Unauthenticated Foreign Authority Documents Can't Be Conclusive Proof In Customs Proceedings: CESTAT Chandigarh

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh has set aside a ₹4.95 crore customs duty demand against Findoc Impex, holding that unauthenticated documents allegedly obtained from the UAE Customs authorities could not, by themselves, establish that dry dates imported into India were of Pakistani origin. Emphasising that the burden rested on the Revenue to prove its allegations, the tribunal observed, "It is not for the appellant to disprove the allegations of the...

CESTAT Chandigarh Sets Aside ₹2.39 Crore Service Tax Demand Against SBI Card

The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh, has set aside a ₹2.39 crore service tax demand against SBI Card and Payment Services Ltd., holding that a show cause notice (SCN) that fails to identify the taxable service, the service recipient or the consideration cannot sustain such a demand. The tribunal observed, "We find that the SCN does not specify as to what was the service rendered by the appellants and to whom and what was the consideration thereon."A bench...

COVID Limitation Extension Can't Revive Time-Barred Service Tax Demands: CESTAT Kolkata

The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has ruled that the COVID-19-related extension of limitation cannot revive tax demands that had already become time-barred under the statute. A coram of Judicial Member R. Muralidhar and Technical Member K. Anpazhakan observed, "The subsequent exclusion of limitation during the pandemic cannot revive a cause of action or breathe life into a demand which had already become time-barred under the statute. The law relating to...

CESTAT Chandigarh Allows CENVAT Credit On Inputs From Exempt Units, Grants Relief To Reckitt Benckiser

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh, has ruled that consumer goods maker Reckitt Benckiser India Ltd. was entitled to claim CENVAT credit on duty-paid raw materials purchased from certain tax-exempt manufacturers.It held that the benefit could not be denied simply because the law was amended later to expressly allow it. "We find that before the amendment there was no express prohibition in the CENVAT Credit Rules so as to deny such credit availed by the...

Natural Gas Compression For Transport Is Not Manufacture; CESTAT Kolkata Quashes ₹8.97 Crore Excise Demand

The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside an excise duty demand of ₹8.97 crore against Great Eastern Energy Corporation Ltd. (GEECL), ruling that compressing natural gas solely to facilitate transportation does not amount to the manufacture of compressed natural gas (CNG).Relying on its earlier ruling in GEECL's own case and its decision in Essar Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Ltd., the tribunal observed, "The above two case laws make it...

Labour Contractor Liable For Service Tax Despite Production-Based Payments: CESTAT New Delhi

The New Delhi Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 31 July held that a labour contractor providing workers to a steel company was liable to pay service tax as the agreement was a manpower supply contract and not a job work arrangement for manufacturing. A Bench of Judicial Member Binu Tamta and Technical Member P.V. Subba Rao dismissed the appeal filed by Padam Charan Guman Singh and upheld the demand of service tax, interest and penalty under Section 78 of the Finance...

Coal Beneficiation Not Taxable As Business Auxiliary Service Before June 1, 2007: CESTAT Delhi

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has recently held that beneficiation and washing of coal could not be taxed under the category of Business Auxiliary Service for the period prior to June 1, 2007. Relying on an earlier case involving the taxpayer beore it, the tribunal ruled, "In that circumstance, reliance has been placed in appellant's own case for the earlier case(supra), we hold that the activity of beneficiation/ washing of coal does not fall under...

CESTAT Chandigarh Quashes ₹99.59 Lakh Demand, Says DGOV Guidelines Cannot Override Valuation Rules

The Chandigarh Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 28 July held that Directorate General of Valuation (DGOV) guidelines cannot override the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. Also that Customs authorities cannot reject a declared transaction value solely on the basis of such guidelines or London Metal Exchange (LME) prices without evidence proving that the declared value was incorrect.A Bench comprising Judicial Member S.S. Garg and Technical Member P. Anjani Kumar set...

CESTAT Kolkata Quashes ₹7.06 Crore Excise Demand, Says PSU Appellant Cannot Be Alleged To Have Acted Mala Fide

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata has set aside a ₹7.06 crore central excise demand against public sector undertaking Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., observing that the appellant, being a PSU, could not be alleged to have acted with mala fide intent to clear goods clandestinely.A coram of Judicial Member Ashok Jindal and Technical Member K. Anpazhakan observed, "Further, the appellant being a public sector undertaking, we are of the opinion that the appellant...

Gujarat High Court Faults CESTAT For 'Difficult To Decipher' Remand Order In Customs Classification Dispute

The Gujarat High Court has recently set aside a CESTAT order remanding a customs classification dispute, questioning how the tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to re-examine CBEC circulars despite an earlier Gujarat High Court judgment requiring the Union of India to undertake that exercise."We fail to understand how the Tribunal, in the facts of the present case, adopted the very same directions and remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority to re-look into the said Circulars,...

Gujarat High Court Dismisses LANXESS Belgium's Writ Against Anti-Dumping Duty, Holds CESTAT Proper Forum

The Gujarat High Court on 7 July held that disputes concerning the methodology used by the Designated Authority to determine dumping and injury margins in anti-dumping proceedings must be raised before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), and not through a writ petition unless exceptional circumstances exist. A Division Bench of Justices A.S. Supehia and Vaibhavi D. Nanavati dismissed the writ petition filed by Belgian exporter LANXESS Belgium N.V. challenging the...

Madras High Court Quashes ₹12.58 Cr Demand Against Pellagic Food, Upholds Advance Ruling Principles

The Madras High Court on 9 July quashed the Customs order passed against Pellagic Food Ingredients Pvt. Ltd. that raised a demand of Rs. 12.58 crore as differential customs duty, along with interest, confiscation of goods, redemption fine and penalties. A Single Judge Bench of Justice Hemant Chandangoudar held that Customs authorities should ordinarily follow the legal principles laid down in an Advance Ruling in similar cases, even though such rulings bind only the applicant who obtained them,...