Customs Act Does Not Prescribe Uniform Security For Provisional Release; Amount Must Be Reasonable: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has held that Section 110A of the Customs Act does not prescribe a uniform security for provisional release of seized goods and that the quantum must be determined reasonably based on the facts of each case.“Section 110A of the Customs Act does not prescribe a uniform security for any case and the quantum depends on the facts and circumstances of each case including the nature of the offence, goods/cargo, value of the seized conveyance, revenue exposure,...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Interfere With 2003 Customs Notice To Mangali Impex, Cites SC's Canon India Ruling

The Delhi High Court has declined to interfere with a 2003 show cause notice issued by the Customs Department to Mangali Impex Ltd., holding that the issue of whether the officer who issued the notice was the “proper officer” has already been settled by the Supreme Court in favour of the department.The Division Bench of Justices Avneesh Jhingan and Shail Jain was hearing a petition challenging the show cause notice issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Special Intelligence & Investigation...

Can Presumption That Seized Goods Are Smuggled Apply To 'Mastermind' Not In Physical Possession? Delhi HC To Examine

The Delhi High Court is set to examine whether the statutory presumption under Section 123 of the Customs Act can apply to a person alleged to be the “mastermind” or financier who is not in physical possession of the seized goods.The Division Bench of Justices Avneesh Jhingan and Shail Jain has framed the question while hearing appeals filed by the Principal Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) against CESTAT orders.Section 123 of the Customs Act provides for a statutory shift in the burden of...

Customs Can't Levy Interest For Period Before Liability Was Determined In Confiscation Proceedings: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that Customs authorities cannot calculate interest for a period during which the liability sought to be subjected to interest had itself not been determined.The Division Bench of Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Shail Jain made the observation while partly allowing a petition filed by Vishal Oil and Lubricants Co., challenging the interest reflected in the Customs EDI System in respect of a Bill of Entry filed in 2015.The Court directed the Customs authorities to...

Madras High Court Sets Aside Bank Guarantee Condition For Provisional Release Of ASC Impex Goods

The Madras High Court on 18 September set aside a bank guarantee condition imposed for provisional release of imported Polyester Woven Fabric with PVC Coating detained from ASC Impex over a classification dispute. Justice Hemant Chandangoudar directed Customs to release the goods on payment of applicable duty and execution of a personal bond for the differential duty. The Bench held: “The purpose of provisional release is to ensure that the goods are not unnecessarily detained during the...

Madras High Court Permits Mother, Minor Daughter To Seek Return Of Gold Jewellery Detained At Trichy Airport

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has allowed a mother and her minor daughter to approach the Customs authorities for the return of gold jewellery detained at Trichy Airport.The Court directed them to submit an application before the Customs authorities seeking return of the jewellery.Justice C. Saravanan passed the order while disposing of petitions filed by the mother and daughter challenging the detention of gold jewellery weighing 22.20 grams and 30.50 grams, valued at ₹2.89...

Madras High Court Quashes ₹20 Lakh Penalty On Customs Broker, Finds No Proof Of Collusion

The Madras High Court on 17 September set aside the Rs. 20 lakh penalty imposed on Newport Shipping and Logistics, holding that the material relied upon by the Customs authorities did not establish the broker's knowledge, conscious involvement or collusion in the attempted export of prohibited bull/ox meat. Justice Hemant Chandangoudar observed that a Customs Broker cannot be held liable for abetment of the attempted export of prohibited goods merely on the basis of routine activities such as...

Pendency Of Customs Adjudication Process Cannot Justify Provisional Attachment Beyond 12 Months: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has directed the defreezing of a bullion account belonging to a Chennai-based jewellery exporter.It held that a provisional attachment of a bank account under Section 110(5) of the Customs Act cannot continue beyond the maximum statutory period of 12 months.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar passed the order on a plea filed by Dhruv Jewellers, challenging a communication dated August 4, 2022, issued by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) to the bank directing it to...

Bona Fide Buyer Of Duty-Free Import Licence Not Liable For Exporter's Fraud: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court has recently held that a bona fide purchaser of a duty-free import licence cannot be made liable for the exporter's fraud when the purchaser had no knowledge of it.It observed that a licence obtained through fraud or misrepresentation is not automatically void or non-existent. Where the licence was genuinely issued by the competent authority and remained uncancelled, it continues to be valid until it is avoided in accordance with law."A bona fide purchaser of a duty-free...

HC Can't Bypass Customs Statutory Appeal Merely Due To Financial Hardship In Making Pre-Deposit: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that a taxpayer cannot bypass the statutory appellate mechanism under the Customs Act merely by citing financial hardship in complying with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement.The Division Bench of Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Shail Jain made the observation while dismissing a writ petition challenging ₹3 crore penalty imposed on a man in connection with an alleged attempt to export red sanders wood concealed beneath carpets."However, once the legislature has...

Time-Barred Customs Duty Can Be Adjusted From Voluntary Deposit If Importer Admitted Liability: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that although the limitation period under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962, bars the Revenue from initiating a fresh demand after the prescribed period, it does not prevent the authorities from appropriating an amount already voluntarily deposited by an importer during investigation towards the admitted customs duty liability.The Division Bench of Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Shail Jain was dealing with a case arising from a Directorate of Revenue Intelligence...

Calcutta High Court To Examine If Customs Can Treat 'Obscene Adult Sex Toys' As Prohibited Goods

The Calcutta High Court is set to examine whether goods described as “obscene adult sex toys” can be treated as “prohibited goods” under the Customs Act without identifying a specific statutory or notification-based prohibition. Justice Smita Das De is hearing a petition filed by Pracha Aalloy Private Limited against a July 22, 2026, Customs order. The key question is whether describing the goods as “obscene adult sex toys” and invoking Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 can, by...