ARBITRATION
Arbitration Cases Weekly Round Up: 11th January To 18th January, 2026
NOMINAL INDEX Bhagheeratha Engineering Ltd. v. State of Kerala, 2026 LLBiz SC 5Motilal Oswal Financial Services Limited v. Santosh Cordeiro & Anr., 2026 LLBiz SC 4Black Gold Resources Private Limitada v. International Coal Ventures Pvt. Ltd & Anr., 2026 LLBiz HC (DEL) 41Om Prakash v. Smt Laxmi Maurya, 2026 LLBiz HC (DEL) 54Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited v. Delkon India Pvt. Ltd., 2026 LLBiz HC (DEL) 36 National Highways Authority of India v. Roadway Solutions India Infra Limited,...
Rejection of Arbitration Claims On Limitation Is Interim Award; Challenge Lies Under Section 34: Calcutta HC
The Calcutta High Court has reiterated that where an arbitral tribunal conclusively rejects claims as barred by limitation, such a determination amounts to an interim award and is amenable to challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and not under Section 37. While Section 34 provides the remedy for challenging arbitral awards, Section 37 is confined to appeals against limited procedural or jurisdictional orders passed during the arbitral process. The ruling was...
Arbitration Clause In Partnership Reconstitution Deed Not Enforceable Against Non-Signatory: Karnataka High Court
The Karnataka High Court has held that an arbitration clause contained in a partnership reconstitution deed cannot be enforced b a person who has not signed the deed, and that in such circumstances, the court cannot appoint an arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Justice Lalitha Kanneganti made the observation in an order dated January 7 while hearing a petition filed by two outgoing partners of Shree Raghavendra Industries, seeking appointment of an arbitrator under an...
Financing Charges Under FIDIC Contract Must Be on Certified Claims: Delhi High Court Allows Jal Board Appeal
The Delhi High Court has held that financing charges under a FIDIC-based construction contract can be claimed only on amounts that are formally certified or have clearly become payable under the contract, and not on disputed or unverified claims. A Division Bench of Justice C. Hari Shankar and Justice Om Prakash Shukla partly allowed an appeal filed by the Delhi Jal Board against a Single Judge order that had upheld an arbitral award in favour of Mohini Electricals Ltd., setting aside the...
Director Not Party To Company's Articles of Association Cannot Invoke Arbitration Under the Articles: Delhi HC
The Delhi High Court has held that a director who has neither signed nor is a party to a company's Articles of Association cannot invoke an arbitration clause contained in those articles. A single judge bench of Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav said that arbitration requires clear and demonstrable consent. The court observed that "Thus, the mere existence of a document, despite it containing an arbitration clause, and persons, even if they are party to it, would not qualify as an...
Court Can Extend Arbitrator's Mandate Even After Its Expiry: Calcutta High Court
The Calcutta High Court has reiterated that an arbitrator's authority does not end automatically on expiry of the time limit prescribed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court said that it retains the power to extend an arbitrator's mandate even after expiry of the time fixed and that in this case the parties had consented by their conduct. Applying this settled position, the court extended the mandate of the arbitrator in the case before it and refused to terminate the...
Arbitrator Appointment Challenges Must Be Raised Before Tribunal, Not In Interim Appeals: Kerala High Court
The Kerala High Court has held that its role is limited when hearing an appeal against an interim order passed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. At this stage, the court cannot examine whether the arbitrator was properly appointed or has the authority to act. A Single Judge Bench of Justice S Manu said such objections must be raised before the arbitral tribunal itself. “Competency of the Arbitral Tribunal is a matter to be raised before the Tribunal by the party having a...
Executing Court Cannot Add Interest on Capital Expenditure If Arbitral Award Is Silent: MP High Court
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that courts enforcing arbitration awards cannot add interest on capital expenditure by default when the arbitral award is silent and there is no delay in payment. It also ruled that courts enforcing arbitration awards cannot redo the electricity pricing formula used to calculate payments to power distributors once an arbitral award has become final.A Division Bench of Justice Vivek Rusia and Justice Pradeep Mittal said an executing court has a limited role....
Bar On Court Granting Interim Relief Once Tribunal Is Constituted Applies Even In Foreign Arbitration: Bombay HC
The Bombay High Court has refused to grant interim relief to a Singapore-based company, holding that once a foreign-seated arbitral tribunal is constituted, Indian courts should be slow in entertaining unless the party shows that the tribunal cannot provide an effective remedy.Justice Bharati Dangre clarified that this principle applies even to foreign-seated arbitrations. While Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (for interim relief) can be invoked in such cases, the bar...
Complete Assignment for Consideration Prevails Over Conditional Agreement for Transfer of Future Shares: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court upheld an arbitral award involving a long-standing family dispute over shares in a demerged company. Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan held the arbitral tribunal's decision—that a later sale to a bona fide purchaser takes precedence over an earlier conditional arrangement—to be a plausible and well-reasoned conclusion. Background: The dispute arose from intra-family transactions within the Somani family concerning entitlement to 9.06% equity shares of Shreeniwas House...
Specific Performance After Contract Termination Permissible If Revived By Conduct, Even In Arbitration: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has held that the principle barring specific performance of a terminated contract is not an absolute rule and is subject to an exception where subsequent conduct of parties indicates revival of contractual obligations, particularly in arbitration proceedings.Justice Sandeep V. Marne made the observation while hearing a petition filed by Lotus Logistics and Developers Pvt. Ltd, challenging an arbitral award passed in favour of Evertop Apartments Co-operative Housing Society...