CESTAT Kolkata Sets Aside ₹50 Lakh Penalty Against Individual In Silk Necktie Export Drawback Case

According to the tribunal, obtaining a fake driving licence may amount to a criminal offence, but by itself did not attract penalties under the Customs Act

CESTAT Ahmedabad Says Director's Position Alone Cannot Attract Customs Penalty Quashes ₹1 Cr Levy

On 9 July, the Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that a company director cannot be penalised under the Customs Act, 1962 merely because of his position in the company unless the Department proves his active involvement in the alleged offence. Judicial Member Dr. Ajaya Krishna Vishvesha and Technical Member Satendra Vikram Singh allowed the appeal filed by Global Enterprises' director Altaf Ahmed and set aside the Rs. 1 crore penalty imposed...

CESTAT Mumbai Sets Aside Customs Broker Licence Revocation For Lack Of Independent Findings

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set aside the revocation of a Customs Broker's licence. It found that the customs department failed to establish that the broker had breached its obligations while handling exports that were later alleged to have been overvalued to claim higher duty drawback. A tribunal comprising Judicial Member S.K. Mohanty and Technical Member M.M. Parthiban held that the licensing authority had failed to independently...

CESTAT Chennai Sets Aside Customs Duty Demand After Royalty Was Added To Import Value

The Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set aside a customs duty demand that arose after royalty payments were added to the transaction value of imported raw materials. The tribunal followed its earlier ruling in the same company's case after finding that the Revenue had not shown any change in facts, produced any new document, or established any change in law to justify taking a different view. The bench of Judicial Member P. Dinesha and...

CESTAT Allahabad Sets Aside Gold Seizure, Finds Customs Relied On Unreliable Panchnama And Retracted Statements

The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside a customs order confiscating gold jewellery and bullion. It held that the panchnama forming the foundation of the case was unreliable because the Department failed to substantiate it by examining the panch witnesses. A bench of Judicial Member P.K. Choudhary and Technical Member P. Anjani Kumar held that the Revenue's case also rested on statements that had been retracted at the first available...

CESTAT Chennai Rejects Reclassification Of Nikrothal Wire To Stainless Steel Wire CTH

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 2 July held that the Customs Department cannot reclassify imported Nikrothal wire from Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 75052200 (Nickel Alloy Wire) to CTH 72230091 (Stainless Steel Wire) when the issue has already been decided in the importer's own case and there is no change in facts or law. Judicial Member P. Dinesha and Technical Member M. Ajit Kumar allowed an appeal filed by Alleima India Private Limited...

Duty-Free Gold Cannot Be Confiscated If DGFT Later Regularises Supporting Manufacturers: CESTAT Kolkata

The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that duty-free gold imported under the Advance Authorisation Scheme cannot be confiscated merely because it was sent to job workers who were not initially listed as supporting manufacturers. The tribunal held that the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) had later regularized their inclusion and that there was no evidence the gold had been diverted to unauthorised entities in violation of the...

E-Rickshaw Parts Without Motors, Batteries Not Complete Vehicles In CKD Form: CESTAT Kolkata

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 2 July held that imported e-rickshaw parts without essential components such as motors and batteries cannot be treated as complete e-rickshaws in a completely knocked down (CKD) condition. A Bench comprising Judicial Member Ashok Jindal and Technical Member K. Anpazhakan allowed cross-appeals filed by Zeniak Innovation India Ltd and the Revenue in a dispute over customs classification of imported...

CESTAT Kolkata Sets Aside Confiscation Of 1.75 Kg Gold, Holds Suspicion Insufficient To Prove Smuggling

On 2 July, the Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that Customs cannot treat gold as smuggled merely on suspicion and set aside the confiscation of 1.75 kg of gold along with penalties imposed by the department. Judicial Member Ashok Jindal and Technical Member K. Anpazhakan allowed the appeal filed by Dinesh Prasad and Raj Kumar Soni and quashed the confiscation order passed by Customs. The Bench observed: “...the Revenue has merely relied...

No Confiscation Of Exotic Birds Without Section 123 Notification Or Proof Of Smuggling: CESTAT Kolkata

On 3 July, the Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that Customs authorities cannot confiscate exotic birds and mammals or impose penalties merely on suspicion of smuggling, where the goods are not notified under Section 123 of the Customs Act and the Department fails to discharge the burden of proving illegal import. A Bench comprising Judicial Member Justice (Dr.) Ashok Jindal and Technical Member K. Anpazhakan allowed the appeals filed by...

CESTAT Kolkata Holds Control Of Premises Suffices For Liability In Gold Seizure Case, Cuts Penalty

On 2 July 2026, the Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that an individual who controlled premises from which authorities recovered a substantial quantity of gold cannot avoid penalty under the Customs Act merely on the ground that he lacked physical possession, as surrounding circumstances established his involvement in handling goods liable for confiscation. Judicial Member Ashok Jindal and Technical Member K. Anpazhakan partly allowed the...

CESTAT Chennai Sets Aside ₹3.92 Cr. Demand Based On Compilations, Holds Re-Export Must Be Verified

On 1 July, the Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside a customs duty demand of Rs. 3.92 crore raised against Econship Tech Pvt. Ltd. and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, holding that customs authorities cannot deny exemption under Notification No. 104/94-Cus. without independently verifying container-wise export compliance. Judicial Member Ajayan T.V. and Technical Member Vasa Seshagiri Rao observed that the dispute required...