Enterprises for the 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21 tax periods. "Since the petitioner has paid a huge amount for the seigniorage...

Service Tax Cannot Be Levied By Treating Maintenance Of Minimum Balance As Consideration For Banking Services: Karnataka HC

The Karnataka High court has held that maintenance of a Minimum Average Balance (MAB) in a bank account is merely a contractual condition and cannot be treated as "consideration" for banking services so as to attract service tax. A bench of Justice S.R. Krishna Kumar quashed show-cause notices issued to Canara Bank, Bank of Baroda (formerly Vijaya Bank), Karnataka Bank and another bank over the proposed levy of service tax on facilities extended to customers maintaining minimum balances in...

Absence Of Signature On GST Assessment Order Renders It Legally Invalid: Andhra Pradesh High Court

On 15 June, the Andhra Pradesh High Court held that an unsigned GST assessment order suffers from an inherent legal defect and cannot be sustained in law, reaffirming that statutory orders must bear proper authentication to be enforceable. A Division Bench of Justices R. Raghunandan Rao and T.C.D. Sekhar set aside the impugned assessment order while allowing the writ petition filed by Nominee Works Committee Kalavalla and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication. The judges held: “This Court...

GSTAT Committee Recommends Waiver Of Submitting Certified Copies With Appeals If Orders Are On GST Portal

The Committee constituted by the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has recommended that appellants should not be required to file certified copies of orders that are already uploaded on the common GST portal. The proposal forms part of a wider set of suggested changes to the GSTAT (Procedure) Rules, 2025. The recommendation was among several suggestions considered by the committee after examining representations received from trade bodies, bar associations, and industry...

High Court Fare Approval Cannot Defeat GST Anti-Profiteering Mandate For Cinema Operators: GSTAT Delhi

The Delhi Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) on 27 May held that permission granted by State authorities or the Telangana High Court to collect proposed ticket fares cannot override the statutory obligation under Section 171 of the CGST Act to pass on the benefit of GST rate reduction to consumers through a commensurate reduction in prices. A Bench comprising Technical Member A. Venu Prasad dismissed the appeal filed by ASR Cinema LLP and affirmed the profiteering...

GST Registration Can Be Restored On Filing Pending Returns, Clearing Dues Under Rule 22(4): Gauhati HC

The Gauhati High Court on 1 June held that a taxpayer whose GST registration has been cancelled for non-filing of returns can seek restoration of registration by furnishing pending returns and clearing tax dues, interest, penalty and late fees in terms of the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017. A Bench of Justice Kardak Ete disposed of the petition filed by Md. Nekib Hussain, proprietor of Nekib Hussain, who challenged the cancellation of his GST registration and sought restoration...

Kerala High Court Quashes GST Notice Issued For Multiple Assessment Years Through Single Proceeding

On 1 June, the Kerala High Court held that the GST Department cannot issue a composite show-cause notice covering more than one assessment year, as such a notice is legally unsustainable and cannot form the basis of adjudication. Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. quashed the show-cause notice and the consequential Order-in-Original issued against Malabar Trade Links, while granting liberty to the GST Department to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law. He held: “The Division Bench has...

Kerala HC Holds ISD Optional Before 2024 Amendment; Quashes ₹1.31 Cr. GST Demand Against Intertek

On 8 June, the Kerala High Court held that, prior to the Finance Act, 2024 amendment to the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, companies were not required to distribute input tax credit (ITC) among distinct units through the Input Service Distributor (ISD) mechanism. Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. allowed a writ petition filed by Intertek India Pvt. Ltd. and quashed an order passed under Section 74 of the CGST Act that demanded over Rs.1.31 crore in GST and penalty on allegations of fraud,...

Gauhati High Court Holds DRC-01 Cannot Replace Statutory Show Cause Notice Under GST Act

The Gauhati High Court on 13 May held that GST authorities under the Assam GST Act cannot initiate and conclude proceedings under Section 73 solely on the basis of a Summary Show Cause Notice in Form GST DRC-01, reiterating that issuance of a proper statutory show cause notice is a mandatory precondition for raising a tax demand. Justice Manish Choudhury allowed the petition filed by Riyan Enterprises and set aside the adjudication order passed under Section 73 of the Assam GST Act for alleged...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Rules PLC Not Separately Taxable, Sets Aside DLF Advance Ruling Orders

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on 13 May held that Preferential Location Charges (PLC) collected by developers for offering a preferred location within a housing project form part of the composite construction service and cannot attract separate taxation. A Division Bench of Justices Deepak Sibal and Lapita Banerji allowed a writ petition filed by DLF Limited and quashed the Advance Ruling Authority order dated 28 August 2020 and the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling order dated 28...