CESTAT Mumbai Dismisses Gamco Appeal In Customs Dispute, Says Imported Marble Slabs Were Actually Limestone

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has dismissed the appeal filed by Gamco International in a customs classification dispute involving alleged misdeclaration of imported marble slabs. It upheld confiscation, redemption fines, penalties, and denial of exemption after finding that the goods were actually limestone. The tribunal held that, in this case, there was clear misdeclaration of both the nature and quantity of the imported goods. It said the customs...

CESTAT New Delhi Allows Toyota Boshoku's Appeal, Holds Seat Components As 'Parts Of Seats'

The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 21 April held that goods specifically classifiable as parts of seats cannot be reclassified under a general entry for motor vehicle parts, and accordingly allowed the appeal filed by Shiroki Automobiles India Pvt. Ltd. (now known as Toyota Boshoku Device India Pvt. Ltd.). A Bench comprising President Justice Dilip Gupta and Technical Member P.V. Subba Rao set aside the order of the Commissioner...

Delay Beyond 90 Days Not Condonable Under Customs Act: CESTAT Mumbai Reiterates

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 17 April, held that the Commissioner (Appeals) cannot condone delay in filing an appeal under Section 128(1) of the Customs Act beyond the original 60-day limitation period and the additional condonable 30-day period. A Bench comprising President Justice Dilip Gupta and Technical Member P. Anjani Kumar dismissed the appeals filed by Parekh Cranes and Machinery and its partner, and upheld the confiscation...

CESTAT Mumbai Allows Release Of Seized Drone Parts, Says Separate Consignments Not Complete Drones

The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at Mumbai has ordered the provisional release of seized drones and drone components, holding that Customs cannot deny release by treating separate consignments of parts as complete drones without establishing a one-to-one correlation and that the parts were capable of being reassembled into complete units. A coram of Judicial Member Dr. Suvendu Kumar Pati and Technical Member M.M. Parthiban held that the Department failed to show...

CESTAT New Delhi Sets Aside Duty Demand and Penalties On Ranbaxy In Ex-Works Valuation Dispute

On 24 April, the New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside the customs duty demand, invocation of the extended limitation period, and penalties imposed on Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. (now Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.) and customs broker Schenker India Pvt. Ltd. A Bench comprising President Justice Dilip Gupta and Technical Member P.V. Subba Rao held that although the importer incorrectly declared ex-works price as FOB value in Bills of...

CESTAT Kolkata Sets Aside IGST Demand On Tea Pruning Machine Importer, Faults Dept. For Classification Lapse

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside an IGST demand raised on an importer functioning under Tea Spares (India) over an alleged short payment of tax on imports of tea plucking and pruning machines.It held that the department could not apply a higher rate under a residual entry without first disputing the classification opted for by the taxpayer. The tribunal observed that “the adjudicating authority has appropriately questioned the...

CESTAT Mumbai Sets Aside ₹1.19 Crore Customs Duty Demand Against Sonova Over Hearing Aid Charging Cases

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has recently set aside a customs duty demand of about Rs 1.19 crore against Sonova Hearing India Pvt. Ltd. The order also wipes out the interest liability, an equal penalty, and a redemption fine of Rs 1 crore that had been imposed in the classification dispute over imported charging cases used with hearing aids. A bench of Judicial Member Dr. Suvendu Kumar Pati, and Technical Member M.M. Parthiban held that the product described...

GOQii Fitness Bands Not Pedometers But Data Communication Devices: CESTAT Mumbai Partly Allows Revenue Appeal

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai has ruled that GOQii activity trackers and fitness bands are not just simple pedometers, but devices with a range of features including the ability to communicate data. The tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal against GOQii Technologies Pvt. LtdThe order was passed by a bench of Judicial Member Dr. Suvendu Kumar Pati and Technical Member M.M. Parthiban while deciding a dispute over how these imported devices should...

CESTAT New Delhi Allows Refund Of Service Tax On Cancelled Project, Rejects Limitation Bar

The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 8 April held that authorities cannot deny refund of service tax paid on advances received for construction services on the ground of limitation, where the project is subsequently cancelled and the amounts are returned to customers. A Bench comprising Judicial Member Binu Tamta and Technical Member P.V. Subba Rao allowed the appeal filed by Reach Promoters Pvt. Ltd. and remanded the matter, holding that...

CESTAT Delhi Denies Nikon ₹7.32 Crore Refund, Holds Claim Pre-Exemption Decision Is Not Maintainable

The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi on 6 April, held that a refund claim filed before final adjudication of the underlying exemption dispute is not maintainable, even where duty has been paid under protest. A Bench comprising President Justice Dilip Gupta and Technical Member P.V. Subba Rao dismissed the appeal filed by Nikon India Private Limited and upheld rejection of its refund claim. The Tribunal held: “The facts of the...

Department Cannot Allege Excess Imports Without Explaining IGCR Clearance Irregularly: CESTAT New Delhi

On 10 April, the New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that where imported goods are cleared under the IGCR procedure, the Department cannot allege excess imports without explaining how customs officers permitted such clearance. A Bench of President Justice Dilip Gupta and Technical Member P.V. Subba Rao set aside a customs duty demand of Rs. 31.40 lakh against K.A. Enterprises. They observed: “In the absence of any recording as to which of...

CESTAT New Delhi Sets Aside Penalty On Time Avenue, Finds No Link To Importer's RSP Misdeclaration

The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 10 April set aside a penalty of Rs. 20,000 imposed on Time Avenue Pvt. Ltd. under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act. A Bench comprising President Justice Dilip Gupta and Technical Member Hemambika R. Priya held that the penalty under Section 112(b) could not be sustained in the absence of proof that the appellant knew the goods were liable to confiscation. The Tribunal observed: “There is no...